Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal

Hugo Consciência Silvestre , João Ricardo Catarino , Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de Araújo
{"title":"Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal","authors":"Hugo Consciência Silvestre ,&nbsp;João Ricardo Catarino ,&nbsp;Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de Araújo","doi":"10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-production includes all actions where citizens assist, as volunteers, in the provision of services by public agencies in order to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the public services provided. This practice, known as co-production, is being adopted by governments in the resolution of conflicts, particularly those regarding administrative and fiscal matters. However, <em>is co-production a more efficient and effective way of settling disputes in administrative and tax areas than the traditional administrative model? And why?</em> In Portugal, the Administrative Arbitration Centre was created in 2009 with the aim of resolving disputes between public administration and taxpayers/service users by means of co-production. The available data support the thesis that efficiency and efficacy are higher under the co-production model. Nevertheless, users are not totally satisfied since the costs associated with the use of this service provision model are also higher.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30471,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 355-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.007","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0080210716301790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Co-production includes all actions where citizens assist, as volunteers, in the provision of services by public agencies in order to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the public services provided. This practice, known as co-production, is being adopted by governments in the resolution of conflicts, particularly those regarding administrative and fiscal matters. However, is co-production a more efficient and effective way of settling disputes in administrative and tax areas than the traditional administrative model? And why? In Portugal, the Administrative Arbitration Centre was created in 2009 with the aim of resolving disputes between public administration and taxpayers/service users by means of co-production. The available data support the thesis that efficiency and efficacy are higher under the co-production model. Nevertheless, users are not totally satisfied since the costs associated with the use of this service provision model are also higher.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共服务提供中合作生产的证据:葡萄牙行政仲裁中心的案例
合作生产包括公民作为志愿者协助公共机构提供服务的所有行动,以提高所提供公共服务的效率和效力。各国政府在解决冲突,特别是有关行政和财政事项的冲突时,正在采用这种称为合作制作的做法。然而,联产是否比传统的行政模式更有效地解决行政和税收领域的纠纷?,为什么?在葡萄牙,行政仲裁中心于2009年成立,目的是通过联合生产的方式解决公共行政部门与纳税人/服务使用者之间的纠纷。现有数据支持合产模式下的效率和功效更高的理论。然而,用户并不完全满意,因为与使用此服务提供模型相关的成本也较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Formal and relational contracts between organizations: proposal of a model for analysis of the transactional and governance structure characteristics of comparative cases The use of dynamic capabilities to boost innovation in a Brazilian Chemical Company Investigating the deal making failure in M&A: deal makers’ perspective in Brazil What motivates money donation? A study on external motivators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1