Rationally Inattentive Consumer: An Experiment

Andrea Civelli, Cary A. Deck, J. LeBlanc, Antonella Tutino
{"title":"Rationally Inattentive Consumer: An Experiment","authors":"Andrea Civelli, Cary A. Deck, J. LeBlanc, Antonella Tutino","doi":"10.24149/wp1813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a laboratory experiment that directly tests the theoretical predictions of consumption choices under rational inattention. Subjects are asked to select consumption when income is random. They can optimally decide to reduce uncertainty about income by acquiring signals about it. The informativeness of the signals directly relates to the cognitive effort required to process the information. We find that subjects? behavior is largely in line with the predictions of the theory: 1) Subjects optimally make stochastic consumption choices; 2) They respond to incentives and changes in the economic environment by varying their attention and consumption; 3) They respond asymmetrically to positive and negative shocks to income, with negative shocks triggering stronger and faster reactions than positive shocks.","PeriodicalId":375605,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Economic Decision Theory (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Economic Decision Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24149/wp1813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a laboratory experiment that directly tests the theoretical predictions of consumption choices under rational inattention. Subjects are asked to select consumption when income is random. They can optimally decide to reduce uncertainty about income by acquiring signals about it. The informativeness of the signals directly relates to the cognitive effort required to process the information. We find that subjects? behavior is largely in line with the predictions of the theory: 1) Subjects optimally make stochastic consumption choices; 2) They respond to incentives and changes in the economic environment by varying their attention and consumption; 3) They respond asymmetrically to positive and negative shocks to income, with negative shocks triggering stronger and faster reactions than positive shocks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理性疏忽的消费者:一个实验
本文提出了一个实验室实验,直接检验了理性不注意下消费选择的理论预测。在收入随机的情况下,受试者被要求选择消费。他们可以通过获取有关收入的信号来最佳地决定减少收入的不确定性。信号的信息量直接关系到处理信息所需的认知努力。我们发现受试者?行为在很大程度上符合理论的预测:1)受试者做出最优的随机消费选择;2)他们对经济环境的激励和变化作出反应,改变他们的注意力和消费;3)他们对收入正冲击和负冲击的反应不对称,负冲击比正冲击触发的反应更强、更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shackle's Decision Order and Time: A Reader's Guide Myopia and Intertemporal Choice Nudging Timely Wage Reporting: Field Experimental Evidence from the United States Social Supplementary Income Program Cognitive Load in Economic Decisions Smoke on the Market: Inattentive Investors and the War in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1