The Anau Seal and the Questions It Raises

Helen Wang, W. Tao
{"title":"The Anau Seal and the Questions It Raises","authors":"Helen Wang, W. Tao","doi":"10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.302555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In June 2000 a USA-Turkmen archaeological team excavating at the Anau site in southern Turkmenistan came across a seal, made of jet or lignite, bearing an apparently unknown script.1 The discovery aroused great interest in the Western press, which published special features about this “first word from Asia’s lost civilization” in April and May 2001.2 The seal immediately caught the attention of Chinese academics, and a number of articles swiftly appeared in Zhongguo wenwu bao [China Cultural Relics News].3 The Chinese scholars recognised this as a significant discovery, one that could not be ignored in the study of the origins of seals and writing in China. Additionally, it might throw new light on the early cultural exchanges between China and Central Asia. However, there are a number of unresolved problems regarding the context of the find, its date, and possible interpretations. In this paper, we will re-examine some of the issues. In order to pursue the question further, we will look more broadly at the archaeology of Central Asia and China, and in particular at the development of Chinese seals and at comparable examples from Chinese Central Asia (Xinjiang). The Anau site is located on the plateau north of the Kopet Mountains on the borders between Turkmenistan and Iran. It occupies a strategic location, at the crossroads of the ancient civilizations of Central Asia, Western Asia and India. The site was first discovered by General A.V. Komarov in 1880, and the first excavations, by geologist Raphael Pumpelly (1873-1959) and archaeologist Hubert Schmidt (1864-1933), began in the early twentieth century.4 Archaeologists from the Soviet Union soon became active in this region, working at the Anau site and the related sites of Namazga-depe, Altyn-depe and Kara-depe. The finds from these sites are typically representative of Chalcolithic and Bronze Age civilizations, and include human figures, textiles, ceramics and metalware. These Bronze Age sites have now been classified as the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC) and the periodization is currently determined according to the evidence of type sites, such as Namazga-depe.5 The early phase of the Anau culture (Anau IA) pre-dates the Chalcolithic, but a small quantity of copper ore has been found at Anau. Namazga-depe Phases I-III are characterised by the combined Bronze and Stone Age (37002500 BCE), and Phases IV-VI by the Bronze Age (2500-1000 BCE). As far as the development of seals is concerned, it is particularly noteworthy that terracotta seals have been found at Karadepe, which belongs to the Namazga-depe Phase III (3000-2500 BCE).6 The designs on the seals resemble a cross, and similar designs have also been found on pots from the site. Seals made of copper and stone have also been found at Shahr-i-Sokhta, a site with a similar date and also in southern Turkmenistan.7 The same cross designs are found on these seals, as well as animal symbols. Once in the Bronze Age, for example at the Altyn-depe site, there is a notable increase in the quantity of seals made of bronze and other metals, such as silver.8 The designs on these seals indicate that they follow on from the earlier seals. However, there are also some designs that look rather like proto-writing. Although we cannot be absolutely certain, some marks appear to show links between the bronze cultures of the Iranian Plateau and the Indus Valley civilizations.9 Seals of this period usually have a small perforated boss on the reverse, or a hole on the side, through which to thread a string, and no knob on the reverse. Similar seals have also been found in Afghanistan.10 In the 1990s, following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Turkmenistan swiftly set about establishing joint projects with foreign archaeologists. In 1995 the US and Turkmenistan signed a memorandum of understanding for joint excavations at the Anau site over a five-year period. This co-operation was very successful and a new memorandum was signed to enable the project to continue between 2002 and 2006.The directors of the project were Fredrik T. Hiebert of Pennsylvania University