Performance comparison of three call admission control algorithms in a wireless ad-hoc network

G. Razzano, A. Curcio
{"title":"Performance comparison of three call admission control algorithms in a wireless ad-hoc network","authors":"G. Razzano, A. Curcio","doi":"10.1109/ICCT.2003.1209775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three connection admission control (CAC) algorithms are described and compared via computer simulations by referring to the novel WIND-FLEX wireless LAN, recently developed in the framework of a European IST project. The three CAC solutions employ different strategies to estimate the link utilization, thus giving different performance in terms of number of refused connections and network throughput. The first solution is characterized by reduced complexity by unsatisfactory performance. The other two methods, exhibit much better performance at a reasonable complexity increase. So, they are good candidates for practical applications.","PeriodicalId":237858,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Communication Technology Proceedings, 2003. ICCT 2003.","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Communication Technology Proceedings, 2003. ICCT 2003.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCT.2003.1209775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Three connection admission control (CAC) algorithms are described and compared via computer simulations by referring to the novel WIND-FLEX wireless LAN, recently developed in the framework of a European IST project. The three CAC solutions employ different strategies to estimate the link utilization, thus giving different performance in terms of number of refused connections and network throughput. The first solution is characterized by reduced complexity by unsatisfactory performance. The other two methods, exhibit much better performance at a reasonable complexity increase. So, they are good candidates for practical applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无线自组网中三种呼叫接纳控制算法的性能比较
本文描述了三种连接允许控制(CAC)算法,并通过计算机模拟对其进行了比较,该算法参考了最近在欧洲IST项目框架内开发的新型WIND-FLEX无线局域网。这三种CAC解决方案采用不同的策略来估计链路利用率,从而在拒绝连接的数量和网络吞吐量方面提供不同的性能。第一种解决方案的特点是由于性能不理想而降低了复杂性。另外两种方法在合理的复杂度增加下表现出更好的性能。因此,它们是实际应用的良好候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A multicast congestion control scheme for heterogeneous receivers A novel automated fault identification approach in computer networks based on graph theory Blind channel estimation algorithm of uplink for MC-CDMA system A new approach for carrier frequency offset estimation in OFDM communication system Proactive earliest due-date scheduling in wireless packet networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1