Comparing four case studies on Bohr-Mandel characteristics using ODC

R. Chillarege
{"title":"Comparing four case studies on Bohr-Mandel characteristics using ODC","authors":"R. Chillarege","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses four case studies to examine the difference in properties of Bohr-Mandel bugs. The mechanism used to differentiate Bohr versus Mandel bugs are the ODC Triggers that was developed in a previous study on this subject. In this study, the method is extended to reflect on two additional dimensions. First, on the customer perceived impact. And, second, on how these change between their manifestation in production or the field usage versus late stage development or quality assurance testing. This paper: ; Compares Bohr and Mandel bugs rates between customer/field usage and pre-release system testing. ; Finds that Mandel bugs predominantly have a Reliability-Availability-Serviceability (RAS) Impact. ; Finds that Mandel bugs, rarely, if ever have a Functional Impact. ; Finds these studies predict Mandel bug rates consistent with other studies. ; Finds that pre-release testing found very few Mandel bugs (<;10%).","PeriodicalId":332420,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper uses four case studies to examine the difference in properties of Bohr-Mandel bugs. The mechanism used to differentiate Bohr versus Mandel bugs are the ODC Triggers that was developed in a previous study on this subject. In this study, the method is extended to reflect on two additional dimensions. First, on the customer perceived impact. And, second, on how these change between their manifestation in production or the field usage versus late stage development or quality assurance testing. This paper: ; Compares Bohr and Mandel bugs rates between customer/field usage and pre-release system testing. ; Finds that Mandel bugs predominantly have a Reliability-Availability-Serviceability (RAS) Impact. ; Finds that Mandel bugs, rarely, if ever have a Functional Impact. ; Finds these studies predict Mandel bug rates consistent with other studies. ; Finds that pre-release testing found very few Mandel bugs (<;10%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较使用ODC分析玻尔-曼德尔特征的四个案例
本文用四个案例研究来考察玻尔-曼德尔错误在性质上的差异。用于区分玻尔错误和曼德尔错误的机制是ODC触发器,这是在之前关于这个主题的研究中开发的。在本研究中,该方法被扩展到反映两个额外的维度。第一,对客户感知的影响。其次,在生产或现场使用与后期开发或质量保证测试之间,这些变化是如何变化的。本文:;比较客户/领域使用和发布前系统测试之间的Bohr和Mandel bug率。;发现Mandel错误主要具有可靠性-可用性-可维护性(RAS)影响。;发现Mandel bug很少有功能影响。;发现这些研究预测的曼德尔虫率与其他研究一致。;发现发布前测试发现很少的Mandel错误(< 10%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bug localisation through diverse sources of information A chain of accountabilities in open systems based on assured entrustments Estimating response time distribution of server application in software aging phenomenon Safety assessment of software-intensive medical devices: Introducing a safety quality model approach Detection of missing requirements using base requirements pairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1