Violence at Work: An Examination of Aggressive, Violent, and Repeatedly Violent Employees

Celia M Geck, Teresa Grimbos, Maurice Siu, Philip E Klassen, M. Seto
{"title":"Violence at Work: An Examination of Aggressive, Violent, and Repeatedly Violent Employees","authors":"Celia M Geck, Teresa Grimbos, Maurice Siu, Philip E Klassen, M. Seto","doi":"10.1037/tam0000091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data were examined from clinical files of 306 adult male employees referred by their employer for a mental health and risk assessment after a recent workplace altercation (the index incident) involving either an observed aggressive (e.g., verbal outburst or property damage) or violent (e.g., assault or attempted assault) act directed at a fellow employee. Personal and work-related factors were examined across two comparisons to better understand the factors that distinguished aggressive, violent, and repeatedly violent employees. The first comparison distinguished 219 (72%) employees who were aggressive from 87 (28%) who were violent during their index incident. Results showed that violent employees were more likely to be in a common-law or married relationship and more likely to have previous physical workplace incidents, but were less likely to have a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) Axis I diagnosis and a history of threats at the workplace. The second comparison distinguished 61 (67%) employees who were violent once (nonrepeaters) from 30 (33%) employees who were violent more than once (repeaters). Employees who engaged in repeated violence were found more likely to have experienced early physical abuse, have substance use problems and anger problems, and were more likely to have a DSM Axis II diagnosis. They were also more likely to have problematic workplace histories characterized by threats, intoxication, and suspensions and/or terminations.","PeriodicalId":217565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Data were examined from clinical files of 306 adult male employees referred by their employer for a mental health and risk assessment after a recent workplace altercation (the index incident) involving either an observed aggressive (e.g., verbal outburst or property damage) or violent (e.g., assault or attempted assault) act directed at a fellow employee. Personal and work-related factors were examined across two comparisons to better understand the factors that distinguished aggressive, violent, and repeatedly violent employees. The first comparison distinguished 219 (72%) employees who were aggressive from 87 (28%) who were violent during their index incident. Results showed that violent employees were more likely to be in a common-law or married relationship and more likely to have previous physical workplace incidents, but were less likely to have a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) Axis I diagnosis and a history of threats at the workplace. The second comparison distinguished 61 (67%) employees who were violent once (nonrepeaters) from 30 (33%) employees who were violent more than once (repeaters). Employees who engaged in repeated violence were found more likely to have experienced early physical abuse, have substance use problems and anger problems, and were more likely to have a DSM Axis II diagnosis. They were also more likely to have problematic workplace histories characterized by threats, intoxication, and suspensions and/or terminations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作中的暴力:对攻击性、暴力和反复暴力员工的调查
研究人员检查了306名成年男性雇员的临床档案中的数据,这些雇员是在最近发生工作场所口角(指数事件)后由雇主转诊进行心理健康和风险评估的,这些口角涉及观察到的针对同事的攻击性行为(例如,言语爆发或财产损害)或暴力行为(例如,攻击或企图攻击)。为了更好地理解区分攻击性、暴力和反复暴力员工的因素,我们通过两种比较考察了个人因素和与工作相关的因素。在第一次对比中,219名(72%)员工表现出攻击性,87名(28%)员工表现出暴力倾向。结果显示,有暴力倾向的员工更有可能处于普通法关系或已婚关系中,更有可能之前在工作场所发生过身体事件,但有精神疾病诊断和统计手册(DSM)第一轴诊断和工作场所威胁史的可能性较小。第二次比较区分出61名(67%)有一次暴力行为的员工(非重复者)和30名(33%)有不止一次暴力行为的员工(重复者)。反复从事暴力行为的员工更有可能经历过早期的身体虐待,有物质使用问题和愤怒问题,更有可能被诊断为DSM第二轴。他们也更有可能有以威胁、醉酒、停职和/或解雇为特征的问题工作经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk and threat assessment instruments for violent extremism: A systematic review. Supplemental Material for Risk and Threat Assessment Instruments for Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review Supplemental Material for Differentiating Between Harmless and Harmful Threats: What Factors Increase Risk of Violence Following Threats? Target dispersion as a preapproach indicator in threat assessment and management. Supplemental Material for Risk Assessment Challenges in a Specialized Clinic for Individuals Referred for Violent Extremism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1