New concepts for qualitative trader cooperation

A. Puder, C. Burger
{"title":"New concepts for qualitative trader cooperation","authors":"A. Puder, C. Burger","doi":"10.1109/ICDP.1996.864210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traders serve as mediators between service providers and users. The trader returns to a service requester by delivering a set of suitable providers that satisfy the request. Because of the size and complexity of distributed systems, one trader manages a certain part of the whole set of providers only. To enlarge this restricted set of potential service providers, a lightweight form of cooperation (called interworking) between two or more traders was introduced. Therefore, the main purpose of such cooperations was concerned with quantitative aspects, neglecting the possibilities of more general concepts of cooperation. A need for qualitative trader cooperations arises. Traditional trader approaches focus upon the operational interface of providers as a basis for type descriptions. But in general, application users in an open electronic market require mediation at different levels of abstraction. Suitable traders are specialized in one of these levels. By combining these isolated solutions, a qualitative trader cooperation can be achieved. In the following, we take a closer look at type descriptions at different levels of abstraction. Similarities will be discovered that can be used to derive appropriate mappings. In particular we demonstrate that ODP-types based on an arbitrary interface definition language can be described in terms of conceptual graphs that are used in knowledge-based trading. From this relationship, a general type manager can be derived, coping with both type concepts. As a consequence, the trading of operational interfaces and the trading based on a knowledge representation scheme can be combined. Together they exhibit a more powerful trading service by offering different interfaces to different kinds of users.","PeriodicalId":127207,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Platforms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Platforms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDP.1996.864210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Traders serve as mediators between service providers and users. The trader returns to a service requester by delivering a set of suitable providers that satisfy the request. Because of the size and complexity of distributed systems, one trader manages a certain part of the whole set of providers only. To enlarge this restricted set of potential service providers, a lightweight form of cooperation (called interworking) between two or more traders was introduced. Therefore, the main purpose of such cooperations was concerned with quantitative aspects, neglecting the possibilities of more general concepts of cooperation. A need for qualitative trader cooperations arises. Traditional trader approaches focus upon the operational interface of providers as a basis for type descriptions. But in general, application users in an open electronic market require mediation at different levels of abstraction. Suitable traders are specialized in one of these levels. By combining these isolated solutions, a qualitative trader cooperation can be achieved. In the following, we take a closer look at type descriptions at different levels of abstraction. Similarities will be discovered that can be used to derive appropriate mappings. In particular we demonstrate that ODP-types based on an arbitrary interface definition language can be described in terms of conceptual graphs that are used in knowledge-based trading. From this relationship, a general type manager can be derived, coping with both type concepts. As a consequence, the trading of operational interfaces and the trading based on a knowledge representation scheme can be combined. Together they exhibit a more powerful trading service by offering different interfaces to different kinds of users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质的贸易合作新概念
交易者充当服务提供者和用户之间的调解人。交易者通过交付一组满足请求的合适提供者返回给服务请求者。由于分布式系统的规模和复杂性,一个交易者只管理整个提供者集合的某一部分。为了扩大这一有限的潜在服务提供者集合,引入了两个或多个交易商之间的轻量级合作形式(称为互操作)。因此,这种合作的主要目的在于数量方面,而忽略了更一般的合作概念的可能性。需要进行有质量的贸易商合作。传统的贸易商方法将重点放在提供者的操作接口上,作为类型描述的基础。但是一般来说,开放电子市场中的应用程序用户需要不同抽象级别的中介。合适的交易者是专门在这些水平之一。通过结合这些孤立的解决方案,可以实现定性的贸易合作。在下文中,我们将进一步了解不同抽象级别上的类型描述。将发现可用于派生适当映射的相似性。特别地,我们证明了基于任意接口定义语言的odp类型可以用用于知识交易的概念图来描述。从这种关系中,可以派生出一个通用类型管理器,处理这两个类型概念。因此,可以将操作接口的交易与基于知识表示方案的交易相结合。通过为不同类型的用户提供不同的界面,它们共同展示了更强大的交易服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SMT: a system monitoring tool for DCE Distributed computing environment (DCE) porting tool Standards for distributed platforms Performance evaluation of a distributed application performance monitor The impact of mobility on distributed systems platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1