Trust me, I'm a Root CA! Analyzing SSL Root CAs in Modern Browsers and Operating Systems

T. Fadai, S. Schrittwieser, Peter Kieseberg, M. Mulazzani
{"title":"Trust me, I'm a Root CA! Analyzing SSL Root CAs in Modern Browsers and Operating Systems","authors":"T. Fadai, S. Schrittwieser, Peter Kieseberg, M. Mulazzani","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2015.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The security and privacy of our online communications heavily relies on the entity authentication mechanisms provided by SSL. Those mechanisms in turn heavily depend on the trustworthiness of a large number of companies and governmental institutions for attestation of the identity of SSL services providers. In order to offer a wide and unobstructed availability of SSL-enabled services and to remove the need to make a large amount of trust decisions from their users, operating systems and browser manufactures include lists of certification authorities which are trusted for SSL entity authentication by their products. This has the problematic effect that users of such browsers and operating systems implicitly trust those certification authorities with the privacy of their communications while they might not even realize it. The problem is further complicated by the fact that different software vendors trust different companies and governmental institutions, from a variety of countries, which leads to an obscure distribution of trust. To give insight into the trust model used by SSL this thesis explains the various entities and technical processes involved in establishing trust when using SSL communications. It furthermore analyzes the number and origin of companies and governmental institutions trusted by various operating systems and browser vendors and correlates the gathered information to a variety of indexes to illustrate that some of these trusted entities are far from trustworthy. Furthermore it points out the fact that the number of entities we trust with the security of our SSL communications keeps growing over time and displays the negative effects this might have as well as shows that the trust model of SSL is fundamentally broken.","PeriodicalId":331539,"journal":{"name":"2015 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2015.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The security and privacy of our online communications heavily relies on the entity authentication mechanisms provided by SSL. Those mechanisms in turn heavily depend on the trustworthiness of a large number of companies and governmental institutions for attestation of the identity of SSL services providers. In order to offer a wide and unobstructed availability of SSL-enabled services and to remove the need to make a large amount of trust decisions from their users, operating systems and browser manufactures include lists of certification authorities which are trusted for SSL entity authentication by their products. This has the problematic effect that users of such browsers and operating systems implicitly trust those certification authorities with the privacy of their communications while they might not even realize it. The problem is further complicated by the fact that different software vendors trust different companies and governmental institutions, from a variety of countries, which leads to an obscure distribution of trust. To give insight into the trust model used by SSL this thesis explains the various entities and technical processes involved in establishing trust when using SSL communications. It furthermore analyzes the number and origin of companies and governmental institutions trusted by various operating systems and browser vendors and correlates the gathered information to a variety of indexes to illustrate that some of these trusted entities are far from trustworthy. Furthermore it points out the fact that the number of entities we trust with the security of our SSL communications keeps growing over time and displays the negative effects this might have as well as shows that the trust model of SSL is fundamentally broken.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相信我,我是根CA!现代浏览器和操作系统中的SSL根ca分析
我们在线通信的安全性和隐私性在很大程度上依赖于SSL提供的实体身份验证机制。这些机制反过来在很大程度上依赖于大量公司和政府机构对SSL服务提供者身份的认证的可信度。为了提供支持SSL的服务的广泛和畅通的可用性,并消除对用户进行大量信任决策的需要,操作系统和浏览器制造商包括其产品对SSL实体身份验证受信任的证书颁发机构列表。这就产生了一个问题,即这些浏览器和操作系统的用户隐式地信任这些证书颁发机构,将其通信的隐私保护起来,而他们甚至可能没有意识到这一点。由于不同的软件供应商信任来自不同国家的不同公司和政府机构,这导致了信任的模糊分布,这一事实使问题进一步复杂化。为了深入了解SSL使用的信任模型,本文解释了在使用SSL通信时建立信任所涉及的各种实体和技术过程。它进一步分析了受各种操作系统和浏览器供应商信任的公司和政府机构的数量和来源,并将收集到的信息与各种索引相关联,以说明其中一些受信任的实体远不值得信任。此外,它还指出了一个事实,即我们信任SSL通信安全性的实体数量随着时间的推移而不断增长,并显示了这可能产生的负面影响,同时也表明了SSL的信任模型从根本上被破坏了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role and Security of Firewalls in IaaS Cloud Computing Intensifying State Surveillance of Electronic Communications: A Legal Solution in Addressing Extremism or Not? Countermeasures for Covert Channel-Internal Control Protocols A Performance Evaluation of Hash Functions for IP Reputation Lookup Using Bloom Filters Advanced Attribute-Based Key Management for Mobile Devices in Hybrid Clouds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1