Are Tax Treaties for the Benefits of Taxpayers or Maximisation of State Revenue? A Review of VAT Treaty between Lesotho and South Africa

Malefetsane E. Nketekete
{"title":"Are Tax Treaties for the Benefits of Taxpayers or Maximisation of State Revenue? A Review of VAT Treaty between Lesotho and South Africa","authors":"Malefetsane E. Nketekete","doi":"10.4236/OJBM.2021.93078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The \nGovernments of the Kingdom of Lesotho and the Republic of South Africa have \nentered into double taxation treaty (DTA), as a cross border strategy to \nprevent fiscal evasion with respect to value-added tax. DTAs, worldwide do not \nonly address prevention of fiscal evasion of tax, but they benefit businesses \nand individuals against double taxation. It has however been observed that \ncertain services between the Republic of South Africa and Lesotho are taxed \ntwice when being imported into Lesotho. The study analysed the DTA to determine \nwhether this was in line with the agreement. Such an analyis was based on \nliterature review, document analysis in the form of Acts and the DTA itself. \nFrom the analysis, it was \nfound out that recharging tax for the identified services was contrary to the \nDTA and Value Added Tax governing the DTA. The general conclusion is that the \ntreatment of VAT on services is for tax revenue maximisation not in the \ninterest of the tax payers.","PeriodicalId":411102,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Business and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJBM.2021.93078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Governments of the Kingdom of Lesotho and the Republic of South Africa have entered into double taxation treaty (DTA), as a cross border strategy to prevent fiscal evasion with respect to value-added tax. DTAs, worldwide do not only address prevention of fiscal evasion of tax, but they benefit businesses and individuals against double taxation. It has however been observed that certain services between the Republic of South Africa and Lesotho are taxed twice when being imported into Lesotho. The study analysed the DTA to determine whether this was in line with the agreement. Such an analyis was based on literature review, document analysis in the form of Acts and the DTA itself. From the analysis, it was found out that recharging tax for the identified services was contrary to the DTA and Value Added Tax governing the DTA. The general conclusion is that the treatment of VAT on services is for tax revenue maximisation not in the interest of the tax payers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
税收协定是为了纳税人的利益还是为了国家收入的最大化?对莱索托与南非增值税条约的审查
莱索托王国和南非共和国两国政府签订了双重征税条约,作为防止在增值税方面逃税的跨边界战略。在世界范围内,dta不仅可以防止逃税,还可以使企业和个人免受双重征税。然而,有人指出,南非共和国和莱索托之间的某些服务在进口到莱索托时要付两次税。该研究分析了DTA,以确定这是否符合协议。这种分析是基于文献回顾,以act形式的文献分析和DTA本身。从分析中发现,对确定的服务征收附加税与DTA和管理DTA的增值税相违背。总的结论是,服务增值税的处理是为了税收收入最大化,而不是为了纳税人的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of the Recovery Path of the Consumer Sector in the Post-Pandemic Era An Analysis of the Recovery Path of the Consumer Sector in the Post-Pandemic Era The Effect of Employee Engagement on Employee Performance in Ghana’s MSMEs Sector during COVID-19: The Moderating Role of Job Resources Management Share Proprietory and Firm Value: Are There Peculiar Determinants? Historical Perspectives and the Emergence of the Sustainability Concept in Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1