Performance of a target identification algorithm as a function of the discriminant post-processing techniques utilized

M. Cohen, V. Sylvester
{"title":"Performance of a target identification algorithm as a function of the discriminant post-processing techniques utilized","authors":"M. Cohen, V. Sylvester","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.1998.710120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A target identification algorithm can be thought of as being comprised of a pre-processor, discriminant generator, and a post-processor. The pre-processor forms and otherwise conditions the target signatures. The discriminant generator forms scalar quantities that represent the closeness-of-fit of each signature to the target classes of interest. Finally, the post-processor utilizes those scalars to form a decision as to the target that the signature came from; i.e., the identity of the target being examined. In this paper, we start with a full set of discriminants generated by a particular pre-processor and discriminant generator operating on high-range-resolution (HRR) signatures of aircraft, and we perform various experiments to determine the effect on algorithm performance of applying various post-processing techniques. The overall target identification algorithm is described, numerous post-processing techniques are introduced, and their effects on performance are tabulated. It is shown that optimal combined performance of these techniques does not necessarily follow from combining the individual best-performing techniques. That is, an optimal post-processing architecture cannot be derived from a simple search of the diagonal of the multi-dimensional set of post-processing options.","PeriodicalId":202280,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 1998. Celebrating 50 Years (Cat. No.98CH36185)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. NAECON 1998. Celebrating 50 Years (Cat. No.98CH36185)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1998.710120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A target identification algorithm can be thought of as being comprised of a pre-processor, discriminant generator, and a post-processor. The pre-processor forms and otherwise conditions the target signatures. The discriminant generator forms scalar quantities that represent the closeness-of-fit of each signature to the target classes of interest. Finally, the post-processor utilizes those scalars to form a decision as to the target that the signature came from; i.e., the identity of the target being examined. In this paper, we start with a full set of discriminants generated by a particular pre-processor and discriminant generator operating on high-range-resolution (HRR) signatures of aircraft, and we perform various experiments to determine the effect on algorithm performance of applying various post-processing techniques. The overall target identification algorithm is described, numerous post-processing techniques are introduced, and their effects on performance are tabulated. It is shown that optimal combined performance of these techniques does not necessarily follow from combining the individual best-performing techniques. That is, an optimal post-processing architecture cannot be derived from a simple search of the diagonal of the multi-dimensional set of post-processing options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目标识别算法的性能与所使用的判别后处理技术有关
目标识别算法可以被认为是由预处理器、判别生成器和后处理器组成的。预处理器形成目标签名并以其他方式对其进行限制。鉴别生成器形成标量,表示每个签名与感兴趣的目标类的拟合密切度。最后,后处理器利用这些标量对签名来自的目标进行判断;即,被检查的目标的身份。在本文中,我们从一个特定的预处理器和判别生成器生成的一整套判别符开始,这些判别符运行在飞机的高距离分辨率(HRR)签名上,我们进行了各种实验,以确定应用各种后处理技术对算法性能的影响。描述了总体目标识别算法,介绍了许多后处理技术,并列出了它们对性能的影响。结果表明,这些技术的最佳组合性能并不一定来自于单个最佳表现技术的组合。也就是说,最优的后处理架构不能通过简单地搜索多维后处理选项集的对角线来得到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating Chip Carrier Packaging Technology Into Avionic Systems Aircraft Avionics Cooling, Present And Future Aerospace Computers In The 1980s Failure Detection Without Excessive Hardware Redundancy Interface Design Considerations for F-16 Sensors and Weapons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1