Governance and Trust in the Sharing Economy: Issues and Solutions along the Social-Economic Exchange Continuum

Michael Moorhouse, June Cotte, M. Ding, X. Wang
{"title":"Governance and Trust in the Sharing Economy: Issues and Solutions along the Social-Economic Exchange Continuum","authors":"Michael Moorhouse, June Cotte, M. Ding, X. Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3730391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sharing economy is a growing sector that raises important questions for governance, trust, and the impact of the intersection of commercial and social motives. However, governance research in this context is relatively limited, and generally focused on the consumer perspective.<br><br>The authors take a triadic approach to governance that explores the relationships between platforms, providers, and consumers. Leveraging governance theories from marketing and management, as well as agency and social exchange theories, the authors develop a conceptual model of formal and relational governance mechanisms in the sharing economy. Through qualitative in-depth interviews and open-ended survey questions, and a field study using text analysis the authors validate their model and demonstrate that economic-focused platforms favor formal governance mechanisms and develop institution-based trust in the platform, while social-focused platforms favor relational governance mechanisms and lead to interpersonal trust in the membership. Hybrid platforms feature both forms of governance but formal mechanisms dominate. Further, the authors describe the implications for managers to deal with exchange and governance problems to prevent platform churn (customer and provider defection).","PeriodicalId":319022,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Networks eJournal","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Networks eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3730391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sharing economy is a growing sector that raises important questions for governance, trust, and the impact of the intersection of commercial and social motives. However, governance research in this context is relatively limited, and generally focused on the consumer perspective.

The authors take a triadic approach to governance that explores the relationships between platforms, providers, and consumers. Leveraging governance theories from marketing and management, as well as agency and social exchange theories, the authors develop a conceptual model of formal and relational governance mechanisms in the sharing economy. Through qualitative in-depth interviews and open-ended survey questions, and a field study using text analysis the authors validate their model and demonstrate that economic-focused platforms favor formal governance mechanisms and develop institution-based trust in the platform, while social-focused platforms favor relational governance mechanisms and lead to interpersonal trust in the membership. Hybrid platforms feature both forms of governance but formal mechanisms dominate. Further, the authors describe the implications for managers to deal with exchange and governance problems to prevent platform churn (customer and provider defection).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享经济中的治理与信任:社会-经济交换连续体中的问题与解决方案
共享经济是一个不断发展的领域,它对治理、信任以及商业和社会动机交叉的影响提出了重要问题。然而,在这方面的治理研究相对有限,并且通常侧重于消费者的视角。作者采用了一种三合一的治理方法,探索了平台、提供者和消费者之间的关系。利用来自市场营销和管理的治理理论,以及代理和社会交换理论,作者开发了共享经济中正式和关系治理机制的概念模型。通过定性深度访谈和开放式调查问题,以及文本分析的实地研究,作者验证了他们的模型,并证明以经济为中心的平台倾向于正式的治理机制,并在平台中形成基于制度的信任,而以社会为中心的平台倾向于关系治理机制,并导致成员之间的人际信任。混合平台具有两种形式的治理,但正式机制占主导地位。此外,作者还描述了管理人员处理交换和治理问题以防止平台流失(客户和提供商叛逃)的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Education-Occupation Mismatch and Social Networks for Hispanics in the US: Role of Citizenship Monitoring Network Changes in Social Media Platform Liability and Innovation The Bipartisan Case for Labeling as a Content Moderation Method: Findings from a National Survey Dealer Networks and the Cost of Immediacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1