Letting Students Choose

Andrew P. Mills
{"title":"Letting Students Choose","authors":"Andrew P. Mills","doi":"10.5840/aaptstudies2019121043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, students have no choice over which assignments they must submit to receive the grade they desire in a course. An alternative “menu approach” (developed by Maryellen Weimer in 2002) provides students with a list of possible assignments and lets them select which to submit. This approach is demonstrated to increase student engagement with course material, motivate students to engage in creative work, and allow students to choose assignments that allow them to best demonstrate their learning. Student reaction is mixed: some like the choice but others are stressed and overwhelmed by it. This may result from the increased responsibility they must shoulder under the Menu Approach. Some questions remain about the link between increased engagement and student learning, questions that may form the basis for future research on the Menu Approach.","PeriodicalId":272536,"journal":{"name":"American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/aaptstudies2019121043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, students have no choice over which assignments they must submit to receive the grade they desire in a course. An alternative “menu approach” (developed by Maryellen Weimer in 2002) provides students with a list of possible assignments and lets them select which to submit. This approach is demonstrated to increase student engagement with course material, motivate students to engage in creative work, and allow students to choose assignments that allow them to best demonstrate their learning. Student reaction is mixed: some like the choice but others are stressed and overwhelmed by it. This may result from the increased responsibility they must shoulder under the Menu Approach. Some questions remain about the link between increased engagement and student learning, questions that may form the basis for future research on the Menu Approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让学生自己选择
传统上,学生不能选择他们必须提交哪些作业来获得他们想要的分数。另一种“菜单法”(Maryellen Weimer于2002年提出)为学生提供了一份可能的作业清单,让他们选择提交哪些作业。这种方法被证明可以提高学生对课程材料的参与度,激励学生从事创造性的工作,并允许学生选择能够最好地展示他们学习的作业。学生们的反应各不相同:一些人喜欢这个选择,但另一些人则感到压力和不知所措。这可能是因为他们在菜单方法下必须承担更多的责任。关于提高参与度和学生学习之间的联系仍然存在一些问题,这些问题可能成为未来菜单方法研究的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing Engineering Students’ Moral Reasoning Skills Using Problem-Based Learning Cross-Year Peer Mentorship in Introductory Philosophy Classes Scaffolding for Fine Philosophical Skills Rancière and Pedagogy Beyond Information Recall
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1