{"title":"Problem of Social Leadership and Social Conflict in USSR in Works of Scientists of Russian Emigre of 1950s and 1970s","authors":"T. Dimoni","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2020-2-333-352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of understanding by scientists and public figures of the Russian Emigre of social relations in the USSR of the 1950-1970s is considered in the article. The novelty of the work lies in the choice of sources of research - articles and books of figures of Russian Emigre. The author emphasizes that the main part of the ideas of the considered authors is not sufficiently represented in the scientific community. It is noted that the founders of the research of Soviet society were scientists from the Munich Institute for the Study of History and Culture of the USSR, which in 1957 held a major international conference “Modern Soviet Society”. It is concluded that the conference reports on the multiplicity of Soviet society, the presence of serious legal and economic differentiation, the emergence of new progressive classes (engineering and technical intelligentsia) laid the foundation for promoting research on Russian society. According to the author, in the late 1960s, this direction was actively cultivated by Soviet dissidents who emigrated to the West, and close associates who remained in the USSR (A. A. Amalrik, K. Bourzhuademov, S. S. Malevsky-Malevich, V. Belotserkovsky). A review of the historiography of the Russian Emigre allows us to create a platform for reflection on the social forces of Soviet society, the driving motives of their activity and the struggle for a place in the class hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":190169,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyy dialog","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyy dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-2-333-352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The issue of understanding by scientists and public figures of the Russian Emigre of social relations in the USSR of the 1950-1970s is considered in the article. The novelty of the work lies in the choice of sources of research - articles and books of figures of Russian Emigre. The author emphasizes that the main part of the ideas of the considered authors is not sufficiently represented in the scientific community. It is noted that the founders of the research of Soviet society were scientists from the Munich Institute for the Study of History and Culture of the USSR, which in 1957 held a major international conference “Modern Soviet Society”. It is concluded that the conference reports on the multiplicity of Soviet society, the presence of serious legal and economic differentiation, the emergence of new progressive classes (engineering and technical intelligentsia) laid the foundation for promoting research on Russian society. According to the author, in the late 1960s, this direction was actively cultivated by Soviet dissidents who emigrated to the West, and close associates who remained in the USSR (A. A. Amalrik, K. Bourzhuademov, S. S. Malevsky-Malevich, V. Belotserkovsky). A review of the historiography of the Russian Emigre allows us to create a platform for reflection on the social forces of Soviet society, the driving motives of their activity and the struggle for a place in the class hierarchy.
文章探讨了20世纪50年代至70年代俄罗斯流亡国外的科学家和公众人物对苏联社会关系的理解问题。这项工作的新颖之处在于研究来源的选择-俄罗斯移民人物的文章和书籍。作者强调,被考虑的作者的思想的主要部分在科学界没有得到充分的代表。值得注意的是,苏联社会研究的创始人是慕尼黑苏联历史和文化研究所的科学家,该研究所于1957年举行了一次大型国际会议“现代苏联社会”。结论是,会议报告了苏联社会的多样性,存在严重的法律和经济分化,新的进步阶级(工程和技术知识分子)的出现,为促进对俄罗斯社会的研究奠定了基础。据提交人说,在1960年代后期,移居西方的苏联持不同政见者和留在苏联的亲密伙伴(A. A. Amalrik、K. bourzhhuademov、S. S. Malevsky-Malevich、V. Belotserkovsky)积极地培养了这一方向。回顾俄罗斯流亡者的史学,可以让我们创造一个平台,来反思苏联社会的社会力量,他们活动的驱动动机,以及在阶级等级中争取一席之地的斗争。