Proximal Femoral Nail(PFN) for Femur Intertrochanteric Fracture

D. Shin, K. Kwun, Shin-Kun Kim, Sang Wook Lee, C. Choi, Kyung Min Kim
{"title":"Proximal Femoral Nail(PFN) for Femur Intertrochanteric Fracture","authors":"D. Shin, K. Kwun, Shin-Kun Kim, Sang Wook Lee, C. Choi, Kyung Min Kim","doi":"10.12671/JKSF.2002.15.3.328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : This prospective study was performed to evaluate the usefulness and the risk of the Proximal Femoral Nail(PFN) for internal fixation of the femur intertrochanteric fracture. Material and Method : We operated 26 consecutive intertrochanteric fracture patients with PFN from June 2000 to May 2001 and analysed the operation time, bleeding loss, union rate, union time, failure of fixation and complications. We also evaluated the clinical result with the recovery of ambulatory function and functional recovery score. R e s u l t : Mean operation time was 72 minutes and mean transfusion amount was 0.54 unit. 24 cases progressed to union until 4 months uneventfully and remaining 2 cases also progressed to union within 6months without further operation. There was no failure of fixation. Mean fracture site impaction was 4.4mm and among the 11 unstably reduced cases 3 showed overimpaction(> 10mm). Clinically mean loss of ambulation ability was 1.4 grade. Last follow Skovoron functional recovery score was 72.2. We removed laterally protruded hip pin and femur neck screws in two cases because of irritation on the lateral trochanteric area skin. But there was no significant complications such as intraoperative or postoperative fractures and femoral head cut out. Conclusion : The findings from this study indicate that, compared with other methods, PFN is useful and reliable choice for the femur intertrochanteric fracture treatment in the terms of less complications and equal or better results.","PeriodicalId":298665,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12671/JKSF.2002.15.3.328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Purpose : This prospective study was performed to evaluate the usefulness and the risk of the Proximal Femoral Nail(PFN) for internal fixation of the femur intertrochanteric fracture. Material and Method : We operated 26 consecutive intertrochanteric fracture patients with PFN from June 2000 to May 2001 and analysed the operation time, bleeding loss, union rate, union time, failure of fixation and complications. We also evaluated the clinical result with the recovery of ambulatory function and functional recovery score. R e s u l t : Mean operation time was 72 minutes and mean transfusion amount was 0.54 unit. 24 cases progressed to union until 4 months uneventfully and remaining 2 cases also progressed to union within 6months without further operation. There was no failure of fixation. Mean fracture site impaction was 4.4mm and among the 11 unstably reduced cases 3 showed overimpaction(> 10mm). Clinically mean loss of ambulation ability was 1.4 grade. Last follow Skovoron functional recovery score was 72.2. We removed laterally protruded hip pin and femur neck screws in two cases because of irritation on the lateral trochanteric area skin. But there was no significant complications such as intraoperative or postoperative fractures and femoral head cut out. Conclusion : The findings from this study indicate that, compared with other methods, PFN is useful and reliable choice for the femur intertrochanteric fracture treatment in the terms of less complications and equal or better results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨近端钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折
目的:本前瞻性研究旨在评估股骨近端钉(PFN)内固定股骨粗隆间骨折的有效性和风险。材料与方法:自2000年6月至2001年5月对26例使用PFN治疗的股骨粗隆间骨折患者进行手术时间、出血量、愈合率、愈合时间、固定失败及并发症分析。并以运动功能恢复情况和功能恢复评分对临床效果进行评价。结果:平均手术时间72分钟,平均输血量0.54单位。24例术后4个月顺利愈合,2例术后6个月顺利愈合。没有固定失败。骨折部位嵌塞平均4.4mm, 11例复位不稳定病例中3例出现过嵌塞(10 ~ 10mm)。临床平均行走能力丧失为1.4级。最后随访Skovoron功能恢复评分为72.2分。由于外侧粗隆区皮肤受到刺激,我们切除了两例外侧突出的髋钉和股骨颈螺钉。术中、术后无明显骨折、股骨头切开等并发症。结论:与其他方法相比,PFN是治疗股骨粗隆间骨折有效可靠的选择,并发症少,效果相同或更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Failures of Union of the Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Surgical Treatment of Internal Malleolar Fracture of the Ankle: Rush Rod Versus Plate Osteosynthesis Treatment of Infected Nonunion of Long Bone Shaft: Comparison between Fixation by Antibiotic-cement Loaded Intramedullary Nailing and Fixation by Antibiotic-cement Loaded External Monofixator Treatment of Completely Displaced Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus in Children. Arthroscopic-Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation of Patella Fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1