A. Khalsa, G. Mundis, Justin B. Ledesma, Pooria Hosseini, J. Bruffey, Stacie Nguyen, B. Akbarnia, R. Eastlack
{"title":"Radiographic and Surgical Outcomes After Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion","authors":"A. Khalsa, G. Mundis, Justin B. Ledesma, Pooria Hosseini, J. Bruffey, Stacie Nguyen, B. Akbarnia, R. Eastlack","doi":"10.5812/SOJ.81419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly being utilized in isolation to achieve a large surface-area interbody fusion with an indirect decompression for spinal stenosis. This retrospective chart review was done to determine the viability of performing stand-alone (SA) LLIF. Methods: Forty-nine patients at least 18 years of age with minimum one-year follow-up at a single institution underwent SA-LLIF using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach without further posterior surgery between 2011 and 2015. One to five-level fusions were included. Retrospective review of surgical outcomes and radiographic parameters were examined preoperatively, acutely postoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Results: Forty-nine patients (102 spinal segments) underwent SA-LLIF. Fusion levels ranged from one to five with a mean of 2.1 ± 2.1. Mean blood loss was 68 ± 63.2cc and mean surgical time was 143.4 ± 66.5 minutes. Fifty-seven percent had undergone prior spine surgery unrelated to their index procedure. Complication rate was 38.9% and reoperation rate was 20.4%. No difference in complication rates was noted between constructs with three or more levels fused versus less than three levels fused. At one-year, significant improvement was noted with pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and lumbar lordosis. Conclusions: SA-LLIF is an optional MIS treatment of stable degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis, with good one-year correction and maintenance of radiographic parameters. With complication rate of 38.9% and reoperation rate of 20.4%, true benefit of forgoing posterior supplemental fixation may be questioned.","PeriodicalId":172869,"journal":{"name":"Shafa Orthopedic Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shafa Orthopedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/SOJ.81419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objectives: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly being utilized in isolation to achieve a large surface-area interbody fusion with an indirect decompression for spinal stenosis. This retrospective chart review was done to determine the viability of performing stand-alone (SA) LLIF. Methods: Forty-nine patients at least 18 years of age with minimum one-year follow-up at a single institution underwent SA-LLIF using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach without further posterior surgery between 2011 and 2015. One to five-level fusions were included. Retrospective review of surgical outcomes and radiographic parameters were examined preoperatively, acutely postoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Results: Forty-nine patients (102 spinal segments) underwent SA-LLIF. Fusion levels ranged from one to five with a mean of 2.1 ± 2.1. Mean blood loss was 68 ± 63.2cc and mean surgical time was 143.4 ± 66.5 minutes. Fifty-seven percent had undergone prior spine surgery unrelated to their index procedure. Complication rate was 38.9% and reoperation rate was 20.4%. No difference in complication rates was noted between constructs with three or more levels fused versus less than three levels fused. At one-year, significant improvement was noted with pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and lumbar lordosis. Conclusions: SA-LLIF is an optional MIS treatment of stable degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis, with good one-year correction and maintenance of radiographic parameters. With complication rate of 38.9% and reoperation rate of 20.4%, true benefit of forgoing posterior supplemental fixation may be questioned.