Integrative Employment and Social Security Rights

Lilach Lurie
{"title":"Integrative Employment and Social Security Rights","authors":"Lilach Lurie","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2189352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workers today face many labour market transitions (e.g., between work and caring for family members). This article is intended to make two main contributions to the ongoing debate on how the law should regulate labour market transitions. First, it aims to promote a better understanding of existing and theoretically possible employment and social security provisions by placing them on a spectrum of regulatory models, from individual to integrative regulation. Second, it examines the concept of Integrative Employment and Social Security Rights (IERs), as one of the models on the spectrum. IERs are legal rights that apply to workers in several or all labour market transitions (e.g., the right to request working reduced hours). The application of IERs has several justifications (e.g., promoting individual autonomy and fighting discrimination) tempered with considerations that would at times limit their usage (e.g., inefficiencies). By presenting the justifications for IERs as well as the limitations on their normative application, the article provides a possible roadmap for rethinking employment and social security law.","PeriodicalId":431496,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Employment Statutes (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Employment Statutes (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2189352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workers today face many labour market transitions (e.g., between work and caring for family members). This article is intended to make two main contributions to the ongoing debate on how the law should regulate labour market transitions. First, it aims to promote a better understanding of existing and theoretically possible employment and social security provisions by placing them on a spectrum of regulatory models, from individual to integrative regulation. Second, it examines the concept of Integrative Employment and Social Security Rights (IERs), as one of the models on the spectrum. IERs are legal rights that apply to workers in several or all labour market transitions (e.g., the right to request working reduced hours). The application of IERs has several justifications (e.g., promoting individual autonomy and fighting discrimination) tempered with considerations that would at times limit their usage (e.g., inefficiencies). By presenting the justifications for IERs as well as the limitations on their normative application, the article provides a possible roadmap for rethinking employment and social security law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合就业和社会保障权利
今天的工人面临着许多劳动力市场的转变(例如,在工作和照顾家庭成员之间)。本文旨在为正在进行的关于法律应如何规范劳动力市场转型的辩论做出两个主要贡献。首先,它旨在通过将现有的和理论上可能的就业和社会保障条款置于从个人监管到综合监管的一系列监管模式中,从而促进对这些条款的更好理解。其次,它考察了综合就业和社会保障权利(IERs)的概念,作为光谱上的模型之一。工业补偿是适用于几个或所有劳动力市场转型中的工人的法律权利(例如,要求减少工作时间的权利)。IERs的应用有几个理由(例如,促进个人自治和反对歧视),但有时会限制其使用(例如,效率低下)。本文通过阐述就业与社会保障法的正当性及其规范应用的局限性,为重新思考就业与社会保障法提供了可能的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reforming Labour Laws in the Netherlands: An Assessment of the Redistributive Effects Twenty-First Century Employers The Fourth Circuit Year in Review: Labor and Employment Law Cases October 1, 2015 Through September 30, 2016 Automatically Unfair and Operational Requirement Dismissals: Making Sense of the 2014 Amendments Untrustworthy: ERISA's Eroded Fiduciary Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1