Management of Refractory Lupus Nephritis

A. Fanouriakis, G. Bertsias
{"title":"Management of Refractory Lupus Nephritis","authors":"A. Fanouriakis, G. Bertsias","doi":"10.33590/emjnephrol/10310806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the significant advances in the field, up to one-third of lupus nephritis (LN) patients still do not respond adequately to initial immunosuppressive treatment. This group of patients is heterogeneous in terms of clinical presentation (deterioration of glomerular filtration rate, variable degrees of persistent proteinuria, active urine sediment) and the potential for reversion (ongoing kidney inflammation versus irreversible damage due to scarring and fibrosis). A repeat kidney biopsy can be highly informative in this regard and should be strongly considered. High-quality evidence regarding the treatment of refractory LN is lacking, and management is largely based on observational studies and expert opinion. Options include switching between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC), using rituximab as monotherapy or add-on therapy, or combining MMF with a calcineurin inhibitor in cases of persistent proteinuria. Renal response can be maintained with MMF or prolonged pulses of intravenous CYC administered bimonthly or quarterly. The efficacy of novel biological agents and those under development in refractory forms of LN remains to be determined. Tight control of cardiovascular risk factors, use of hydroxychloroquine, immunisations, and osteoporosis prophylaxis are important adjunctive measures. For the future, we anticipate that research efforts for the identification of accurate biomarkers together with accumulating data from observational and controlled studies will assist therapeutic decisions and improve outcomes in patients with refractory LN.","PeriodicalId":348431,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Nephrology","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjnephrol/10310806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite the significant advances in the field, up to one-third of lupus nephritis (LN) patients still do not respond adequately to initial immunosuppressive treatment. This group of patients is heterogeneous in terms of clinical presentation (deterioration of glomerular filtration rate, variable degrees of persistent proteinuria, active urine sediment) and the potential for reversion (ongoing kidney inflammation versus irreversible damage due to scarring and fibrosis). A repeat kidney biopsy can be highly informative in this regard and should be strongly considered. High-quality evidence regarding the treatment of refractory LN is lacking, and management is largely based on observational studies and expert opinion. Options include switching between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC), using rituximab as monotherapy or add-on therapy, or combining MMF with a calcineurin inhibitor in cases of persistent proteinuria. Renal response can be maintained with MMF or prolonged pulses of intravenous CYC administered bimonthly or quarterly. The efficacy of novel biological agents and those under development in refractory forms of LN remains to be determined. Tight control of cardiovascular risk factors, use of hydroxychloroquine, immunisations, and osteoporosis prophylaxis are important adjunctive measures. For the future, we anticipate that research efforts for the identification of accurate biomarkers together with accumulating data from observational and controlled studies will assist therapeutic decisions and improve outcomes in patients with refractory LN.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
难治性狼疮性肾炎的治疗
尽管该领域取得了重大进展,但高达三分之一的狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者对初始免疫抑制治疗仍然没有充分的反应。这组患者在临床表现(肾小球滤过率恶化,不同程度的持续性蛋白尿,活动性尿沉积物)和逆转的可能性(持续的肾脏炎症与由瘢痕和纤维化引起的不可逆损伤)方面具有异质性。在这方面,重复肾活检可提供大量信息,应予以强烈考虑。关于难治性淋巴结的治疗缺乏高质量的证据,治疗主要基于观察性研究和专家意见。选择包括在霉酚酸酯(MMF)和环磷酰胺(CYC)之间切换,使用利妥昔单抗作为单药或附加治疗,或在持续性蛋白尿病例中将MMF与钙调磷酸酶抑制剂联合使用。肾反应可以维持MMF或延长脉冲静脉给予CYC两个月或每季度。新型生物制剂和正在开发的生物制剂对难治性LN的疗效仍有待确定。严格控制心血管危险因素、使用羟氯喹、免疫接种和预防骨质疏松症是重要的辅助措施。对于未来,我们期望通过研究工作来识别准确的生物标志物,并从观察性和对照研究中积累数据,这将有助于治疗决策,并改善难治性LN患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Potassium Intake on the Renoprotective Response to Sodium Restriction and Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Interaction of General Obesity and Abdominal Obesity, and Frailty in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease ERA 2024 Interview: Jeroen de Baaij ERA 2024 Interview: Jasper Callemeyn ERA 2024 Interview: Peter Stenvinkel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1