The Protected Polluters: Empirical Evidence from the National Environmental Information Disclosure Program in China

Zhang Tuo, Li Xie
{"title":"The Protected Polluters: Empirical Evidence from the National Environmental Information Disclosure Program in China","authors":"Zhang Tuo, Li Xie","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3404132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a bottom-up approach, the effectiveness of the environmental information transparency policy hinges on a broad societal ecosystem, including elements such as the active mass media and the robust civil society. However, due to the lack of public participation and accountability mechanisms, it is still doubtful whether the Chinese environmental transparency program promoted corporate pollution mitigation efforts. In this study, we investigated the impacts of the Environmental Information Disclosure (EID) program, an important Chinese environmental transparency program, on corporate mitigation investments, by using the 2012 Chinese Private Enterprise Survey. Our Tobit-IV model provides robust evidence that transparency policy exerts significant influences only on non-politically connected polluters, while, by contrast, politically connected firms are less susceptible to the EID program. We suggest that the community should be empowered to deter the shelter effects of local governors to the connected firms, which deteriorate the effectiveness of the transparency program.","PeriodicalId":388011,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3404132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Abstract As a bottom-up approach, the effectiveness of the environmental information transparency policy hinges on a broad societal ecosystem, including elements such as the active mass media and the robust civil society. However, due to the lack of public participation and accountability mechanisms, it is still doubtful whether the Chinese environmental transparency program promoted corporate pollution mitigation efforts. In this study, we investigated the impacts of the Environmental Information Disclosure (EID) program, an important Chinese environmental transparency program, on corporate mitigation investments, by using the 2012 Chinese Private Enterprise Survey. Our Tobit-IV model provides robust evidence that transparency policy exerts significant influences only on non-politically connected polluters, while, by contrast, politically connected firms are less susceptible to the EID program. We suggest that the community should be empowered to deter the shelter effects of local governors to the connected firms, which deteriorate the effectiveness of the transparency program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受保护的污染者:来自中国国家环境信息公开计划的经验证据
环境信息透明政策是一种自下而上的途径,其有效性取决于一个广泛的社会生态系统,包括活跃的大众媒体和强大的公民社会等因素。然而,由于缺乏公众参与和问责机制,中国的环境透明项目是否促进了企业减轻污染的努力仍然值得怀疑。在本研究中,我们通过2012年中国民营企业调查,调查了环境信息披露(EID)计划对企业减排投资的影响,这是中国重要的环境透明度计划。我们的Tobit-IV模型提供了强有力的证据,表明透明度政策仅对没有政治关系的污染者产生重大影响,而相比之下,有政治关系的公司不太容易受到EID计划的影响。我们建议,社区应被授权阻止地方官员对关联公司的庇护效应,这种庇护效应会降低透明度项目的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Joining Forces: The Spillover Effects of EPA Enforcement Actions and the Role of Socially Responsible Investors Media, Reputational Risk, and Bank Loan Contracting The Governance of Enterprise and Supplier Development Corruption and CSR: New Evidence from China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign The “Value” of a Public Benefit Corporation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1