The Fallacious Objections to the Tax Treatment of Carried Interest

Douglas A. Kahn, J. Kahn
{"title":"The Fallacious Objections to the Tax Treatment of Carried Interest","authors":"Douglas A. Kahn, J. Kahn","doi":"10.5744/ftr.2017.1051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tax treatment of carried interest has become a notorious bete noire for many politicians and some academicians and practitioners. Both 2016 presidential candidates denounced the current tax treatment and vowed to change it. President Obama described the current treatment as a “tax loophole” which should be closed. Others have also characterized the current tax treatment as an abusive loophole. It is the thesis of this article that those criticisms are unfounded. To the contrary, the current tax treatment accords with sound tax policy and is proper and appropriate. Given the broad approval that attended the attacks on carried interest, a reader might well be skeptical of our claim; but if you will bear with us, we are convinced that we can sustain it.","PeriodicalId":330166,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/ftr.2017.1051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tax treatment of carried interest has become a notorious bete noire for many politicians and some academicians and practitioners. Both 2016 presidential candidates denounced the current tax treatment and vowed to change it. President Obama described the current treatment as a “tax loophole” which should be closed. Others have also characterized the current tax treatment as an abusive loophole. It is the thesis of this article that those criticisms are unfounded. To the contrary, the current tax treatment accords with sound tax policy and is proper and appropriate. Given the broad approval that attended the attacks on carried interest, a reader might well be skeptical of our claim; but if you will bear with us, we are convinced that we can sustain it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对附带权益税收处理的错误反对
对于许多政客、一些学者和从业者来说,附带权益的税收待遇已成为一个臭名昭著的问题。2016年的两位总统候选人都谴责了目前的税收待遇,并发誓要改变它。奥巴马总统称目前的待遇是一个“税收漏洞”,应该被堵上。其他人也将目前的税收待遇描述为一个滥用漏洞。这些批评是毫无根据的,这正是本文的论点。相反,现行的税收待遇符合健全的税收政策,是适当的。鉴于对附带权益的攻击获得了广泛认可,读者很可能对我们的说法持怀疑态度;但如果你们能容忍我们,我们相信我们能够维持下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misdirected Recipients of Tax Reform: Section 199A, its True Beneficiaries, and Application to Low- and Middle- Income Residents Consistent Taxation in a Cashless Society Is It Time to Eliminate Federal Corporate Income Taxes? Brief of Amici Curiae Former Government Officials in Support of Respondents, CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service Allocating COVID-19 State Aid Equitably – The Case of Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1