An Assessment of Women Participation in Community-Based Natural Resource Conservation in Southeast Zimbabwe

C. Mashapa, P. Zisadza-Gandiwa, Elias Libombo, P. Mhuriro-Mashapa, N. Muboko, E. Gandiwa
{"title":"An Assessment of Women Participation in Community-Based Natural Resource Conservation in Southeast Zimbabwe","authors":"C. Mashapa, P. Zisadza-Gandiwa, Elias Libombo, P. Mhuriro-Mashapa, N. Muboko, E. Gandiwa","doi":"10.4236/oje.2020.104013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study assessed women’s participation in the Communal Area Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) activities in southeast Zimbabwe. The study collected data using an interview questionnaire administered to five CAMPFIRE committees in October 2014. There were relatively no differences in the selected attributes on CAMPFIRE committee composition across the five study communities i.e., 1) the number of people and their level of education, and 2) gender and age composition. There were more men (5 ± 0.11) than women (2 ± 0.02) in CAMPFIRE program committees across the five study communities. Men dominate leadership and decision making over CAMPFIRE in south-eastern Zimbabwe. Yet, it is the women who use most of the natural resources at household level, such as game meat, wild fruits and wild vegetables as relish, fuel wood as source of energy for cooking, and baskets woven from woodland products. It was concluded that despite all the benefits that a gender sensitive approach could bring to CAMPFIRE, women participation in CAMPFIRE programs in southeast Zimbabwe was still low as evidenced by their numbers in committees that make decisions for the program. There was need for deliberate action to ensure increased women participation in CAMPFIRE programs, especially at the decision-making level. A certain number of committee positions in CAMPFIRE should be reserved for women.","PeriodicalId":265480,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Ecology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2020.104013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The study assessed women’s participation in the Communal Area Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) activities in southeast Zimbabwe. The study collected data using an interview questionnaire administered to five CAMPFIRE committees in October 2014. There were relatively no differences in the selected attributes on CAMPFIRE committee composition across the five study communities i.e., 1) the number of people and their level of education, and 2) gender and age composition. There were more men (5 ± 0.11) than women (2 ± 0.02) in CAMPFIRE program committees across the five study communities. Men dominate leadership and decision making over CAMPFIRE in south-eastern Zimbabwe. Yet, it is the women who use most of the natural resources at household level, such as game meat, wild fruits and wild vegetables as relish, fuel wood as source of energy for cooking, and baskets woven from woodland products. It was concluded that despite all the benefits that a gender sensitive approach could bring to CAMPFIRE, women participation in CAMPFIRE programs in southeast Zimbabwe was still low as evidenced by their numbers in committees that make decisions for the program. There was need for deliberate action to ensure increased women participation in CAMPFIRE programs, especially at the decision-making level. A certain number of committee positions in CAMPFIRE should be reserved for women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
津巴布韦东南部妇女参与社区自然资源保护的评估
这项研究评估了妇女参加津巴布韦东南部土著资源公共地区管理方案活动的情况。该研究于2014年10月通过对五个CAMPFIRE委员会的访谈问卷收集数据。在五个研究社区中,CAMPFIRE委员会组成的选择属性相对没有差异,即1)人数及其教育水平,以及2)性别和年龄组成。在五个研究社区的CAMPFIRE项目委员会中,男性(5±0.11)比女性(2±0.02)多。在津巴布韦东南部的CAMPFIRE,男性主导着领导和决策。然而,妇女在家庭层面上使用了大部分自然资源,例如野味、野果和野菜作为调味品、用作烹饪能源的柴火以及用林地产品编织的篮子。结论是,尽管性别敏感的方法可以为CAMPFIRE带来所有好处,但津巴布韦东南部CAMPFIRE项目的妇女参与率仍然很低,这可以从为该项目决策的委员会中的妇女人数来看。有必要采取深思熟虑的行动,确保妇女更多地参与CAMPFIRE方案,特别是在决策一级。CAMPFIRE中一定数量的委员会职位应该为女性保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
City Communal Aspiration System—City without Chimneys Spatial Zonation and Diversity of Bivalves and Gastropods in Mangrove Forests of Casiguran, Aurora Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.), Waste Streams, Characterisation and Valorisation: An Overview Chihuahuan Desert Soil Biota Dynamic of Mangrove Associated Molluscs in Anthropized Areas of the Cameroon Coastline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1