Online In-Route Task Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing

Camila F. Costa, M. Nascimento
{"title":"Online In-Route Task Selection in Spatial Crowdsourcing","authors":"Camila F. Costa, M. Nascimento","doi":"10.1145/3397536.3422215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider the following scenario: (a) a worker traveling on the shortest path between two locations in a city's road network, (b) he/she is willing to deviate from such path in order to complete tasks in the network, (c) tasks are associated with rewards and appear and disappear dynamically, i.e., they are not known in advance, and (d) the worker specifies a time budget which limits the total time he/she is willing to spend on his/her trip. Now assume the worker wants to minimize the detour from the original path while, at the same time, maximizing the rewards collected by completing tasks; clearly two competing criteria. We call this problem the Online In-Route Task Selection (Online-IRTS) query, and we investigate it using the paradigm of skyline queries in order to systematically explore different trade-offs between earned rewards and path deviation. Because of the online nature of the problem, i.e., irrevocable decisions about which task to perform have to be made without knowledge of future tasks, it is not possible to guarantee optimal solutions for the Online-IRTS query. Therefore, we propose two heuristic approaches, one is based on local optimizations, and the other one is based on incremental solutions, along with a method to evaluate the quality of their solutions w.r.t. the optimal offline solution. Our experiments using city-scale realistic datasets show that the first approach is more effective whereas the second is more efficient, allowing one to choose which approach to use according to his/her priorities.","PeriodicalId":233918,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3397536.3422215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Consider the following scenario: (a) a worker traveling on the shortest path between two locations in a city's road network, (b) he/she is willing to deviate from such path in order to complete tasks in the network, (c) tasks are associated with rewards and appear and disappear dynamically, i.e., they are not known in advance, and (d) the worker specifies a time budget which limits the total time he/she is willing to spend on his/her trip. Now assume the worker wants to minimize the detour from the original path while, at the same time, maximizing the rewards collected by completing tasks; clearly two competing criteria. We call this problem the Online In-Route Task Selection (Online-IRTS) query, and we investigate it using the paradigm of skyline queries in order to systematically explore different trade-offs between earned rewards and path deviation. Because of the online nature of the problem, i.e., irrevocable decisions about which task to perform have to be made without knowledge of future tasks, it is not possible to guarantee optimal solutions for the Online-IRTS query. Therefore, we propose two heuristic approaches, one is based on local optimizations, and the other one is based on incremental solutions, along with a method to evaluate the quality of their solutions w.r.t. the optimal offline solution. Our experiments using city-scale realistic datasets show that the first approach is more effective whereas the second is more efficient, allowing one to choose which approach to use according to his/her priorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间众包中的在线路由任务选择
考虑以下场景:(a)一个工人在城市道路网络中两个地点之间的最短路径上旅行,(b)他/她愿意偏离这条路径以完成网络中的任务,(c)任务与奖励相关联,并且动态地出现和消失,即它们事先不知道,(d)工人指定了一个时间预算,该预算限制了他/她愿意在他/她的旅行中花费的总时间。现在假设工作人员想要尽量减少从原始路径绕行的路程,同时通过完成任务获得最大的奖励;显然有两个相互竞争的标准。我们把这个问题称为在线路径任务选择(Online- in - route Task Selection, Online- irts)查询,我们使用天际线查询的范式来研究它,以便系统地探索在获得奖励和路径偏差之间的不同权衡。由于问题的在线性质,也就是说,必须在不了解未来任务的情况下做出关于执行哪个任务的不可撤销的决策,因此不可能保证联机irts查询的最佳解决方案。因此,我们提出了两种启发式方法,一种基于局部优化,另一种基于增量解决方案,以及一种评估其解决方案质量的方法,而不是最优离线解决方案。我们使用城市规模的真实数据集进行的实验表明,第一种方法更有效,而第二种方法更有效,允许人们根据自己的优先级选择使用哪种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poet Distributed Spatiotemporal Trajectory Query Processing in SQL A Time-Windowed Data Structure for Spatial Density Maps Distributed Spatial-Keyword kNN Monitoring for Location-aware Pub/Sub Platooning Graph for Safer Traffic Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1