and Kakamurad Kurbansakhatov of the Turkmenistan Cultural Heritage Centre.11 The Anau seal was unearthed during excavations in 2000.12 At first, the discovery did not attract particular attention. At the time, the excavations were focussed on the structural remains in the southern part of the site, which seemed to correspond with Phases IV and V of the Namazga-depe culture, with dates between 2500-1600 BCE. The jet seal was recovered by screening from the remains of a room built of clay bricks and with a stone paved doorway. Associated finds include small stone tools, pottery and fragments of human figurines. It is worth stressing that the archaeologists established that this room had had been altered many times and that it had served various functions. It probably started out as a storehouse, and was later used as a workshop. The floor, walls and steps all have marks showing different periods of use. Furthermore, there was an open-air stove in the courtyard on the southern side of the house, in which a large number of round pieces of clay were found (perhaps once used to seal urns?). Carbon dating on","PeriodicalId":227814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inner Asian Art and Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JIAAA.2.302555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In June 2000 a USA-Turkmen archaeological team excavating at the Anau site in southern Turkmenistan came across a seal, made of jet or lignite, bearing an apparently unknown script.1 The discovery aroused great interest in the Western press, which published special features about this “first word from Asia’s lost civilization” in April and May 2001.2 The seal immediately caught the attention of Chinese academics, and a number of articles swiftly appeared in Zhongguo wenwu bao [China Cultural Relics News].3 The Chinese scholars recognised this as a significant discovery, one that could not be ignored in the study of the origins of seals and writing in China. Additionally, it might throw new light on the early cultural exchanges between China and Central Asia. However, there are a number of unresolved problems regarding the context of the find, its date, and possible interpretations. In this paper, we will re-examine some of the issues. In order to pursue the question further, we will look more broadly at the archaeology of Central Asia and China, and in particular at the development of Chinese seals and at comparable examples from Chinese Central Asia (Xinjiang). The Anau site is located on the plateau north of the Kopet Mountains on the borders between Turkmenistan and Iran. It occupies a strategic location, at the crossroads of the ancient civilizations of Central Asia, Western Asia and India. The site was first discovered by General A.V. Komarov in 1880, and the first excavations, by geologist Raphael Pumpelly (1873-1959) and archaeologist Hubert Schmidt (1864-1933), began in the early twentieth century.4 Archaeologists from the Soviet Union soon became active in this region, working at the Anau site and the related sites of Namazga-depe, Altyn-depe and Kara-depe. The finds from these sites are typically representative of Chalcolithic and Bronze Age civilizations, and include human figures, textiles, ceramics and metalware. These Bronze Age sites have now been classified as the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC) and the periodization is currently determined according to the evidence of type sites, such as Namazga-depe.5 The early phase of the Anau culture (Anau IA) pre-dates the Chalcolithic, but a small quantity of copper ore has been found at Anau. Namazga-depe Phases I-III are characterised by the combined Bronze and Stone Age (37002500 BCE), and Phases IV-VI by the Bronze Age (2500-1000 BCE). As far as the development of seals is concerned, it is particularly noteworthy that terracotta seals have been found at Karadepe, which belongs to the Namazga-depe Phase III (3000-2500 BCE).6 The designs on the seals resemble a cross, and similar designs have also been found on pots from the site. Seals made of copper and stone have also been found at Shahr-i-Sokhta, a site with a similar date and also in southern Turkmenistan.7 The same cross designs are found on these seals, as well as animal symbols. Once in the Bronze Age, for example at the Altyn-depe site, there is a notable increase in the quantity of seals made of bronze