Exploring the characteristics, acuity and management of adult ED patients at night-time

R. Simpson, S. Croft, C. O'Keeffe, R. Jacques, T. Stone, Nisar Ahmed, S. Mason
{"title":"Exploring the characteristics, acuity and management of adult ED patients at night-time","authors":"R. Simpson, S. Croft, C. O'Keeffe, R. Jacques, T. Stone, Nisar Ahmed, S. Mason","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2018-208248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives ED care is required for acutely unwell and injured patients 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics and activity of type 1 ED attendances according to whether their time of arrival was during the day (08:00–18:00) or at night (18:00–08:00). Methods Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from NHS Digital for all A&E and admitted patient care activity provided by all acute (not mental health or primary care) NHS hospital trusts in Yorkshire and Humber (1 April 2011 to 31 March 2014) for adult patients were analysed. Adjusted linear and logistic regression was used to model the data. Results Adjusted regression analysis results show that patients who attended ED at night waited an extra 18.76 (95% CI 18.62 to 18.89) min to be seen by a clinician. They also spent an additional 13.64 (95% CI 13.47 to 13.81) min total in ED. Patients who attended at night were OR 2.20 (95% CI 2.17 to 2.23) times more likely to leave without being seen. They were also OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.27) times more likely to re-attend the ED and were OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.21) times more likely to present with non-urgent conditions. Overnight patients were more likely to be admitted to hospital, OR 1.09 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.10) times, however, those admitted were more likely to have a short-stay admission. Conclusion There is an ‘overnight effect’ of patients attending EDs. Patients wait longer, leave without being seen, attend with non-urgent problems and are more likely to be admitted for a short stay. Further work is required to identify the potential underlying causes of these differences.","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2018-208248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives ED care is required for acutely unwell and injured patients 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics and activity of type 1 ED attendances according to whether their time of arrival was during the day (08:00–18:00) or at night (18:00–08:00). Methods Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from NHS Digital for all A&E and admitted patient care activity provided by all acute (not mental health or primary care) NHS hospital trusts in Yorkshire and Humber (1 April 2011 to 31 March 2014) for adult patients were analysed. Adjusted linear and logistic regression was used to model the data. Results Adjusted regression analysis results show that patients who attended ED at night waited an extra 18.76 (95% CI 18.62 to 18.89) min to be seen by a clinician. They also spent an additional 13.64 (95% CI 13.47 to 13.81) min total in ED. Patients who attended at night were OR 2.20 (95% CI 2.17 to 2.23) times more likely to leave without being seen. They were also OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.27) times more likely to re-attend the ED and were OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.21) times more likely to present with non-urgent conditions. Overnight patients were more likely to be admitted to hospital, OR 1.09 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.10) times, however, those admitted were more likely to have a short-stay admission. Conclusion There is an ‘overnight effect’ of patients attending EDs. Patients wait longer, leave without being seen, attend with non-urgent problems and are more likely to be admitted for a short stay. Further work is required to identify the potential underlying causes of these differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨成人夜间急诊科患者的特点、敏锐度及处理
目的急诊科护理需要急性不适和受伤的病人,每天24小时,每周7天。本研究的目的是根据患者到达时间是白天(08:00-18:00)还是晚上(18:00-08:00)来比较1型ED患者的特征和活动。方法分析2011年4月1日至2014年3月31日期间,来自NHS Digital的所有急症室(A&E)的医院事件统计(HES)数据,以及约克郡和亨伯所有急性(非精神卫生或初级保健)NHS医院信托提供的成年患者住院护理活动。采用调整后的线性和逻辑回归对数据进行建模。结果调整后的回归分析结果显示,在夜间就诊的患者等待临床医生的时间增加了18.76分钟(95% CI 18.62至18.89)。他们在急诊科的总时间也增加了13.64分钟(95% CI 13.47 - 13.81)。夜间就诊的患者离开急诊科的OR为2.20倍(95% CI 2.17 - 2.23)。他们再次去急诊室的可能性是1.26倍(95% CI 1.25 - 1.27),出现非紧急情况的可能性是1.20倍(95% CI 1.19 - 1.21)。过夜患者更有可能入院,OR为1.09倍(95% CI 1.09至1.10),然而,入院的患者更有可能短期住院。结论急诊科患者就诊存在“隔夜效应”。病人等待的时间更长,离开时无人问诊,有非紧急问题,而且更有可能被允许短期停留。需要进一步的工作来确定这些差异的潜在潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive performance of the common red flags in emergency department headache patients: a HEAD and HEAD-Colombia study. Prognostic awareness of seriously ill older adults in the emergency department. Is arrival by ambulance a risk factor for myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with cardiac sounding chest pain? Acutely shaky hand. Recurrent calf pain after sport activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1