Simulated work tasks: the case of professional users

Tanja Svarre Jonasen, Marianne Lykke
{"title":"Simulated work tasks: the case of professional users","authors":"Tanja Svarre Jonasen, Marianne Lykke","doi":"10.1145/2637002.2637027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates simulated work tasks as a tool for information retrieval (IR) evaluation in a work-based, specialized setting. It has been shown that simulated work tasks must be tailored toward the group of study participant to ensure that the depicted situations are realistic and interesting from the participants' point of view [3]. Specifically, we investigate what characterizes an effective simulated work task in a professional government setting and how to design workable tasks for the evaluation of in-house information systems such as a corporate Intranet. The findings reveal that the test participants adopt the tasks. To understand and apply the simulated work tasks, the participants draw on different types of experience and knowledge: Topical, related, structural, and common knowledge. The study also shows that the knowledge types identified are more important for successful retrieval of information than similarity of the simulated work tasks with the participants' daily work tasks.","PeriodicalId":447867,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2637002.2637027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper investigates simulated work tasks as a tool for information retrieval (IR) evaluation in a work-based, specialized setting. It has been shown that simulated work tasks must be tailored toward the group of study participant to ensure that the depicted situations are realistic and interesting from the participants' point of view [3]. Specifically, we investigate what characterizes an effective simulated work task in a professional government setting and how to design workable tasks for the evaluation of in-house information systems such as a corporate Intranet. The findings reveal that the test participants adopt the tasks. To understand and apply the simulated work tasks, the participants draw on different types of experience and knowledge: Topical, related, structural, and common knowledge. The study also shows that the knowledge types identified are more important for successful retrieval of information than similarity of the simulated work tasks with the participants' daily work tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟工作任务:专业用户的案例
本文研究了模拟工作任务作为信息检索(IR)评估的工具在一个基于工作的,专门的设置。研究表明,模拟工作任务必须针对研究参与者群体量身定制,以确保所描述的情况从参与者的角度来看是现实的和有趣的bbb。具体而言,我们研究了在专业政府环境中有效模拟工作任务的特征,以及如何为内部信息系统(如企业内部网)的评估设计可行的任务。研究结果表明,测试参与者接受了这些任务。为了理解和应用模拟的工作任务,参与者利用不同类型的经验和知识:主题知识、相关知识、结构知识和常识。研究还表明,与模拟工作任务与参与者日常工作任务的相似性相比,识别出的知识类型对信息的成功检索更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing autotelic searching experience for casual-leisure by using the user's context X-REC: cross-category entity recommendation Itinerary recommenders: how do users customize their routes and what can we learn from them? Investigating people: a qualitative analysis of the search behaviours of open-source intelligence analysts YASFIIRE: yet another system for IIR evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1