Despite Best Intentions: A Critical Analysis of Social Justice Leadership and Decision Making.

David E. DeMatthews, A. Mungal, P. Carrola
{"title":"Despite Best Intentions: A Critical Analysis of Social Justice Leadership and Decision Making.","authors":"David E. DeMatthews, A. Mungal, P. Carrola","doi":"10.5929/2015.5.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between social justice leadership and organizational decision making in order to make recommendations for how principals can make more socially just decisions in difficult school contexts. This article begins with a discussion of social justice leadership, facets and theories associated with social justice, and how facets can be contradictory and problematic in practice. Then, rational choice theory is presented to detail key assumptions and criticisms that are associated with decision-making in complex organizations. Next, rational choice theory is utilized as a straw man for analyzing principal decision-making in complex organizations in order to highlight how competing facets of social justice or inherent leadership dilemmas can arise and complicate decision-making. This article concludes with practice oriented recommendations for principals and other leaders seeking to create more socially just schools. \n\nKeywords: social justice leadership, decision-making, principals, urban education","PeriodicalId":189332,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Issues Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Issues Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5929/2015.5.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between social justice leadership and organizational decision making in order to make recommendations for how principals can make more socially just decisions in difficult school contexts. This article begins with a discussion of social justice leadership, facets and theories associated with social justice, and how facets can be contradictory and problematic in practice. Then, rational choice theory is presented to detail key assumptions and criticisms that are associated with decision-making in complex organizations. Next, rational choice theory is utilized as a straw man for analyzing principal decision-making in complex organizations in order to highlight how competing facets of social justice or inherent leadership dilemmas can arise and complicate decision-making. This article concludes with practice oriented recommendations for principals and other leaders seeking to create more socially just schools. Keywords: social justice leadership, decision-making, principals, urban education
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尽管有最好的意图:对社会正义、领导和决策的批判性分析。
本文的目的是探讨社会公正领导与组织决策之间的关系,以便为校长如何在困难的学校环境中做出更社会公正的决策提供建议。本文首先讨论社会正义领导力,与社会正义相关的方面和理论,以及在实践中如何存在矛盾和问题。然后,理性选择理论提出了详细的关键假设和批评,在复杂的组织决策相关。接下来,理性选择理论被用作分析复杂组织中主要决策的稻草人,以突出社会正义或固有领导困境的竞争方面如何出现并使决策复杂化。本文最后为校长和其他寻求建立更多社会公正学校的领导人提出了以实践为导向的建议。关键词:社会正义领导、决策、校长、城市教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When Culture and Change Collide In Higher Education: A Case Study at One University Authentic Engagement through Workplace Pedagogy MASTERING CRITICAL THINKING COMPETENCIES IN ONLINE GRADUATE CLASSES Gender Difference in STEM Career Aspiration and Social-Cognitive Factors in Collectivist and Individualist Cultures PROTECT STUDENTS’ EDUCATIONAL FUTURES THROUGH SOCIAL CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES IN SPORT AND NON - SPORT EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1