Changing Verbal Label Assignments Selects the Memory System for Responses in an Immediate Visual Recognition Task

Alexa Becker, Mengxue Kang, A. Glass
{"title":"Changing Verbal Label Assignments Selects the Memory System for Responses in an Immediate Visual Recognition Task","authors":"Alexa Becker, Mengxue Kang, A. Glass","doi":"10.14713/arestyrurj.v1i3.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dual system hypothesis posits the existence of two neural systems for memory and learning in the mammalian brain: the habit system and the improvisational system. This study sought to determine whether both systems are involved in a visual recognition task originally outlined in Sternberg (1966) and whether each system could be selectively engaged on the basis of response assignment. Seventeen undergraduate students participated in an immediate visual recognition task where they responded whether or not a test consonant was present in a previous study sequence of one to six consonants by pressing one key for same or another key for different. When the different response was assigned to the spatially right “J” key, reaction time for targets and lures was a function of the study sequence size, indicating that the study sequence was serially scanned and compared with the test item by the habit system. However, when the same response was assigned to the spatially right “J” key, reaction time was not a function of study sequence size, indicating that the test item was not compared with the study sequence and responses were instead determined by perceived recency/novelty of the test item by the improvisational system. Differences in reaction time depending on response assignment suggest the selection of one memory system over the other based on verbal labels assigned to response keys in different spatial locations. Verbal label refers to the label of same or different assigned to the response keys in the experiment instructions. Results expand upon Sternberg (1966)—which used the same visual recognition task design as this study but did not account for response assignment, obscuring evidence of contributions from both memory systems—and provide more evidence for the dual-system hypothesis by demonstrating the involvement of both memory systems in immediate visual recognition.","PeriodicalId":196784,"journal":{"name":"Aresty Rutgers Undergraduate Research Journal","volume":"282 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aresty Rutgers Undergraduate Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14713/arestyrurj.v1i3.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dual system hypothesis posits the existence of two neural systems for memory and learning in the mammalian brain: the habit system and the improvisational system. This study sought to determine whether both systems are involved in a visual recognition task originally outlined in Sternberg (1966) and whether each system could be selectively engaged on the basis of response assignment. Seventeen undergraduate students participated in an immediate visual recognition task where they responded whether or not a test consonant was present in a previous study sequence of one to six consonants by pressing one key for same or another key for different. When the different response was assigned to the spatially right “J” key, reaction time for targets and lures was a function of the study sequence size, indicating that the study sequence was serially scanned and compared with the test item by the habit system. However, when the same response was assigned to the spatially right “J” key, reaction time was not a function of study sequence size, indicating that the test item was not compared with the study sequence and responses were instead determined by perceived recency/novelty of the test item by the improvisational system. Differences in reaction time depending on response assignment suggest the selection of one memory system over the other based on verbal labels assigned to response keys in different spatial locations. Verbal label refers to the label of same or different assigned to the response keys in the experiment instructions. Results expand upon Sternberg (1966)—which used the same visual recognition task design as this study but did not account for response assignment, obscuring evidence of contributions from both memory systems—and provide more evidence for the dual-system hypothesis by demonstrating the involvement of both memory systems in immediate visual recognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改变语言标签分配选择即时视觉识别任务中反应的记忆系统
双系统假说假定哺乳动物大脑中存在两个用于记忆和学习的神经系统:习惯系统和即兴系统。本研究试图确定两个系统是否都参与了最初在Sternberg(1966)中概述的视觉识别任务,以及每个系统是否可以在响应分配的基础上选择性地参与。17名大学生参加了一项即时视觉识别任务,在这项任务中,他们通过按一个键表示相同或另一个键表示不同,来回答测试辅音是否出现在先前的一到六个辅音序列中。当不同的反应被分配到空间右侧的“J”键时,目标和诱饵的反应时间是研究序列大小的函数,表明研究序列被习惯系统连续扫描并与测试项目进行比较。然而,当同样的反应被分配到空间右侧的“J”键时,反应时间并不是研究序列大小的函数,这表明测试项目没有与研究序列进行比较,反应是由即兴系统感知到的测试项目的近时性/新颖性决定的。反应时间的差异取决于反应分配,这表明一种记忆系统比另一种记忆系统的选择基于分配给不同空间位置的反应键的口头标签。文字标签是指在实验说明书中分配给反应键的相同或不同的标签。Sternberg(1966)使用了与本研究相同的视觉识别任务设计,但没有考虑到反应分配,模糊了两个记忆系统贡献的证据,并通过证明两个记忆系统都参与即时视觉识别,为双系统假说提供了更多证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assimilation: How Post-9/11 Government Tactics Have Hindered Muslims From Socioeconomic Integration A Systematic Literature Review on the Intersection of Experiential and Multimedia Learning With Virtual Reality and Its Implications The Electoral College’s Impact on Presidential Mandates and Agendas Physical Activity and Pain During Pregnancy Relationship Between Biophysical Properties of Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs) and their Associated Drug Efficacies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1