A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Enterprise Engineering Methodologies

A. Albani, David Raber, R. Winter
{"title":"A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Enterprise Engineering Methodologies","authors":"A. Albani, David Raber, R. Winter","doi":"10.18417/emisa.11.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the design and engineering of enterprises, several methodologies are available that successfully address certain aspects of design problems in enterprises or certain domains. In real-world design problems it is essential to choose the right means to reach the desired ends. Often it is not apparent which methodology is best chosen in order to reach desired ends. Additionally, real-world design problems often require several such methodologies to be combined because multiple aspects have to be covered and/or the problem combines characteristics of several domains. In order to allow for a systematically understanding and comparison of methodologies and for a facilitation of their composition (if necessary), we propose a general conceptual framework. The framework allows analysing the essential concepts and constituent parts of enterprise engineering methodologies. The resulting analysis supports decisions making concerning which methodology or which combinations of methodologies to apply to the given design problem. To demonstrate its usefulness, we first analyse the concepts and building blocks of two design and engineering methodologies on that basis. Second, we show how these two methodologies, which are based on very similar concepts -- as resulted from the analysis by applying the conceptual framework -- can be combined in order to derive at a complete solution for a given design problem.","PeriodicalId":186216,"journal":{"name":"Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model.","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.11.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

For the design and engineering of enterprises, several methodologies are available that successfully address certain aspects of design problems in enterprises or certain domains. In real-world design problems it is essential to choose the right means to reach the desired ends. Often it is not apparent which methodology is best chosen in order to reach desired ends. Additionally, real-world design problems often require several such methodologies to be combined because multiple aspects have to be covered and/or the problem combines characteristics of several domains. In order to allow for a systematically understanding and comparison of methodologies and for a facilitation of their composition (if necessary), we propose a general conceptual framework. The framework allows analysing the essential concepts and constituent parts of enterprise engineering methodologies. The resulting analysis supports decisions making concerning which methodology or which combinations of methodologies to apply to the given design problem. To demonstrate its usefulness, we first analyse the concepts and building blocks of two design and engineering methodologies on that basis. Second, we show how these two methodologies, which are based on very similar concepts -- as resulted from the analysis by applying the conceptual framework -- can be combined in order to derive at a complete solution for a given design problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析企业工程方法论的概念框架
对于企业的设计和工程,有几种方法可以成功地解决企业或某些领域中设计问题的某些方面。在现实世界的设计问题中,选择正确的方法来达到预期的目的是至关重要的。通常,为了达到预期的目的,选择哪种方法是最好的,这并不明显。此外,现实世界的设计问题通常需要结合几个这样的方法,因为必须涵盖多个方面和/或问题结合了几个领域的特征。为了系统地理解和比较方法,并促进其组成(如有必要),我们提出了一个总体概念框架。该框架允许分析企业工程方法的基本概念和组成部分。由此产生的分析支持了有关将哪种方法或哪种方法组合应用于给定设计问题的决策制定。为了证明它的有用性,我们首先在此基础上分析两种设计和工程方法的概念和构建模块。其次,我们展示了这两种基于非常相似概念的方法——通过应用概念框架进行分析得出的结果——如何结合起来,以便为给定的设计问题推导出完整的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Catchword: Blockchains and Enterprise Modeling Decentralized Business Process Control using Blockchain An experience report from two applications: Food Supply Chain and Car Registration Balancing Patient Care and Paperwork Automatic Task Enactment and Comprehensive Documentation in Treatment Processes Process Modeling in Decentralized Organizations Utilizing Blockchain Consensus Blockchain Technologies in Enterprise Modeling and Enterprise Information Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1