Plato in Therapy: A Cognitivist Reassessment of the Republic's Idea of Mimesis

IF 1 2区 艺术学 0 ART JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM Pub Date : 2020-05-18 DOI:10.1111/jaac.12716
JONAS GRETHLEIN
{"title":"Plato in Therapy: A Cognitivist Reassessment of the Republic's Idea of Mimesis","authors":"JONAS GRETHLEIN","doi":"10.1111/jaac.12716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <i>Republic</i>’s ban on poetry is a major reason for the prominent place that liberal critics assign to Plato among the enemies of the open society, Friedrich Nietzsche's description of Plato as “the greatest enemy of art Europe has yet produced” being often cited. In this article, I argue that, while Plato's ethical stance remains unacceptable for most readers today, his understanding of aesthetic experience in the <i>Republic</i> appears highly perceptive when seen in the light of cognitive studies and can be thought-provoking for current debates. As I try to show in the first half of the article, Plato's assessment of responses to poetry and theater resonate with embodied and enactive views of cognition. To corroborate this thesis, I point out in the second half that while theory has been blind to the significance of Plato's aesthetics, its major ideas are substantiated in practice. Contemporary psychotherapy and its increasing deployment of virtual reality unknowingly and with the opposite intent realize Plato's approach to the cognitive dynamics and ethical potential of aesthetic experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":51571,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jaac.12716","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS AND ART CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jaac.12716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Republic’s ban on poetry is a major reason for the prominent place that liberal critics assign to Plato among the enemies of the open society, Friedrich Nietzsche's description of Plato as “the greatest enemy of art Europe has yet produced” being often cited. In this article, I argue that, while Plato's ethical stance remains unacceptable for most readers today, his understanding of aesthetic experience in the Republic appears highly perceptive when seen in the light of cognitive studies and can be thought-provoking for current debates. As I try to show in the first half of the article, Plato's assessment of responses to poetry and theater resonate with embodied and enactive views of cognition. To corroborate this thesis, I point out in the second half that while theory has been blind to the significance of Plato's aesthetics, its major ideas are substantiated in practice. Contemporary psychotherapy and its increasing deployment of virtual reality unknowingly and with the opposite intent realize Plato's approach to the cognitive dynamics and ethical potential of aesthetic experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柏拉图在治疗中:对理想国拟态思想的认知主义再评价
《理想国》对诗歌的禁止是自由主义批评家将柏拉图列为开放社会敌人的主要原因,弗里德里希·尼采(Friedrich Nietzsche)对柏拉图的描述是“欧洲迄今为止艺术的最大敌人”,这一点经常被引用。在这篇文章中,我认为,虽然柏拉图的伦理立场对今天的大多数读者来说仍然是不可接受的,但从认知研究的角度来看,他对《理想国》中审美经验的理解似乎非常敏锐,可以引发当前的辩论。正如我在文章的前半部分试图展示的那样,柏拉图对诗歌和戏剧的反应的评估与认知的具体化和行动观点产生了共鸣。为了证实这一论点,我在后半部分指出,虽然理论对柏拉图美学的意义视而不见,但其主要思想在实践中得到了证实。当代心理治疗及其越来越多的虚拟现实的部署在不知不觉中以相反的意图实现了柏拉图对审美经验的认知动态和伦理潜力的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism publishes current research articles, symposia, special issues, and timely book reviews in aesthetics and the arts. The term aesthetics, in this connection, is understood to include all studies of the arts and related types of experience from a philosophic, scientific, or other theoretical standpoint. The arts are taken to include not only the traditional forms such as music, literature, landscape architecture, dance, painting, architecture, sculpture, and other visual arts, but also more recent additions such as photography, film, earthworks, performance and conceptual art, the crafts and decorative arts, contemporary digital innovations, and other cultural practices, including work and activities in the field of popular culture.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Comic in the Midst of Tragedy's Grief with Tig Notaro, Hannah Gadsby, and Others Winning Over the Audience: Trust and Humor in Stand-Up Comedy What Could It Mean to Say That Today's Stand-Up Audiences Are Too Sensitive? Comic Impossibilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1