Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis

A. Azim, Armin Ahmed, A. Baronia, R. Marak, N. Muzzafar
{"title":"Intra-Abdominal Candidiasis","authors":"A. Azim, Armin Ahmed, A. Baronia, R. Marak, N. Muzzafar","doi":"10.33590/emjnephrol/10310735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is the second most common form of invasive candidiasis after candidaemia. IAC is a broad term and can be classified on the basis of anatomical site (Candida peritonitis, pancreatic candidiasis, biliary tract candidiasis, gastrointestinal candidiasis, and hepatosplenic candidiasis) as well as clinical setting (community acquired versus nosocomial). The risk factors linked with IAC are candida colonisation, anastomotic leak, multiple instrumentation, long-term broad spectrum antibiotic use, total parenteral nutrition, and immunocompromised state. Clinically, IAC is not different from intraabdominal bacterial infection. Patients generally present with signs and symptoms of intra-abdominal sepsis after not responding to antibiotic therapy and with a background history of multiple surgical interventions or history of delayed source control. Radiological investigations, like ultrasonography and computed tomography scan, not only aid in diagnosis but also assist in differentiating medical from surgical cases. Microbiological diagnosis requires isolation of candida from an intra-abdominal specimen. Differentiation between colonisation and infection is difficult. Generally, progressive and persistent colonisation is associated with high risk of infection. Blood cultures have poor sensitivity for IAC. Non-culture based techniques used for diagnosis are mannan/anti-mannan assay, beta-D glucan assay, and validated polymerase chain reaction. Four types of antifungal strategies described in the literature are prophylaxis (risk factor driven), pre-emptive (colonisation or biomarker driven), empirical (fever driven), and targeted therapy (microbiology driven). Over recent years, global epidemiology has shown a shift from Candida albicans to non-albicans. Local epidemiology plays an important role in selection of the appropriate empirical therapy. The purpose of this review is to discuss different types of IAC based on their classification, risk factors, and management.","PeriodicalId":348431,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Nephrology","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjnephrol/10310735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is the second most common form of invasive candidiasis after candidaemia. IAC is a broad term and can be classified on the basis of anatomical site (Candida peritonitis, pancreatic candidiasis, biliary tract candidiasis, gastrointestinal candidiasis, and hepatosplenic candidiasis) as well as clinical setting (community acquired versus nosocomial). The risk factors linked with IAC are candida colonisation, anastomotic leak, multiple instrumentation, long-term broad spectrum antibiotic use, total parenteral nutrition, and immunocompromised state. Clinically, IAC is not different from intraabdominal bacterial infection. Patients generally present with signs and symptoms of intra-abdominal sepsis after not responding to antibiotic therapy and with a background history of multiple surgical interventions or history of delayed source control. Radiological investigations, like ultrasonography and computed tomography scan, not only aid in diagnosis but also assist in differentiating medical from surgical cases. Microbiological diagnosis requires isolation of candida from an intra-abdominal specimen. Differentiation between colonisation and infection is difficult. Generally, progressive and persistent colonisation is associated with high risk of infection. Blood cultures have poor sensitivity for IAC. Non-culture based techniques used for diagnosis are mannan/anti-mannan assay, beta-D glucan assay, and validated polymerase chain reaction. Four types of antifungal strategies described in the literature are prophylaxis (risk factor driven), pre-emptive (colonisation or biomarker driven), empirical (fever driven), and targeted therapy (microbiology driven). Over recent years, global epidemiology has shown a shift from Candida albicans to non-albicans. Local epidemiology plays an important role in selection of the appropriate empirical therapy. The purpose of this review is to discuss different types of IAC based on their classification, risk factors, and management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹内的念珠菌病
腹腔内念珠菌病(IAC)是继念珠菌血症之后第二常见的侵袭性念珠菌病。IAC是一个广义的术语,可以根据解剖部位(念珠菌腹膜炎、胰腺念珠菌病、胆道念珠菌病、胃肠道念珠菌病和肝脾念珠菌病)以及临床环境(社区获得性与医院获得性)进行分类。与IAC相关的危险因素有念珠菌定植、吻合口漏、多种器械、长期使用广谱抗生素、全肠外营养和免疫功能低下状态。在临床上,IAC与腹腔内细菌感染并无不同。患者对抗生素治疗无反应后,通常出现腹腔内脓毒症的症状和体征,并有多次手术干预的背景史或延迟源控制的历史。放射学检查,如超声检查和计算机断层扫描,不仅有助于诊断,而且有助于区分内科病例和外科病例。微生物学诊断需要从腹内标本中分离念珠菌。很难区分定植和感染。通常,进行性和持续性定植与感染的高风险相关。血液培养对IAC的敏感性较差。用于诊断的非培养技术有甘露聚糖/抗甘露聚糖测定、β - d葡聚糖测定和经验证的聚合酶链反应。文献中描述的四种类型的抗真菌策略是预防(风险因素驱动),先发制人(定植或生物标志物驱动),经验(发烧驱动)和靶向治疗(微生物驱动)。近年来,全球流行病学显示出从白色念珠菌到非白色念珠菌的转变。当地流行病学在选择合适的经验疗法方面起着重要作用。本综述的目的是讨论不同类型的IAC的分类、危险因素和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Potassium Intake on the Renoprotective Response to Sodium Restriction and Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Interaction of General Obesity and Abdominal Obesity, and Frailty in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease ERA 2024 Interview: Jeroen de Baaij ERA 2024 Interview: Jasper Callemeyn ERA 2024 Interview: Peter Stenvinkel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1