Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis for Adjusting Multiple-bias in the Longitudinal Cardiovascular Study

A. Takeuchi, Y. Matsuyama, Y. Ohashi, H. Ueshima
{"title":"Monte Carlo Sensitivity Analysis for Adjusting Multiple-bias in the Longitudinal Cardiovascular Study","authors":"A. Takeuchi, Y. Matsuyama, Y. Ohashi, H. Ueshima","doi":"10.5691/JJB.31.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epidemiologic findings by conventional statistical methods reflect uncertainty due to random error but omit uncertainty due to biases, such as unmeasured confounding, selection bias, and misclassification error. One approach for addressing this problem is to perform sensitivity analyses. We used MCSA (Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis) to analyze data from a large population-based cohort study, Japan Arteriosclerosis Longitudinal Study-Existing Cohorts Combine. The effects of the blood pressure on arteriosclerotic disease were examined among 21,949 subjects accounting for both misclassification of exposure and unmeasured confounding. We used a Poisson regression model to estimate the gender-specific incidence rate ratio (IRR) of each blood pressure category adjusted for several measured risk factors. The prior information on the misclassified blood pressure and the unmeasured diabetes mellitus history was obtained from sub-cohort members. Sequential correction of two biases by the MCSA led to large decrease of IRR among pre-hypertensive men (IRR = 1.79 [95% limits = 0.22−3.78]) and women (1.15 [0.28−2.25]), and large increase of IRR among stage 2 hypertensive men (7.24 [3.50−11.2]) and women (4.12 [2.14−6.89]). Our expanded MCSA provides valuable approach for bias analysis, which makes explicit and quantifies sources of uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":365545,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.31.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidemiologic findings by conventional statistical methods reflect uncertainty due to random error but omit uncertainty due to biases, such as unmeasured confounding, selection bias, and misclassification error. One approach for addressing this problem is to perform sensitivity analyses. We used MCSA (Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis) to analyze data from a large population-based cohort study, Japan Arteriosclerosis Longitudinal Study-Existing Cohorts Combine. The effects of the blood pressure on arteriosclerotic disease were examined among 21,949 subjects accounting for both misclassification of exposure and unmeasured confounding. We used a Poisson regression model to estimate the gender-specific incidence rate ratio (IRR) of each blood pressure category adjusted for several measured risk factors. The prior information on the misclassified blood pressure and the unmeasured diabetes mellitus history was obtained from sub-cohort members. Sequential correction of two biases by the MCSA led to large decrease of IRR among pre-hypertensive men (IRR = 1.79 [95% limits = 0.22−3.78]) and women (1.15 [0.28−2.25]), and large increase of IRR among stage 2 hypertensive men (7.24 [3.50−11.2]) and women (4.12 [2.14−6.89]). Our expanded MCSA provides valuable approach for bias analysis, which makes explicit and quantifies sources of uncertainty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵向心血管研究中校正多重偏倚的蒙特卡罗灵敏度分析
传统统计方法的流行病学发现反映了随机误差造成的不确定性,但忽略了偏差造成的不确定性,如未测量的混杂、选择偏差和误分类误差。解决这个问题的一种方法是执行敏感性分析。我们使用蒙特卡罗敏感性分析(MCSA)来分析一项大型人群队列研究——日本动脉硬化纵向研究-现有队列联合研究的数据。血压对动脉硬化疾病的影响在21,949名受试者中进行了检查,包括暴露的错误分类和未测量的混淆。我们使用泊松回归模型来估计每个血压类别的性别发病率比(IRR),调整了几个测量的危险因素。从亚队列成员中获得了错误分类的血压和未测量的糖尿病史的先验信息。MCSA对两种偏倚进行序列校正后,高血压前期男性(IRR = 1.79[95%限= 0.22−3.78])和女性(IRR = 1.15[0.28−2.25])的IRR大幅下降,2期高血压男性(IRR = 7.24[3.50−11.2])和女性(IRR = 4.12[2.14−6.89])的IRR大幅上升。我们扩展的MCSA为偏差分析提供了有价值的方法,它明确并量化了不确定性的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meta-Analysis for Time-to-event Outcome Based on Restored Individual Participant Data and Summary Statistics Theoretical Examination and Simulation Study on Analyses for Progression Free Survival as Interval-censored Data がん臨床試験と競合リスク・マルチステートモデル Robust and Interpretable Hazard-based Summary Measures of the Magnitude of the Treatment Effect and Their Inference Procedures Bayesian Ridge Estimators Based on Copula-based Joint Prior Distributions: Cox Regression Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1