Radiographic and Surgical Outcomes After Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

A. Khalsa, G. Mundis, Justin B. Ledesma, Pooria Hosseini, J. Bruffey, Stacie Nguyen, B. Akbarnia, R. Eastlack
{"title":"Radiographic and Surgical Outcomes After Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion","authors":"A. Khalsa, G. Mundis, Justin B. Ledesma, Pooria Hosseini, J. Bruffey, Stacie Nguyen, B. Akbarnia, R. Eastlack","doi":"10.5812/SOJ.81419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly being utilized in isolation to achieve a large surface-area interbody fusion with an indirect decompression for spinal stenosis. This retrospective chart review was done to determine the viability of performing stand-alone (SA) LLIF. Methods: Forty-nine patients at least 18 years of age with minimum one-year follow-up at a single institution underwent SA-LLIF using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach without further posterior surgery between 2011 and 2015. One to five-level fusions were included. Retrospective review of surgical outcomes and radiographic parameters were examined preoperatively, acutely postoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Results: Forty-nine patients (102 spinal segments) underwent SA-LLIF. Fusion levels ranged from one to five with a mean of 2.1 ± 2.1. Mean blood loss was 68 ± 63.2cc and mean surgical time was 143.4 ± 66.5 minutes. Fifty-seven percent had undergone prior spine surgery unrelated to their index procedure. Complication rate was 38.9% and reoperation rate was 20.4%. No difference in complication rates was noted between constructs with three or more levels fused versus less than three levels fused. At one-year, significant improvement was noted with pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and lumbar lordosis. Conclusions: SA-LLIF is an optional MIS treatment of stable degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis, with good one-year correction and maintenance of radiographic parameters. With complication rate of 38.9% and reoperation rate of 20.4%, true benefit of forgoing posterior supplemental fixation may be questioned.","PeriodicalId":172869,"journal":{"name":"Shafa Orthopedic Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shafa Orthopedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/SOJ.81419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly being utilized in isolation to achieve a large surface-area interbody fusion with an indirect decompression for spinal stenosis. This retrospective chart review was done to determine the viability of performing stand-alone (SA) LLIF. Methods: Forty-nine patients at least 18 years of age with minimum one-year follow-up at a single institution underwent SA-LLIF using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach without further posterior surgery between 2011 and 2015. One to five-level fusions were included. Retrospective review of surgical outcomes and radiographic parameters were examined preoperatively, acutely postoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Results: Forty-nine patients (102 spinal segments) underwent SA-LLIF. Fusion levels ranged from one to five with a mean of 2.1 ± 2.1. Mean blood loss was 68 ± 63.2cc and mean surgical time was 143.4 ± 66.5 minutes. Fifty-seven percent had undergone prior spine surgery unrelated to their index procedure. Complication rate was 38.9% and reoperation rate was 20.4%. No difference in complication rates was noted between constructs with three or more levels fused versus less than three levels fused. At one-year, significant improvement was noted with pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and lumbar lordosis. Conclusions: SA-LLIF is an optional MIS treatment of stable degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis, with good one-year correction and maintenance of radiographic parameters. With complication rate of 38.9% and reoperation rate of 20.4%, true benefit of forgoing posterior supplemental fixation may be questioned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立侧位腰椎椎体间融合术后的影像学和外科结果
目的:侧位腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)越来越多地被孤立地用于实现大面积椎体间融合术并间接减压治疗椎管狭窄症。本回顾性图表回顾是为了确定执行独立(SA) LLIF的可行性。方法:2011年至2015年,49例18岁以上患者在同一家机构接受微创手术(MIS)入路SA-LLIF治疗,无需进一步后路手术,随访时间至少1年。包括一至五级融合。回顾性回顾术前、术后急性期和术后1年的手术结果和影像学参数。结果:49例患者(102个脊柱节段)行SA-LLIF。融合程度从1级到5级,平均2.1±2.1。平均失血量68±63.2cc,平均手术时间143.4±66.5 min。57%的人之前接受过与他们的手术无关的脊柱手术。并发症发生率为38.9%,再手术率为20.4%。三个或更多节段融合与少于三个节段融合的假体间并发症发生率无差异。一年后,骨盆倾斜、骨盆发生率和腰椎前凸均有显著改善。结论:SA-LLIF是一种可选的MIS治疗稳定性退行性椎间盘疾病和椎管狭窄,具有良好的一年矫正和影像学参数维持。并发症发生率为38.9%,再手术率为20.4%,放弃后路辅助固定的真正益处值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gorham’s Disease of Cervicothoracic Spine: Report of a Case Irreducible Patellar Dislocation; Incarcerated into a Distal Femur Fracture: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Extranodal Castleman Disease of Lower Extremities: A Case Report of a Rare Presentation Comparison of Proximal Femur Locking Compression Plate and Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Sub-Trochanteric Fractures Bilateral Femoral Neck Stress Fractures in a Patient with Severe Coxa Vara, Morbid Obesity and Osteomalacia: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1