Comparative Analysis of Legal Protection and Criteria of Well-Known Marks (Indonesia, United States, India, China, and Germany)

I. Y. Winatha, Ananta Prathama, Putu Chandra Kinandana Kayuan
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Legal Protection and Criteria of Well-Known Marks (Indonesia, United States, India, China, and Germany)","authors":"I. Y. Winatha, Ananta Prathama, Putu Chandra Kinandana Kayuan","doi":"10.22219/aclj.v4i1.23768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trademark functions as a distinguishing mark between goods and/or services of its kind, as well as an identification mark for goods and/or services from the producer concerned. In order to be a well-known and widely recognized mark by the world community, and also to gain a good reputation it requires a very high investment to maintain quality and perform massive promotions in many countries. Considering this, lawful protection of well-known marks is a must. This research uses a normative juridical method by examining regulations and analyzing the previous studies, as well as other relevant legal materials to determine the criteria of well-known marks and the law protection provided for well-known marks in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of the criteria for well-known marks in Indonesia still does not set concretely the minimum number that must be met for each criterion. Furthermore, in principle, Indonesia provides legal protection for well-known marks, both registered and unregistered in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":250069,"journal":{"name":"Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ)","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.23768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trademark functions as a distinguishing mark between goods and/or services of its kind, as well as an identification mark for goods and/or services from the producer concerned. In order to be a well-known and widely recognized mark by the world community, and also to gain a good reputation it requires a very high investment to maintain quality and perform massive promotions in many countries. Considering this, lawful protection of well-known marks is a must. This research uses a normative juridical method by examining regulations and analyzing the previous studies, as well as other relevant legal materials to determine the criteria of well-known marks and the law protection provided for well-known marks in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of the criteria for well-known marks in Indonesia still does not set concretely the minimum number that must be met for each criterion. Furthermore, in principle, Indonesia provides legal protection for well-known marks, both registered and unregistered in Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驰名商标法律保护与标准比较分析(印尼、美国、印度、中国、德国)
商标是同类商品和/或服务之间的区别标志,也是生产者提供的商品和/或服务的识别标志。为了成为国际社会知名和广泛认可的标志,也为了获得良好的声誉,它需要非常高的投资来保持质量并在许多国家进行大规模的推广。考虑到这一点,对驰名商标的合法保护是必须的。本研究采用规范的司法方法,通过考察法规和分析前人的研究,以及其他相关法律材料,确定印度尼西亚驰名商标的标准和驰名商标的法律保护。本研究的结果表明,印度尼西亚驰名商标标准的规定仍然没有具体规定每项标准必须满足的最低数量。此外,印度尼西亚原则上为驰名商标提供法律保护,无论是在印度尼西亚注册的还是未注册的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Review of Medical Crime: Patient Protection and Professional Responsibility in Medical Practice Mitigating The Spread of Radical Ideas Through Counter-Radicalization Based on Local Wisdom Implementation of Business Competition Compliance Program to Prevent Unfair Business Competition Practices Against Business Enterprises Quo Vadis Technology-Based Companies to Issue MVS When Conducting an IPO on the IDX The Ratification of Indonesia-Australia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement: Investment Challenges and Opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1