Assessing the reporting of stakeholder reciprocity in the Australian banking industry

Suresh Cuganesan, H. Khan
{"title":"Assessing the reporting of stakeholder reciprocity in the Australian banking industry","authors":"Suresh Cuganesan, H. Khan","doi":"10.1108/14013380810889538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – Companies are increasing the amount of their voluntary disclosures to inform stakeholders about organisational performance. Despite criticism that these are simply “public relations” exercises, there has been little formal evaluation of stakeholder reporting, especially in Australia. In addition, the important aspect of stakeholder reciprocity, where not only stakeholder satisfaction but also their contribution to the organisation is evaluated and reported, has not been examined. This study aims to examine both of these issues.Design/methodology/approach – The study was conducted using the non‐financial performance indicators of Australia's top five banks, as available in both annual reports and web sites, to examine the nature of stakeholder reporting and the extent to which stakeholder reciprocity is disclosed.Findings – The results of the study indicate that there is neither consistency in the reporting of key performance indicators, nor is there consistency in reporting across both stakehold...","PeriodicalId":119134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14013380810889538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose – Companies are increasing the amount of their voluntary disclosures to inform stakeholders about organisational performance. Despite criticism that these are simply “public relations” exercises, there has been little formal evaluation of stakeholder reporting, especially in Australia. In addition, the important aspect of stakeholder reciprocity, where not only stakeholder satisfaction but also their contribution to the organisation is evaluated and reported, has not been examined. This study aims to examine both of these issues.Design/methodology/approach – The study was conducted using the non‐financial performance indicators of Australia's top five banks, as available in both annual reports and web sites, to examine the nature of stakeholder reporting and the extent to which stakeholder reciprocity is disclosed.Findings – The results of the study indicate that there is neither consistency in the reporting of key performance indicators, nor is there consistency in reporting across both stakehold...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估澳大利亚银行业的利益相关者互惠报告
目的-公司正在增加其自愿披露的数量,以告知利益相关者有关组织绩效。尽管有人批评这些只是“公关”活动,但对利益相关者报告的正式评估很少,尤其是在澳大利亚。此外,利益相关者互惠的重要方面,不仅是利益相关者满意度,而且他们对组织的贡献也被评估和报告,还没有得到检验。本研究旨在研究这两个问题。设计/方法/方法-本研究采用澳大利亚五大银行的非财务绩效指标(年报和网站上均有)进行,以检查利益相关者报告的性质以及利益相关者互惠的披露程度。研究结果-研究结果表明,关键绩效指标的报告既不一致,在利益相关者之间的报告也不一致……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of human resources in business model performance: The case of network-based companies A value case methodology to enable a transition towards generative health management: A case study from The Netherlands The analysis of intellectual capital evolution: a perspective on research Management control of work‐life balance. A narrative study of an Australian financial institution Bullying in context: a risk management perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1