'Cambridge Moralica' - Towards an Ethical Framework for Social Media Analytics

Anna-Katharina Jung, Sünje Clausen, A. S. Franzke, Julian Marx
{"title":"'Cambridge Moralica' - Towards an Ethical Framework for Social Media Analytics","authors":"Anna-Katharina Jung, Sünje Clausen, A. S. Franzke, Julian Marx","doi":"10.3127/ajis.v26i0.3121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"En route to the unravelling of today’s multiplicity of societal challenges, making sense of social data has become a crucial endeavour in Information Systems (IS) research. In this context, Social Media Analytics (SMA) has evolved to a promising field of data-driven approaches, guiding researchers in the process of collecting, analysing, and visualising social media data. However, the handling of such sensitive data requires careful ethical considerations to protect data subjects, online communities, and researchers. Hitherto, the field lacks consensus on how to safeguard ethical conduct throughout the research process. To address this shortcoming, this study proposes an extended version of a SMA framework by incorporating ethical reflection phases as an addition to methodical steps. Following a design science approach, existing ethics guidelines and expert interviews with SMA researchers and ethicists serve as the basis for redesigning the framework. It was eventually assessed through multiple rounds of evaluation in the form of focus group discussions and questionnaires with ethics board members and SMA experts. The extended framework, encompassing a total of five iterative ethical reflection phases, provides simplified ethical guidance for SMA researchers and facilitates the ethical self-examination of research projects involving social media data.","PeriodicalId":106236,"journal":{"name":"Australas. J. Inf. Syst.","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australas. J. Inf. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v26i0.3121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

En route to the unravelling of today’s multiplicity of societal challenges, making sense of social data has become a crucial endeavour in Information Systems (IS) research. In this context, Social Media Analytics (SMA) has evolved to a promising field of data-driven approaches, guiding researchers in the process of collecting, analysing, and visualising social media data. However, the handling of such sensitive data requires careful ethical considerations to protect data subjects, online communities, and researchers. Hitherto, the field lacks consensus on how to safeguard ethical conduct throughout the research process. To address this shortcoming, this study proposes an extended version of a SMA framework by incorporating ethical reflection phases as an addition to methodical steps. Following a design science approach, existing ethics guidelines and expert interviews with SMA researchers and ethicists serve as the basis for redesigning the framework. It was eventually assessed through multiple rounds of evaluation in the form of focus group discussions and questionnaires with ethics board members and SMA experts. The extended framework, encompassing a total of five iterative ethical reflection phases, provides simplified ethical guidance for SMA researchers and facilitates the ethical self-examination of research projects involving social media data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“剑桥道德”——迈向社交媒体分析的道德框架
在解开当今社会挑战的多样性的道路上,理解社会数据已经成为信息系统(IS)研究的一个关键努力。在这种背景下,社交媒体分析(SMA)已经发展成为一个有前景的数据驱动方法领域,指导研究人员收集、分析和可视化社交媒体数据的过程。然而,处理此类敏感数据需要仔细考虑道德因素,以保护数据主体、在线社区和研究人员。迄今为止,该领域对如何在整个研究过程中维护伦理行为缺乏共识。为了解决这一缺点,本研究提出了一个扩展版本的SMA框架,通过将伦理反思阶段作为系统步骤的补充。遵循设计科学的方法,现有的伦理准则和对SMA研究人员和伦理学家的专家访谈作为重新设计框架的基础。最终通过焦点小组讨论和与伦理委员会成员和SMA专家进行问卷调查的形式进行多轮评估。该扩展框架共包含五个迭代伦理反思阶段,为SMA研究人员提供了简化的伦理指导,并促进了涉及社交媒体数据的研究项目的伦理自我检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What prevents organisations from achieving e-HRM potential? Mobile Identity Protection: The Moderation Role of Self-Efficacy Using Analytical Information for Digital Business Transformation through DataOps: A Review and Conceptual Framework Doing Big Things in a Small Way: A Social Media Analytics Approach to Information Diffusion During Crisis Events in Digital Influencer Networks A configurational view on technology acceptance: the example of highly integrated collaboration platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1