Behavior of Axially Loaded Drilled Shaft Foundations with Symmetric Voids Outside and Inside the Caging

M. Hajali, C. Abishdid
{"title":"Behavior of Axially Loaded Drilled Shaft Foundations with Symmetric Voids Outside and Inside the Caging","authors":"M. Hajali, C. Abishdid","doi":"10.1179/dfi.2012.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Drilled shaft foundations usually carry very high design loads, and often serve as a single load-carrying unit. These conditions have created a need for a high-level of quality assurance during and after construction process. During the construction process, different types of anomalies such as necking, soft-bottom gap at the base, voids and soil intrusions can occur. Anomalies throughout the length can significantly reduce the axial load capacity of the drilled shaft. This paper studies the effect of voids inside and outside the reinforcement cage on the strength and structural capacity of drilled shafts. The objective of this research is to quantify the extent of loss in axial strength and stiffness of drilled shafts due to presence of three different types of symmetric voids throughout their lengths; also, to evaluate the potential for buckling of longitudinal bars within the various types of voids. To complete these objectives, fifteen large-scale drilled shaft samples were built and tested using a hydraulic actuator at the Florida International University’s (FIU) Titan America Structures and Construction Testing (TASCT) laboratory. During the static load test, load-displacement curves were recorded by the data acquisition system (MegaDAC). Results show that the presence of symmetric voids outside the rebar cage (void Type C) that occupy 40% of the cross sectional area of the drilled shafts cause 27% reduction in the axial capacity, while the symmetric voids that penetrate inside the core (void Type B) cause 47% reduction in the axial capacity. The findings indicate that the voids Type B decrease the capacity and stiffness of drilled shafts more than other types due to the resulting inadequate confinement of the concrete and reinforcement.","PeriodicalId":272645,"journal":{"name":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/dfi.2012.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Drilled shaft foundations usually carry very high design loads, and often serve as a single load-carrying unit. These conditions have created a need for a high-level of quality assurance during and after construction process. During the construction process, different types of anomalies such as necking, soft-bottom gap at the base, voids and soil intrusions can occur. Anomalies throughout the length can significantly reduce the axial load capacity of the drilled shaft. This paper studies the effect of voids inside and outside the reinforcement cage on the strength and structural capacity of drilled shafts. The objective of this research is to quantify the extent of loss in axial strength and stiffness of drilled shafts due to presence of three different types of symmetric voids throughout their lengths; also, to evaluate the potential for buckling of longitudinal bars within the various types of voids. To complete these objectives, fifteen large-scale drilled shaft samples were built and tested using a hydraulic actuator at the Florida International University’s (FIU) Titan America Structures and Construction Testing (TASCT) laboratory. During the static load test, load-displacement curves were recorded by the data acquisition system (MegaDAC). Results show that the presence of symmetric voids outside the rebar cage (void Type C) that occupy 40% of the cross sectional area of the drilled shafts cause 27% reduction in the axial capacity, while the symmetric voids that penetrate inside the core (void Type B) cause 47% reduction in the axial capacity. The findings indicate that the voids Type B decrease the capacity and stiffness of drilled shafts more than other types due to the resulting inadequate confinement of the concrete and reinforcement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
笼内外对称孔洞轴向载荷下钻孔基础的受力特性
摘要钻井基础通常承载很高的设计荷载,通常作为单一承载单元。这些条件使得在施工过程中和施工后需要高水平的质量保证。在施工过程中,会出现缩颈、基底软底缝隙、空洞和土体侵入等不同类型的异常。整个长度的异常会显著降低所钻井筒的轴向载荷能力。本文研究了钢筋笼内外空隙对钻孔竖井强度和结构承载力的影响。本研究的目的是量化由于存在三种不同类型的对称空洞而导致的轴向强度和刚度损失的程度;此外,还评估了在不同类型的孔洞中纵杆的屈曲可能性。为了完成这些目标,在佛罗里达国际大学(FIU)泰坦美国结构与施工测试(TASCT)实验室,建造了15个大型钻井井样品,并使用液压执行器进行了测试。静载试验时,通过数据采集系统(MegaDAC)记录荷载-位移曲线。结果表明:钢筋笼外对称孔洞(C型孔洞)占钻轴截面积的40%,导致轴向承载力降低27%,而穿透岩心内部的对称孔洞(B型孔洞)导致轴向承载力降低47%。研究结果表明,由于B型孔洞对混凝土和钢筋的约束不足,导致钻孔轴的承载力和刚度下降幅度大于其他类型孔洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note – Issue 3 (2018) Measured end resistance of CFA and drilled displacement piles in San Francisco Area alluvial clay DFI Journal Underwriters A sensitivity analysis on the parameters affecting large diameter helical pile installation torque, depth and installation power for offshore applications The deep soil mixing for the Galataport project in Istanbul, Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1