Check Cystoscopy Follow-up Practice for Low-Risk (pTa) Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in the United Kingdom

Ibrahim Al Khafaji, Omar Al-Mula Abed
{"title":"Check Cystoscopy Follow-up Practice for Low-Risk (pTa) Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in the United Kingdom","authors":"Ibrahim Al Khafaji, Omar Al-Mula Abed","doi":"10.22374/jeleu.v5i3.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To identify the best practice policy and guideline for surveillance with check cystoscopies follow up for low-risk pTa urothelial bladder tumour and to identify the recurrence rate and the progression rate of low-risk urothelial bladder tumour and how safe is it to discharge them at 1- versus 5-years of follow up.Primary outcome: The primary goal is to assess both the rate of recurrence and rate of progression of low-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Carcinoma (NMIBC) during the first 5-year after initial Trans-Urethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (TURBT) and how safe is to discharge this class of group after one year versus five years of surveillance and compare it to previous reports. \nSecondary outcome: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up scheme, if this is deemeda safe practice to follow. \nMethodology: It is a single centre, retrospective review of all low-risk NMIBC patients diagnosed with low-risk bladder tumors at our Trust between 2012 and 2014 from our local urological cancer multi-disciplinary team (MDT) registry and ensured a 5-year time-lapse from diagnosis. Histology grade and staging from the first TURBT, receiving of mitomycin within 24 hrs following the initial TURBT, the timing of cystoscopy follow-up, cystoscopy findings (evidence of recurrence), further procedures (bladder biopsy, fulguration or TURBT), histology of further procedures, recurrence rate and time from the first TURBT to discharge to primary care are reviewed and analysed. \nResult: Our initial review revealed a high likelihood of recurrence (33.9%) in the low-risk NMIBC patients after 12 months of being cancer free. It also demonstrated that there is further progression in (23.8%) of those who had a later recurrence despite being asymptomatic. \nConclusion: We would recommend a 5-year follow-up surveillance and further national collaboration to audit this patient subgroup to define a safe period of cystoscopic follow-up for these patients and bring further evidence for NICE to build up their recommendations.","PeriodicalId":136362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22374/jeleu.v5i3.155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the best practice policy and guideline for surveillance with check cystoscopies follow up for low-risk pTa urothelial bladder tumour and to identify the recurrence rate and the progression rate of low-risk urothelial bladder tumour and how safe is it to discharge them at 1- versus 5-years of follow up.Primary outcome: The primary goal is to assess both the rate of recurrence and rate of progression of low-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Carcinoma (NMIBC) during the first 5-year after initial Trans-Urethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (TURBT) and how safe is to discharge this class of group after one year versus five years of surveillance and compare it to previous reports. Secondary outcome: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a reduced follow-up scheme, if this is deemeda safe practice to follow. Methodology: It is a single centre, retrospective review of all low-risk NMIBC patients diagnosed with low-risk bladder tumors at our Trust between 2012 and 2014 from our local urological cancer multi-disciplinary team (MDT) registry and ensured a 5-year time-lapse from diagnosis. Histology grade and staging from the first TURBT, receiving of mitomycin within 24 hrs following the initial TURBT, the timing of cystoscopy follow-up, cystoscopy findings (evidence of recurrence), further procedures (bladder biopsy, fulguration or TURBT), histology of further procedures, recurrence rate and time from the first TURBT to discharge to primary care are reviewed and analysed. Result: Our initial review revealed a high likelihood of recurrence (33.9%) in the low-risk NMIBC patients after 12 months of being cancer free. It also demonstrated that there is further progression in (23.8%) of those who had a later recurrence despite being asymptomatic. Conclusion: We would recommend a 5-year follow-up surveillance and further national collaboration to audit this patient subgroup to define a safe period of cystoscopic follow-up for these patients and bring further evidence for NICE to build up their recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查膀胱镜随访实践低风险(pTa)非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌在英国
目的:确定低风险pTa尿路上皮性膀胱肿瘤检查膀胱镜随访监测的最佳实践政策和指南,确定低风险pTa尿路上皮性膀胱肿瘤的复发率和进展率,以及随访1年与5年出院的安全性。主要结局:主要目的是评估低风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)在最初经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)后最初5年内的复发率和进展率,以及在1年和5年监测后出院的安全性,并将其与之前的报告进行比较。次要结局:评估减少随访方案的成本效益,如果这被认为是一种安全的做法。方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性的研究,研究对象是2012年至2014年在我们的信托基金会诊断为低风险膀胱肿瘤的所有低风险NMIBC患者,这些患者来自我们当地的泌尿系统癌症多学科团队(MDT)登记,并确保从诊断到5年的时间间隔。回顾和分析了首次TURBT的组织学分级和分期、首次TURBT后24小时内接受丝裂霉素治疗、膀胱镜随访时间、膀胱镜检查结果(复发证据)、进一步手术(膀胱活检、电灼或TURBT)、进一步手术的组织学、复发率以及从首次TURBT到出院到初级保健的时间。结果:我们的初步回顾显示,在无癌12个月后,低风险NMIBC患者的复发率很高(33.9%)。研究还表明,尽管无症状,但后来复发的患者(23.8%)有进一步的进展。结论:我们建议进行5年的随访监测,并进一步开展国家合作,对这一患者亚组进行审计,以确定这些患者的膀胱镜随访安全期,并为NICE提供进一步的证据,以建立他们的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inverted Y Ureteral Duplication with Distal Obstructing Calculi in the Ectopic Ureter in the Prostatic Urethra Post-operative Events with Post-operative Day One Stent Removal after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Teflon Injections (STING) Mimicking Distal Ureteric Stones Proceedings of the Welsh Urological Society Annual Meeting The Role of the ClearPetra Suction Access Sheath and UROFINO Disposable Ureteroscope as an Alternative to PCNL/Conventional Flexible Ureteroscopy for a Large Renal Pelvis Stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1