Impacts of Fiscal Systems on Oil Projects Valuation

R. Lucchesi
{"title":"Impacts of Fiscal Systems on Oil Projects Valuation","authors":"R. Lucchesi","doi":"10.4043/29568-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite increasing demand for cleaner energy around the world, oil is still the main global energy source and this scenario will not change in the short term. Together with natural gas, they supply 57% of world primary energy demand (BP, 2018). Therefore, if a country wants to benefit from having its hydrocarbon reserves developed to generate wealth, it is crucial to enable economic conditions for such. This study aims to show the impact that distinct fiscal systems adopted by each country can have on the valuation of an oil field and its commercial feasibility, from an international oil company perspective. Fiscal terms define, among other things, how revenue from oil production is shared between operators and the host country. To investigate such topic, a deepwater offshore oil development project was valuated using discounted cash flow method. Sixteen scenarios were created, considering a combination of four distinct field sizes under four fiscal systems, selected from some of the world's top oil producing countries. For each scenario, internal rate of return (IRR), which indicates the project's economic return for the operator, and government take (GT), which indicates how much of the oil revenue is directed for the host country, were calculated. Findings show very distinct results in each scenario, with IRR for operators ranging between 8 and 21% and government take between 57% and 84%. Considering that project returns should always be higher than a company's capital cost, in some scenarios the discovery would not be declared commercial. Results also show that, in general, large oil development projects in countries with tax/royalty system present a higher return for the operators, while production-sharing contracts tend to generate a higher government take. This shows that the same oil field, under same geological conditions, can offer very different economic returns to the operators and host governments, depending on the fiscal system in place. In some cases, the fiscal system has such an impact on the economic feasibility of the project, that it may even prevent the discovery to be declared as commercial and, therefore, not be developed and booked as proven reserves. The main takeaway of this study is that understanding fiscal systems is an essential tool for operators to properly evaluate its projects and one of the most important features governments can adjust to attract private investment to their oil industries.","PeriodicalId":214691,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29568-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite increasing demand for cleaner energy around the world, oil is still the main global energy source and this scenario will not change in the short term. Together with natural gas, they supply 57% of world primary energy demand (BP, 2018). Therefore, if a country wants to benefit from having its hydrocarbon reserves developed to generate wealth, it is crucial to enable economic conditions for such. This study aims to show the impact that distinct fiscal systems adopted by each country can have on the valuation of an oil field and its commercial feasibility, from an international oil company perspective. Fiscal terms define, among other things, how revenue from oil production is shared between operators and the host country. To investigate such topic, a deepwater offshore oil development project was valuated using discounted cash flow method. Sixteen scenarios were created, considering a combination of four distinct field sizes under four fiscal systems, selected from some of the world's top oil producing countries. For each scenario, internal rate of return (IRR), which indicates the project's economic return for the operator, and government take (GT), which indicates how much of the oil revenue is directed for the host country, were calculated. Findings show very distinct results in each scenario, with IRR for operators ranging between 8 and 21% and government take between 57% and 84%. Considering that project returns should always be higher than a company's capital cost, in some scenarios the discovery would not be declared commercial. Results also show that, in general, large oil development projects in countries with tax/royalty system present a higher return for the operators, while production-sharing contracts tend to generate a higher government take. This shows that the same oil field, under same geological conditions, can offer very different economic returns to the operators and host governments, depending on the fiscal system in place. In some cases, the fiscal system has such an impact on the economic feasibility of the project, that it may even prevent the discovery to be declared as commercial and, therefore, not be developed and booked as proven reserves. The main takeaway of this study is that understanding fiscal systems is an essential tool for operators to properly evaluate its projects and one of the most important features governments can adjust to attract private investment to their oil industries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政制度对石油项目估值的影响
尽管世界各地对清洁能源的需求不断增加,但石油仍然是全球主要的能源来源,这种情况在短期内不会改变。与天然气一起,它们提供了57%的世界一次能源需求(BP, 2018)。因此,如果一个国家想要通过开发碳氢化合物储备来创造财富,那么为其创造经济条件是至关重要的。本研究旨在表明,从国际石油公司的角度来看,每个国家采用的不同财政制度可能对油田的估值及其商业可行性产生影响。除其他事项外,财政术语定义了石油生产收入如何在运营商和东道国之间分配。为探讨这一问题,采用折现现金流法对某深海石油开发项目进行了价值评估。在四种财政制度下,考虑到四种不同的油田规模,从一些世界顶级石油生产国中选择了16种方案。对于每种情况,计算了内部收益率(IRR)和政府收益(GT),前者表明了项目对运营商的经济回报,后者表明了石油收入中有多少流向了东道国。研究结果显示,每种情况下的结果都非常不同,运营商的内部收益率在8%至21%之间,政府的内部收益率在57%至84%之间。考虑到项目回报应始终高于公司的资本成本,在某些情况下,该发现不会被宣布为商业发现。研究结果还表明,一般来说,在实行税收/特许权使用费制度的国家,大型石油开发项目为运营商提供了更高的回报,而生产分成合同往往会产生更高的政府收益。这表明,同一油田,在相同的地质条件下,根据财政制度的不同,可以为运营商和东道国政府提供截然不同的经济回报。在某些情况下,财政制度对项目的经济可行性有如此大的影响,甚至可能阻止该发现被宣布为商业发现,从而不能作为探明储量进行开发和登记。本研究的主要结论是,了解财政制度是运营商正确评估其项目的重要工具,也是政府可以调整以吸引私人投资到其石油行业的最重要特征之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental Sensitivity Modeling and Site Characterization The Subsea Revolution: Execution Excellence Through Standardization Sand Control Completions for Raven Field in Egypt Observations and Modelling of Deep-Water Circulation in the Colombian Caribbean Recalibration of Axial Pile Capacity Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1