The January 6th insurrection at the U.S. capitol: What the TRAP-18 can tell us about the participants.

Darin J. Challacombe, Carol L. Patrick
{"title":"The January 6th insurrection at the U.S. capitol: What the TRAP-18 can tell us about the participants.","authors":"Darin J. Challacombe, Carol L. Patrick","doi":"10.1037/tam0000194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On January 6, 2021, hundreds of individuals converged on and breached the U.S. Capitol building in an effort to overturn the presidential election results. For the current study, open-source research was conducted on 101 federally-indicted participants of this event – half who were indicted on assault or other violent felony crimes and the other half for trespassing or non-violent misdemeanor charges. Then, we used the Terrorism Radicalization Assessment Protocol (TRAP-18; Meloy & Gill, 2016) to examine these Capitol insurrection participants indicted for their actions. Four proximal warning behaviors and one distal behavior were significantly found to be related to the individuals indicted for violent crime. Similar to previous work using the TRAP-18, these results indicate that several dimensions of the tool postdicted violent behavior in this sample. Interestingly, this was the first study to test the TRAP-18 validity in a large group of extremists acting in concert.","PeriodicalId":217565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

On January 6, 2021, hundreds of individuals converged on and breached the U.S. Capitol building in an effort to overturn the presidential election results. For the current study, open-source research was conducted on 101 federally-indicted participants of this event – half who were indicted on assault or other violent felony crimes and the other half for trespassing or non-violent misdemeanor charges. Then, we used the Terrorism Radicalization Assessment Protocol (TRAP-18; Meloy & Gill, 2016) to examine these Capitol insurrection participants indicted for their actions. Four proximal warning behaviors and one distal behavior were significantly found to be related to the individuals indicted for violent crime. Similar to previous work using the TRAP-18, these results indicate that several dimensions of the tool postdicted violent behavior in this sample. Interestingly, this was the first study to test the TRAP-18 validity in a large group of extremists acting in concert.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1月6日在美国国会大厦的起义:什么陷阱-18可以告诉我们关于参与者。
2021年1月6日,数百人聚集在美国国会大厦,试图推翻总统选举结果。在目前的研究中,对101名被联邦起诉的参与者进行了开源研究,其中一半被指控犯有袭击或其他暴力重罪,另一半被指控非法侵入或非暴力轻罪。然后,我们使用了恐怖主义激进化评估协议(TRAP-18;Meloy & Gill, 2016)来检查这些国会起义参与者的行为。四种近端警告行为和一种远端警告行为与被控暴力犯罪的个体显著相关。与之前使用TRAP-18的工作类似,这些结果表明,该工具的几个维度预测了该样本中的暴力行为。有趣的是,这是第一个在一群一致行动的极端分子身上测试TRAP-18有效性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk and threat assessment instruments for violent extremism: A systematic review. Supplemental Material for Risk and Threat Assessment Instruments for Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review Supplemental Material for Differentiating Between Harmless and Harmful Threats: What Factors Increase Risk of Violence Following Threats? Target dispersion as a preapproach indicator in threat assessment and management. Supplemental Material for Risk Assessment Challenges in a Specialized Clinic for Individuals Referred for Violent Extremism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1