Regmentation: A New View of Image Segmentation and Registration

Marius Erdt, S. Steger, G. Sakas
{"title":"Regmentation: A New View of Image Segmentation and Registration","authors":"Marius Erdt, S. Steger, G. Sakas","doi":"10.5166/JROI-4-1-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image segmentation and registration have been the two major areas of research in the medical imaging community for decades and still are. In the context of radiation oncology, segmentation and registration methods are widely used for target structure definition such as prostate or head and neck lymph node areas. In the past two years, 45% of all articles published in the most important medical imaging journals and conferences have presented either segmentation or registration methods. In the literature, both categories are treated rather separately even though they have much in common. Registration techniques are used to solve segmentation tasks (e.g. atlas based methods) and vice versa (e.g. segmentation of structures used in a landmark based registration). This article reviews the literature on image segmentation methods by introducing a novel taxonomy based on the amount of shape knowledge being incorporated in the segmentation process. Based on that, we argue that all global shape prior segmentation methods are identical to image registration methods and that such methods thus cannot be characterized as either image segmentation or registration methods. Therefore we propose a new class of methods that are able solve both segmentation and registration tasks. We call it regmentation. Quantified on a survey of the current state of the art medical imaging literature, it turns out that 25% of the methods are pure registration methods, 46% are pure segmentation methods and 29% are regmentation methods. The new view on image segmentation and registration provides a consistent taxonomy in this context and emphasizes the importance of regmentation in current medical image processing research and radiation oncology image-guided applications.","PeriodicalId":426862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Oncology Informatics","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Oncology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5166/JROI-4-1-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Image segmentation and registration have been the two major areas of research in the medical imaging community for decades and still are. In the context of radiation oncology, segmentation and registration methods are widely used for target structure definition such as prostate or head and neck lymph node areas. In the past two years, 45% of all articles published in the most important medical imaging journals and conferences have presented either segmentation or registration methods. In the literature, both categories are treated rather separately even though they have much in common. Registration techniques are used to solve segmentation tasks (e.g. atlas based methods) and vice versa (e.g. segmentation of structures used in a landmark based registration). This article reviews the literature on image segmentation methods by introducing a novel taxonomy based on the amount of shape knowledge being incorporated in the segmentation process. Based on that, we argue that all global shape prior segmentation methods are identical to image registration methods and that such methods thus cannot be characterized as either image segmentation or registration methods. Therefore we propose a new class of methods that are able solve both segmentation and registration tasks. We call it regmentation. Quantified on a survey of the current state of the art medical imaging literature, it turns out that 25% of the methods are pure registration methods, 46% are pure segmentation methods and 29% are regmentation methods. The new view on image segmentation and registration provides a consistent taxonomy in this context and emphasizes the importance of regmentation in current medical image processing research and radiation oncology image-guided applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图像分割与配准的新视角
几十年来,图像分割和配准一直是医学影像界的两个主要研究领域。在放射肿瘤学的背景下,广泛使用分割和配准方法来定义靶结构,如前列腺或头颈部淋巴结区域。在过去两年中,在最重要的医学成像期刊和会议上发表的所有文章中,有45%的文章采用了分割或配准方法。在文献中,这两个类别被分开对待,尽管它们有很多共同之处。注册技术用于解决分割任务(例如,基于地图集的方法),反之亦然(例如,基于地标的注册中使用的结构分割)。本文回顾了图像分割方法的文献,介绍了一种新的基于形状知识量的分类方法。基于此,我们认为所有全局形状先验分割方法都与图像配准方法相同,因此这些方法不能被描述为图像分割方法或配准方法。因此,我们提出了一种能够同时解决分割和配准任务的新方法。我们称之为调控。通过对目前医学影像学文献的调查,量化发现,25%的方法是纯配准方法,46%是纯分割方法,29%是重构方法。图像分割和配准的新观点在此背景下提供了一致的分类,并强调了分割在当前医学图像处理研究和放射肿瘤学图像引导应用中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient self-reported follow-up for radiation oncology patients during COVID-19: feasibility and patient-clinician agreement Multilayer Perceptron Analysis of Radiomics to Predict Local Recurrence of Lung Cancer After Radiotherapy Data-driven shared decision-making: a paradigm shift How to PROceed? Reviewing obstacles and perspectives in patient-centered digital care in radiation oncology Procedural Creation of Medical Reports with Hierarchical Information Processing in Radiation Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1