Clinical methods of dynamic and quantitative evaluation of the shoulder and scapula complex: a scoping review

L. M. Beraldo, Marcelle Guimarães Silva, C. Candotti
{"title":"Clinical methods of dynamic and quantitative evaluation of the shoulder and scapula complex: a scoping review","authors":"L. M. Beraldo, Marcelle Guimarães Silva, C. Candotti","doi":"10.1590/1809-2950/22006029032022en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The shoulder joint has the greatest range of motion and is the most susceptible to dysfunction. Dynamic and quantitative evaluations of this region provide better information for the clinic but the choice of the method depends on its measurement properties. This study aimed to identify the existing methods of quantitative dynamic evaluation of the shoulder and scapula complex, in a clinical context for the general population, identifying the measurement properties and outcomes of each method. The scoping review included in vivo studies, with samples without a specific clinical condition and involving applicable methods in a clinical context. We identified evaluated outcome, measurement method, and its measurement properties. We selected 29 studies that investigated 12 measurement methods, and evaluated their validity and reliability for 17 different outcomes. Most studies (n=21) addressed the position of the shoulder and the scapula and the derivative outcomes, using mainly the units of inertial measurement (n=5) and inertial magnetic measurement (n=6) as evaluation methods. The outcomes with valid and reliable methods were: shoulder joint range; scapula and shoulder motion range; muscle activity; shoulder joint center; humerus length; torque-time curve; functional performance; scapular dyskinesia; external shoulder rotators force; shoulder joint functionality and range; initial scapular movement; scapula and shoulder position; and shoulder angular velocity.","PeriodicalId":436434,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia e Pesquisa","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/22006029032022en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The shoulder joint has the greatest range of motion and is the most susceptible to dysfunction. Dynamic and quantitative evaluations of this region provide better information for the clinic but the choice of the method depends on its measurement properties. This study aimed to identify the existing methods of quantitative dynamic evaluation of the shoulder and scapula complex, in a clinical context for the general population, identifying the measurement properties and outcomes of each method. The scoping review included in vivo studies, with samples without a specific clinical condition and involving applicable methods in a clinical context. We identified evaluated outcome, measurement method, and its measurement properties. We selected 29 studies that investigated 12 measurement methods, and evaluated their validity and reliability for 17 different outcomes. Most studies (n=21) addressed the position of the shoulder and the scapula and the derivative outcomes, using mainly the units of inertial measurement (n=5) and inertial magnetic measurement (n=6) as evaluation methods. The outcomes with valid and reliable methods were: shoulder joint range; scapula and shoulder motion range; muscle activity; shoulder joint center; humerus length; torque-time curve; functional performance; scapular dyskinesia; external shoulder rotators force; shoulder joint functionality and range; initial scapular movement; scapula and shoulder position; and shoulder angular velocity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态和定量评估肩胛骨复合体的临床方法:范围审查
肩关节的活动范围最大,也是最容易发生功能障碍的部位。该区域的动态和定量评价为临床提供了更好的信息,但方法的选择取决于其测量特性。本研究旨在确定现有的肩部和肩胛骨复合体的定量动态评估方法,在一般人群的临床背景下,确定每种方法的测量特性和结果。范围审查包括体内研究,样本没有特定的临床条件,涉及临床环境中的适用方法。我们确定了评估结果、测量方法及其测量特性。我们选择了29项研究,调查了12种测量方法,并评估了17种不同结果的效度和信度。大多数研究(n=21)涉及肩部和肩胛骨的位置及其衍生结果,主要使用惯性测量(n=5)和惯性磁测量(n=6)作为评估方法。方法有效可靠的结果为:肩关节范围;肩胛骨和肩部活动范围;肌肉活动;肩关节中心;肱骨长度;torque-time曲线;功能性能;肩胛运动障碍;肩关节外旋力;肩关节的功能和活动范围;初始肩胛骨运动;肩胛骨和肩部位置;和肩角速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acesso de pacientes com AVC à telessaúde: quais são as principais barreiras e como são explicadas pelo modelo teórico UTAUT? Uma revisão sistemática Alberta infant motor scale in Brazilian research: a bibliometric study Alberta infant motor scale em pesquisas brasileiras: estudo bibliométrico Association between isokinetic strength measures and functional performance in community-dwelling older adults Associação entre medidas de força isocinética e desempenho funcional em pessoas idosas da comunidade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1