and other metals, such as silver.8 The designs on these seals indicate that they follow on from the earlier seals. However, there are also some designs that look rather like proto-writing. Although we cannot be absolutely certain, some marks appear to show links between the bronze cultures of the Iranian Plateau and the Indus Valley civilizations.9 Seals of this period usually have a small perforated boss on the reverse, or a hole on the side, through which to thread a string, and no knob on the reverse. Similar seals have also been found in Afghanistan.10 In the 1990s, following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Turkmenistan swiftly set about establishing joint projects with foreign archaeologists. In 1995 the US and Turkmenistan signed a memorandum of understanding for joint excavations at the Anau site over a five-year period. This co-operation was very successful and a new memorandum was signed to enable the project to continue between 2002 and 2006.The directors of the project were Fredrik T. Hiebert of Pennsylvania University and Kakamurad Kurbansakhatov of the Turkmenistan Cultural Heritage Centre.11 The Anau seal was unearthed during excavations in 2000.12 At first, the discovery did not attract particular attention. At the time, the excavations were focussed on the structural remains in the southern part of the site, which seemed to correspond with Phases IV and V of the Namazga-depe culture, with dates between 2500-1600 BCE. The jet seal was recovered by screening from the remains of a room built of clay bricks and with a stone paved doorway. Associated finds include small stone tools, pottery and fragments of human figurines. It is worth stressing that the archaeologists established that this room had had been altered many times and that it had served various functions. It probably started out as a storehouse, and was later used as a workshop. The floor, walls and steps all have marks showing different periods of use. Furthermore, there was an open-air stove in the courtyard on the southern side of the house, in which a large number of round pieces of clay were found (perhaps once used to seal urns?). Carbon dating on
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿瑙封印及其引发的问题
2000年6月,一支美国-土库曼考古队在土库曼南部的阿瑙遗址挖掘时发现了一个由喷气式飞机或褐煤制成的印章,上面有一个显然未知的文字这一发现引起了西方媒体的极大兴趣,并于2001年4月和5月发表了关于这一“亚洲失落文明的第一个字”的专题报道。这一印章立即引起了中国学术界的注意,《中国文物报》上也迅速出现了一些文章中国学者认为这是一项重要的发现,在研究中国印章和文字的起源时不容忽视。此外,它还可能对中国与中亚早期的文化交流提供新的认识。然而,关于这一发现的背景、日期和可能的解释,还有许多未解决的问题。在本文中,我们将重新审视其中的一些问题。为了进一步探讨这个问题,我们将更广泛地关注中亚和中国的考古学,特别是中国印章的发展和中国中亚(新疆)的类似例子。阿瑙遗址位于土库曼斯坦和伊朗边界上科佩特山脉北部的高原上。它位于中亚、西亚和印度古代文明的交汇处,战略位置优越。这个遗址最初是由A.V.科马罗夫将军于1880年发现的,第一批发掘工作始于20世纪初,由地质学家Raphael Pumpelly(1873-1959)和考古学家Hubert Schmidt(1864-1933)进行来自苏联的考古学家很快就在这个地区活跃起来,在阿瑙遗址和纳马加-德佩、阿尔廷-德佩和卡拉-德佩的相关遗址工作。这些遗址的发现是铜器时代和青铜时代文明的典型代表,包括人物、纺织品、陶瓷和金属器皿。这些青铜器时代的遗址现在被归类为巴克特里亚-马吉安娜考古建筑群(BMAC),其年代划分目前是根据类型遗址的证据来确定的,比如纳马兹加-迪普阿瑙文化(Anau IA)的早期阶段早于铜石器时代,但在阿瑙发现了少量的铜矿。namazga深度阶段的特征是青铜和石器时代(公元前3700 - 2500年)的结合,而阶段IV-VI则是青铜时代(公元前2500-1000年)。就印章的发展而言,特别值得注意的是,在卡拉德佩发现了兵马俑印章,属于纳马兹加-德普第三阶段(公元前3000-2500年)印章上的图案类似于十字架,在该遗址的陶罐上也发现了类似的图案。在Shahr-i-Sokhta也发现了铜和石头制成的印章,这是一个类似的日期,也是在土库曼斯坦南部。7在这些印章上发现了相同的十字架图案,以及动物符号。例如,在青铜时代的阿尔廷德普遗址,用青铜和其他金属(如银)制成的印章的数量显著增加这些印章上的图案表明它们是沿袭早期印章的。然而,也有一些设计看起来很像原始文字。虽然我们不能绝对肯定,但一些痕迹似乎表明了伊朗高原的青铜文化与印度河流域文明之间的联系这一时期的密封件通常在背面有一个小穿孔的凸台,或者在侧面有一个孔,通过这个孔可以穿线,而背面没有旋钮。在阿富汗也发现了类似的印章。20世纪90年代,随着苏联解体,土库曼斯坦迅速着手与外国考古学家建立联合项目。1995年,美国和土库曼斯坦签署了一份谅解备忘录,在为期五年的时间里共同挖掘阿瑙遗址。这次合作非常成功,并签署了一份新的备忘录,使该项目能够在2002年至2006年期间继续进行。该项目的负责人是宾夕法尼亚大学的Fredrik T. Hiebert和土库曼斯坦文化遗产中心的Kakamurad Kurbansakhatov。11阿瑙印章是在2000年的挖掘过程中出土的。当时,挖掘工作主要集中在该遗址南部的结构遗迹上,这似乎与纳马加-德普文化的第四和第五阶段相对应,时间在公元前2500-1600年之间。喷气式印章是在一个用粘土砖建造的房间的废墟中通过筛选找到的,房间的门是用石头铺成的。相关的发现包括小型石器、陶器和人类雕像的碎片。值得强调的是,考古学家确定这个房间已经被改造过很多次,它有各种各样的功能。它最初可能是一个仓库,后来被用作车间。 地板、墙壁和台阶上都有不同使用时期的痕迹。此外,在房子南侧的院子里有一个露天炉,里面发现了大量的圆形粘土块(可能曾经用来封瓮?)碳定年法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Hunnish Kushan-shah Central Asian Manuscripts ‘Are Not Worth Much To Us’: The Thousand-Buddha Caves in Early Twentieth-Century China A St. Petersburg Bilingual Document and Problems of the Chronology of Khotan The Ribāṭ-Caravanserais from the Eastern Suburbs of Paykand. Archaeological and Historical Aspects The Coinage of Nakhshab during the First-Fourth Centuries ce. Towards a New Systematization of Sogdian Coinages and the Political History of Sogd during Antiquity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1