J. Hayasaka, S. Sarukawa, H. Itoh, Y. Takai, M. Kusama, Y. Mori, A. Katsumata
{"title":"Systematizing mandibular reconstruction using the resin frame method","authors":"J. Hayasaka, S. Sarukawa, H. Itoh, Y. Takai, M. Kusama, Y. Mori, A. Katsumata","doi":"10.5348/100029D01JH2018OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aims: Oral tumors are the most frequent diseases that lead to mandibular defects, but because they are so rare, it is difficult to obtain the necessary large capital investment to establish and introduce a mandibular reconstruction system. Therefore, we developed the Resin Frame method within the current facilities that objectively increases mandibular reproducibility without requiring advanced techniques. Methods: Subjects comprised 25 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction by the resin frame method in the Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Jichi Medical University Hospital between October 2013 and August 2015, and 25 patients who underwent the mandibular reconstruction by the conventional method between September 2007 and November 2011. All mandibles were reconstructed using fibula or iliac bones with a reconstruction plate. The computed tomography (CT) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data before and after the operation were saved. Then, the layer function was used to fuse the pre- and postoperative CT images. Based on measured area, the concordance rate that is matching percentages between pre- and postoperative mandibles were calculated. We evaluated the difference between the concordance rate of the Resin Frame method and the conventional method of mandibular reconstruction. Results: Concordance rates for the resin frame method and conventional surgery were 75.09±6.09% and 67.39±13.44%, respectively, showing a significant difference (p=0.032, p lessthan 0.05). Conclusion: The resin frame method represents a mandibular reconstruction system that increases reproduction accuracy and can be implemented at current facilities using simple, objective techniques. \n","PeriodicalId":126789,"journal":{"name":"Edorium Journal of Dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edorium Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100029D01JH2018OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Aims: Oral tumors are the most frequent diseases that lead to mandibular defects, but because they are so rare, it is difficult to obtain the necessary large capital investment to establish and introduce a mandibular reconstruction system. Therefore, we developed the Resin Frame method within the current facilities that objectively increases mandibular reproducibility without requiring advanced techniques. Methods: Subjects comprised 25 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction by the resin frame method in the Department of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Jichi Medical University Hospital between October 2013 and August 2015, and 25 patients who underwent the mandibular reconstruction by the conventional method between September 2007 and November 2011. All mandibles were reconstructed using fibula or iliac bones with a reconstruction plate. The computed tomography (CT) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data before and after the operation were saved. Then, the layer function was used to fuse the pre- and postoperative CT images. Based on measured area, the concordance rate that is matching percentages between pre- and postoperative mandibles were calculated. We evaluated the difference between the concordance rate of the Resin Frame method and the conventional method of mandibular reconstruction. Results: Concordance rates for the resin frame method and conventional surgery were 75.09±6.09% and 67.39±13.44%, respectively, showing a significant difference (p=0.032, p lessthan 0.05). Conclusion: The resin frame method represents a mandibular reconstruction system that increases reproduction accuracy and can be implemented at current facilities using simple, objective techniques.
目的:口腔肿瘤是导致下颌骨缺损最常见的疾病,但由于其罕见,很难获得建立和引入下颌骨重建系统所需的大量资金投入。因此,我们开发了树脂框架方法在目前的设施客观上增加了下颌骨的可重复性,而不需要先进的技术。方法:选取2013年10月~ 2015年8月在济济医科大学附属医院口腔颌面外科采用树脂框架法进行下颌骨重建的患者25例,以及2007年9月~ 2011年11月采用常规方法进行下颌骨重建的患者25例。所有下颌骨均采用腓骨或髂骨重建钢板重建。保存手术前后的CT (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine)数据。然后,利用层函数对术前和术后CT图像进行融合。在测量面积的基础上,计算出前后下颌骨的一致性率,即匹配百分比。我们评估树脂框架法与常规下颌骨重建方法的一致性差异。结果:树脂框架法与常规手术的符合率分别为75.09±6.09%和67.39±13.44%,差异有统计学意义(p=0.032, p < 0.05)。结论:树脂框架方法代表了一种下颌骨重建系统,提高了复制精度,可以在现有设施中使用简单,客观的技术实现。