Uncertainty through Sampling: The Correspondence of Monte Carlo Dropout and Spiking in Artificial Neural Networks

K. Standvoss, Lukas Großberger
{"title":"Uncertainty through Sampling: The Correspondence of Monte Carlo Dropout and Spiking in Artificial Neural Networks","authors":"K. Standvoss, Lukas Großberger","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1215-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Any organism that senses its environment only has an incomplete and noisy perspective on the world, which creates a necessity for nervous systems to represent uncertainty. While the principles of encoding uncertainty in biological neural ensembles are still under investigation, deep learning became a popular and effective machine learning method. In these models, sampling through dropout has been proposed as a mechanism to encode uncertainty. Moreover, dropout has previously been linked to variability in spiking networks under specific assumptions. We compare the relationship between dropout and spiking neuron models by means of the variation ratio over their output. We demonstrate that in cases of incomplete world knowledge (epistemic uncertainty) as well as for noisy observations (aleatoric uncertainty) both neuron models show similar uncertainty representations. These findings provide evidence that sampling could play a fundamental role in representing uncertainties in neural systems.","PeriodicalId":281121,"journal":{"name":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1215-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Any organism that senses its environment only has an incomplete and noisy perspective on the world, which creates a necessity for nervous systems to represent uncertainty. While the principles of encoding uncertainty in biological neural ensembles are still under investigation, deep learning became a popular and effective machine learning method. In these models, sampling through dropout has been proposed as a mechanism to encode uncertainty. Moreover, dropout has previously been linked to variability in spiking networks under specific assumptions. We compare the relationship between dropout and spiking neuron models by means of the variation ratio over their output. We demonstrate that in cases of incomplete world knowledge (epistemic uncertainty) as well as for noisy observations (aleatoric uncertainty) both neuron models show similar uncertainty representations. These findings provide evidence that sampling could play a fundamental role in representing uncertainties in neural systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抽样的不确定性:人工神经网络中蒙特卡罗Dropout和尖峰的对应关系
任何能感知环境的有机体对世界的看法都是不完整和嘈杂的,这就需要神经系统来代表不确定性。虽然生物神经系统的不确定性编码原理仍在研究中,但深度学习已成为一种流行而有效的机器学习方法。在这些模型中,通过dropout进行采样已被提出作为一种编码不确定性的机制。此外,在特定的假设下,辍学与尖峰网络的可变性有关。我们通过输出的变化率来比较dropout和spike神经元模型之间的关系。我们证明,在不完全世界知识(认知不确定性)和噪声观测(任意不确定性)的情况下,两个神经元模型都显示出类似的不确定性表示。这些发现提供了证据,证明采样可以在神经系统的不确定性中发挥基本作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives as Networks: Predicting Memory from the Structure of Naturalistic Events Subtractive gating improves generalization in working memory tasks Do LSTMs know about Principle C? Unfolding of multisensory inference in the brain and behavior Adversarial Training of Neural Encoding Models on Population Spike Trains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1