Career Choice Disclosure and Clerkship Grades Among Orthopaedic Residency Applicants

M. Mulcahey, Jeffrey M. Henstenburg, A. Hinkle, M. Stamm, M. Morley, Joshua Luginbuhl
{"title":"Career Choice Disclosure and Clerkship Grades Among Orthopaedic Residency Applicants","authors":"M. Mulcahey, Jeffrey M. Henstenburg, A. Hinkle, M. Stamm, M. Morley, Joshua Luginbuhl","doi":"10.60118/001c.55753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical student clerkship evaluations are susceptible to preceptor bias. Students interested in orthopaedics may choose not to disclose their career path during clerkships to avoid bias. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that may lead to grading bias, including career choice disclosure, among medical students interested in a career in orthopaedic surgery. A cross-sectional survey was performed by distributing an anonymous electronic survey. Respondents were asked if they disclosed an interest in orthopaedic surgery during core clerkships and whether or not they believed it impacted their grade. The relationship between demographic variables including age, gender, race, ethnicity, and geographical location were also collected and compared. Multiple institutions in different geographic locations in the US. Medical students in orthopaedic interest groups or those who completed an orthopaedic surgery rotation. Of 149 responses, 90 (60.1%) of students chose to disclose an interest in orthopaedics during all clerkships. Over 50% of students were able to achieve honors in core clerkships except for OB/Gyn (41/112, 36.6% honors) and emergency medicine (17/59, 28.8% honors). On average, 7.9% of students believed disclosure had a negative impact on their grade, but in internal medicine and OB/Gyn, those that disclosed were able to achieve honors more often than those that did not. Males (38/50, 76%) were given honors more often than females (11/24, 45.8%) in their surgery clerkship and those that identified as “other” race (1/6, 16.7%) achieved fewer honors in surgery and pediatrics compared to White, Black, Asian, Indian, and Hispanic students (48/68, 70.6%). Some students believe disclosing an interest in orthopaedics may negatively impact their grade, but the opposite may be true. Other potential areas of bias include gender and race. More research is needed to improve the clerkship evaluation process given an increasingly competitive application process.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.55753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical student clerkship evaluations are susceptible to preceptor bias. Students interested in orthopaedics may choose not to disclose their career path during clerkships to avoid bias. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that may lead to grading bias, including career choice disclosure, among medical students interested in a career in orthopaedic surgery. A cross-sectional survey was performed by distributing an anonymous electronic survey. Respondents were asked if they disclosed an interest in orthopaedic surgery during core clerkships and whether or not they believed it impacted their grade. The relationship between demographic variables including age, gender, race, ethnicity, and geographical location were also collected and compared. Multiple institutions in different geographic locations in the US. Medical students in orthopaedic interest groups or those who completed an orthopaedic surgery rotation. Of 149 responses, 90 (60.1%) of students chose to disclose an interest in orthopaedics during all clerkships. Over 50% of students were able to achieve honors in core clerkships except for OB/Gyn (41/112, 36.6% honors) and emergency medicine (17/59, 28.8% honors). On average, 7.9% of students believed disclosure had a negative impact on their grade, but in internal medicine and OB/Gyn, those that disclosed were able to achieve honors more often than those that did not. Males (38/50, 76%) were given honors more often than females (11/24, 45.8%) in their surgery clerkship and those that identified as “other” race (1/6, 16.7%) achieved fewer honors in surgery and pediatrics compared to White, Black, Asian, Indian, and Hispanic students (48/68, 70.6%). Some students believe disclosing an interest in orthopaedics may negatively impact their grade, but the opposite may be true. Other potential areas of bias include gender and race. More research is needed to improve the clerkship evaluation process given an increasingly competitive application process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨科住院医师申请人职业选择披露与实习成绩
医学生见习评估容易受到导师偏见的影响。对骨科感兴趣的学生在实习期间可以选择不透露自己的职业道路,以避免偏见。本研究的目的是找出可能导致评分偏倚的因素,包括职业选择披露,在有兴趣从事骨科手术的医学生中。横断面调查是通过分发匿名电子调查来完成的。受访者被问及他们是否在核心职员期间透露过对骨科手术的兴趣,以及他们是否认为这影响了他们的成绩。还收集和比较了年龄、性别、种族、民族和地理位置等人口统计变量之间的关系。在美国不同地理位置的多个机构。骨科兴趣小组的医学生或完成骨科手术轮转的医学生。在149份回应中,90名(60.1%)学生选择在所有实习期间透露对骨科的兴趣。除妇产科(41/112,36.6%)和急诊医学(17/59,28.8%)外,其他核心见习专业均有超过50%的学生获得荣誉。平均而言,7.9%的学生认为披露对他们的成绩有负面影响,但在内科和妇产科,那些披露的学生比那些没有披露的学生更容易获得荣誉。在外科实习中,男性(38/50,76%)比女性(11/24,45.8%)获得荣誉的次数更多,而那些被认定为“其他”种族的学生(1/6,16.7%)在外科和儿科方面获得的荣誉比白人、黑人、亚裔、印第安人和西班牙裔学生(48/68,70.6%)要少。一些学生认为透露对骨科的兴趣可能会对他们的成绩产生负面影响,但事实可能恰恰相反。其他潜在的偏见包括性别和种族。鉴于申请程序的竞争日益激烈,需要进行更多的研究来改进职员评价程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“In My Experience…15 Data Points To Better Evaluate Platelet Rich Plasma Kits And Protocols” “In My Experience…Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery” A New Paradigm in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis and Arthroplasty with Dynamic Patient-source Outcome Measures: Comprehensive Clinical Review of the Knee Kinesiography Exam with the KneeKG® System Latarjet Classics: An Analysis of The 50 Most-Cited Articles on The Latarjet Procedure “In My Experience…Medical Device Design & Innovation in Shoulder Replacements”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1