A CIÊNCIA QUE “NÃO PENSA” E A PROVOCAÇÃO DA NATUREZA EM HEIDEGGER

Antônio José Nascimento
{"title":"A CIÊNCIA QUE “NÃO PENSA” E A PROVOCAÇÃO DA NATUREZA EM HEIDEGGER","authors":"Antônio José Nascimento","doi":"10.18226/21784612.v27.e022012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article aims to examine the character of the theory of the real of science which, because it does not correspond exactly to a thinking for Heidegger, apprehends nature as something external to man, as a mere processable material reserve based on the plot of the mathematical framework that objectifies it in the service of technique. Therefore, denied, in its intrinsic value, the nature that modern science submits to objectifying representation is the one that is prepared for the essence of metaphysics in the unconditioned of technological exploration. Differently, however, from the current understanding, the mastery of nature with a view to the effectiveness of ensuring availability is not something that emanates from the sovereign will of the subject in dealing with artifacts and work processes, but from a machination − It will be seen here − whose essence rests in the ontotechnical way to manifest the being , or the entity of the entities, within the nihilistic productivism of metaphysics that made science an operative force of the calculism of technique. To a large extent, it was under the auspices of the modernity project that the idea that the technique was something whose control man held, as an instrument derived from scientific application, was consolidated. For this purpose, the paradigm of technoscientific rationality based on the metaphysics of Cartesian subjectivity was very helpful, considering that the world, as an image, is endeavored as a construction process forged by the scientific-mathematical representation that is, as such, an influx from the will to power of technique as a blind and tragic force that wants itself for the full fulfillment of a way of unveiling things as a calculated domain.","PeriodicalId":260095,"journal":{"name":"Conjectura filosofia e educação","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conjectura filosofia e educação","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18226/21784612.v27.e022012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This article aims to examine the character of the theory of the real of science which, because it does not correspond exactly to a thinking for Heidegger, apprehends nature as something external to man, as a mere processable material reserve based on the plot of the mathematical framework that objectifies it in the service of technique. Therefore, denied, in its intrinsic value, the nature that modern science submits to objectifying representation is the one that is prepared for the essence of metaphysics in the unconditioned of technological exploration. Differently, however, from the current understanding, the mastery of nature with a view to the effectiveness of ensuring availability is not something that emanates from the sovereign will of the subject in dealing with artifacts and work processes, but from a machination − It will be seen here − whose essence rests in the ontotechnical way to manifest the being , or the entity of the entities, within the nihilistic productivism of metaphysics that made science an operative force of the calculism of technique. To a large extent, it was under the auspices of the modernity project that the idea that the technique was something whose control man held, as an instrument derived from scientific application, was consolidated. For this purpose, the paradigm of technoscientific rationality based on the metaphysics of Cartesian subjectivity was very helpful, considering that the world, as an image, is endeavored as a construction process forged by the scientific-mathematical representation that is, as such, an influx from the will to power of technique as a blind and tragic force that wants itself for the full fulfillment of a way of unveiling things as a calculated domain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海德格尔的“不思考”科学与自然的挑衅
本文旨在考察科学实在论的特征,因为它并不完全符合海德格尔的思维,它将自然理解为人之外的东西,作为一种纯粹可处理的物质储备,基于数学框架的情节,在技术服务中将其客观化。因此,在其内在价值被否定的情况下,现代科学屈从于物化表象的本质,就是在无条件的技术探索中为形而上学的本质所准备的本质。然而,与目前的理解不同,从确保可用性的有效性的角度来看,对自然的控制并不是来自主体在处理人工制品和工作过程中的主权意志,而是来自一种机械,其本质在于以一种本体技术的方式来表现存在,或实体的实体。在形而上学的虚无主义生产主义中,它使科学成为技术演算主义的操作力量。在很大程度上,正是在现代性工程的支持下,技术作为一种源自科学应用的工具,由人类控制的观念得到了巩固。为此目的,基于笛卡尔主体性形而上学的技术科学理性范式非常有帮助,考虑到世界作为一个图像,是一个由科学数学表征所塑造的构建过程,因此,从意志到技术力量的涌入,作为一种盲目和悲剧的力量,它希望自己完全实现一种揭示事物的方式,作为一个计算的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DO CRISTÃO MORALISTA AO BUDISTA NIILISTA: REFLEXÕES SOBRE A MORAL CONTEMPORÂNEA A PARTIR DA GENEALOGIA DA MORAL DE NIETZSCHE COGNIÇÕES CORPORAIS: O SENTIDO DO OLFATO E A EXPERIÊNCIA DO SABOR O ENSINO DE FILOSOFIA NA EDUCAÇÃO BÁSICA: POSSIBILIDADES DE RESISTÊNCIA COMUNITARISMO: UMA ABORDAGEM TEÓRICA E UM ESTUDO DE CASO DIVERSIDADE, DEMOCRACIA E JUSTIÇA: AS MINORIAS POLÍTICO-CULTURAIS E A EDUCAÇÃO BÁSICA PÚBLICA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1