Correlates of Empathy Level in Incoming Medical Residents in a Large Peruvian Hospital

J. Huarcaya-Victoria, Jorge de la Cruz-Oré
{"title":"Correlates of Empathy Level in Incoming Medical Residents in a Large Peruvian Hospital","authors":"J. Huarcaya-Victoria, Jorge de la Cruz-Oré","doi":"10.5750/IJPCM.V7I2.604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Empathy is an important ability for interpersonal relationships, of special interest in the relationship between physician and patient. However, despite its importance, there has been very little work done on the study and evaluation of medical empathy in Peru. Objectives: The study was aimed at evaluating level of empathy in medical residents entering Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen (HNGAI), a large hospital in Lima, Peru and at evaluating its correlation with some important contextual and developmental variables.  Material and Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted on 107 incoming medical residents from a total of 142. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) was used and sociodemographic, professional and academic variables were collected. An exploratory data analysis was performed with SPSS 20. Results: The mean score of empathy level was 116.07. Although interesting rends were noted, no significant differences were found between level of empathy and specialty choice (“People-oriented”: 116.28 versus “technology-oriented”: 115.65; p = 0.837); gender (men: 114.74 versus women: 117.43; p = 0.341); and desire to study the selected specialty (desire: 116.37 versus no desire: 111.17; p = 0.333). Significant correlations were found between empathy level and “having a professional mentor for treating patients” (p = 0.024) and “affiliation to a religion” (p = 0.025). There was no significant correlation between level of empathy and age of the resident (r = 0.089; p = 0.373). Conclusions: Residents who identified themselves as affiliated to a religion as well as those who had a professional mentor for treating patients obtained higher scores of empathy level. While the study reflected positively on the establishment of a research program on empathy, further studies, including longitudinal ones are warranted.","PeriodicalId":402902,"journal":{"name":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V7I2.604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Empathy is an important ability for interpersonal relationships, of special interest in the relationship between physician and patient. However, despite its importance, there has been very little work done on the study and evaluation of medical empathy in Peru. Objectives: The study was aimed at evaluating level of empathy in medical residents entering Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen (HNGAI), a large hospital in Lima, Peru and at evaluating its correlation with some important contextual and developmental variables.  Material and Methods: This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted on 107 incoming medical residents from a total of 142. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) was used and sociodemographic, professional and academic variables were collected. An exploratory data analysis was performed with SPSS 20. Results: The mean score of empathy level was 116.07. Although interesting rends were noted, no significant differences were found between level of empathy and specialty choice (“People-oriented”: 116.28 versus “technology-oriented”: 115.65; p = 0.837); gender (men: 114.74 versus women: 117.43; p = 0.341); and desire to study the selected specialty (desire: 116.37 versus no desire: 111.17; p = 0.333). Significant correlations were found between empathy level and “having a professional mentor for treating patients” (p = 0.024) and “affiliation to a religion” (p = 0.025). There was no significant correlation between level of empathy and age of the resident (r = 0.089; p = 0.373). Conclusions: Residents who identified themselves as affiliated to a religion as well as those who had a professional mentor for treating patients obtained higher scores of empathy level. While the study reflected positively on the establishment of a research program on empathy, further studies, including longitudinal ones are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秘鲁一家大型医院住院医师移情水平的相关因素
背景:共情是人际关系中的一种重要能力,在医患关系中尤为重要。然而,尽管它很重要,秘鲁在医疗同理心的研究和评估方面所做的工作却很少。目的:本研究旨在评估秘鲁利马国立吉列尔莫·阿尔梅纳拉·伊里戈恩医院(HNGAI)住院医师的共情水平,并评估其与一些重要的环境和发展变量的相关性。材料和方法:这是一项观察性横断面研究,对总共142名住院医师中的107名进行了研究。采用杰弗逊医师共情量表(JSPE),收集社会人口学、专业和学术变量。采用SPSS 20进行探索性数据分析。结果:共情水平平均得分为116.07分。虽然发现了有趣的趋势,但共情水平与专业选择之间没有显著差异(“以人为本”:116.28比“以技术为导向”:115.65;P = 0.837);性别(男性:114.74对女性:117.43;P = 0.341);以及学习所选专业的意愿(意愿:116.37 vs .无意愿:111.17;P = 0.333)。共情水平与“是否有专业的治疗导师”(p = 0.024)和“是否有宗教信仰”(p = 0.025)存在显著相关。住院医师共情水平与年龄无显著相关(r = 0.089;P = 0.373)。结论:自认为有宗教信仰的住院医师和有专业治疗导师的住院医师共情水平得分较高。虽然该研究对共情研究项目的建立有积极的反映,但需要进一步的研究,包括纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PERSON-CENTERED CARE PLANNING AND SHARED DECISION MAKING FOR MENTAL AND COMORBID CONDITIONS REPORT OF THE FIRST PERUVIAN CONFERENCE ON PERSON-CENTERED MEDICINE SHARED DECISION MAKING FOR OTHER GENERAL CONDITIONS INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION FOR PERSON-CENTERED CARE SHARED DECISION MAKING IN ONCOLOGY AND PALLIATIVE CARE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1