{"title":"Revolutionaries as Political Women","authors":"Manas Misra","doi":"10.5617/jea.9652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of studying women’s participation in radical movements, as the classical study We Were Making History notes, is ‘an attempt to broaden the history of that struggle by recovering the subjective experience of women, to capture women’s voices from the past and to present issues as they were perceived by women’ (Stree Shakti Sanghathana, 1989, 2). Taking this framework as the point of departure, this article seeks to explore the history of women’s participation in the secessionist politics of the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA). Deviating from the existing scholarships on the subject that rightly focus on the lack of adequate women’s representation at the leadership level, this article argues that representation at formal political negotiations is not the only form of political activity that women aspire to. Instead, in their own way, many of these revolutionaries have in fact turned into ‘political women’. Fictional writings in the Assamese language are more forthcoming than academic scholarship in recognizing this alternative, informal politics in which women engage. At the same time, it is important to note that these ‘political women’ need not be free from conventional gendered prejudices.","PeriodicalId":190492,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extreme Anthropology","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extreme Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/jea.9652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of studying women’s participation in radical movements, as the classical study We Were Making History notes, is ‘an attempt to broaden the history of that struggle by recovering the subjective experience of women, to capture women’s voices from the past and to present issues as they were perceived by women’ (Stree Shakti Sanghathana, 1989, 2). Taking this framework as the point of departure, this article seeks to explore the history of women’s participation in the secessionist politics of the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA). Deviating from the existing scholarships on the subject that rightly focus on the lack of adequate women’s representation at the leadership level, this article argues that representation at formal political negotiations is not the only form of political activity that women aspire to. Instead, in their own way, many of these revolutionaries have in fact turned into ‘political women’. Fictional writings in the Assamese language are more forthcoming than academic scholarship in recognizing this alternative, informal politics in which women engage. At the same time, it is important to note that these ‘political women’ need not be free from conventional gendered prejudices.
正如经典研究《我们正在创造历史》(We Were Making History)所指出的那样,研究女性参与激进运动的目的是“试图通过恢复女性的主观经验来扩大这场斗争的历史,从过去捕捉女性的声音,并从女性的角度看待现在的问题”(Stree Shakti Sanghathana, 1989, 2)。以这个框架为出发点,本文旨在探讨妇女参与阿萨姆邦联合解放阵线(ULFA)分离主义政治的历史。与现有的关于这一主题的奖学金正确地关注缺乏足够的妇女在领导层面的代表不同,本文认为,正式政治谈判中的代表并不是妇女渴望的唯一政治活动形式。相反,这些革命者中的许多人实际上以自己的方式变成了“政治女性”。用阿萨姆语写的小说比学术研究更能认识到这种女性参与的非正式政治。与此同时,重要的是要注意到,这些“政治女性”不必摆脱传统的性别偏见。