A Long Way to Go: The Hungarian Science and Technology Policy in Transition

Attila Havas
{"title":"A Long Way to Go: The Hungarian Science and Technology Policy in Transition","authors":"Attila Havas","doi":"10.4324/9780429457272-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central European countries highlight the importance of institutions as they are of somewhat different nature in this diverse group of countries, given their different history. Briefly, before World War II there was a market economy in place in Central Europe – as opposed to most Eastern European countries and former Soviet republics – based on private property. These economies were linked to the wider European economic space via foreign trade, subsidiaries of, and joint ventures with, foreign firms operating there and subsidiaries of Central European firms active abroad. Then they went through the planned economy period and right now the transition process. As three rather distinct socio-economic systems and their impacts on the national system(s) of innovation can be observed in these cases, it is a ‘living’ laboratory where evolving institutions, including re-emerging old ones, can be explored. Thus it seems worthwhile studying these cases in-depth as they might provide a number of important, perhaps eye-opening, lessons for more general theorising. This chapter analyses institutional changes in Hungary from the point of view of science and technology (S&T) policy by pulling together some recent theoretical developments in the economics of innovation and a fairly descriptive approach. The underlying question is whether it is possible to devise a coherent, feasible S&T policy and implement it in an efficient – or at least a satisfactory – way in a transition economy, or whether S&T policy, together with other major institutions, is also evolving. In other words, is S&T policy an outcome of conscious, well-designed and co-ordinated efforts in this period (can it be?), or should it be seen as a resultant of deliberate and unintended consequences of actions and interactions of a host of actors? Theories and models of innovation as theoretical foundations for S&T policy are briefly outlined in section 2. Then section 3 describes the legacy of central planning in Hungary. Recent changes in the science and technology system are analysed in section 4, and policy conclusions are presented in the final section.","PeriodicalId":371769,"journal":{"name":"Institutional Change and Industrial Development in Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutional Change and Industrial Development in Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429457272-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Central European countries highlight the importance of institutions as they are of somewhat different nature in this diverse group of countries, given their different history. Briefly, before World War II there was a market economy in place in Central Europe – as opposed to most Eastern European countries and former Soviet republics – based on private property. These economies were linked to the wider European economic space via foreign trade, subsidiaries of, and joint ventures with, foreign firms operating there and subsidiaries of Central European firms active abroad. Then they went through the planned economy period and right now the transition process. As three rather distinct socio-economic systems and their impacts on the national system(s) of innovation can be observed in these cases, it is a ‘living’ laboratory where evolving institutions, including re-emerging old ones, can be explored. Thus it seems worthwhile studying these cases in-depth as they might provide a number of important, perhaps eye-opening, lessons for more general theorising. This chapter analyses institutional changes in Hungary from the point of view of science and technology (S&T) policy by pulling together some recent theoretical developments in the economics of innovation and a fairly descriptive approach. The underlying question is whether it is possible to devise a coherent, feasible S&T policy and implement it in an efficient – or at least a satisfactory – way in a transition economy, or whether S&T policy, together with other major institutions, is also evolving. In other words, is S&T policy an outcome of conscious, well-designed and co-ordinated efforts in this period (can it be?), or should it be seen as a resultant of deliberate and unintended consequences of actions and interactions of a host of actors? Theories and models of innovation as theoretical foundations for S&T policy are briefly outlined in section 2. Then section 3 describes the legacy of central planning in Hungary. Recent changes in the science and technology system are analysed in section 4, and policy conclusions are presented in the final section.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
任重道远:转型中的匈牙利科技政策
中欧国家强调制度的重要性,因为它们在这个多样化的国家集团中有着不同的性质,考虑到它们不同的历史。简单地说,二战前中欧实行了以私有财产为基础的市场经济,这与大多数东欧国家和前苏联共和国不同。这些经济体通过对外贸易、在那里经营的外国公司的子公司和合资企业以及在国外活跃的中欧公司的子公司,与更广泛的欧洲经济空间联系在一起。然后他们经历了计划经济时期,现在是转型过程。由于在这些案例中可以观察到三种相当不同的社会经济系统及其对国家创新系统的影响,因此它是一个“活的”实验室,可以探索不断发展的制度,包括重新出现的旧制度。因此,深入研究这些案例似乎是值得的,因为它们可能为更一般的理论化提供许多重要的,也许是令人大开眼界的经验教训。本章从科学技术(S&T)政策的角度分析匈牙利的制度变迁,将创新经济学的一些最新理论发展和一种相当描述性的方法结合在一起。潜在的问题是,是否有可能在转型经济中设计出连贯的、可行的科技政策,并以一种有效的——或者至少是令人满意的——方式实施它,或者科技政策是否也在与其他主要机构一起发展。换句话说,科技政策是这一时期有意识的、精心设计的和协调的努力的结果(可以吗?),还是应该被视为许多参与者的行动和相互作用的故意和意外后果的结果?第二节简要概述了作为科技政策理论基础的创新理论和模型。然后第3节描述了匈牙利中央计划的遗产。第四节分析了科技体系的最新变化,最后一节提出了政策结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inward Investment and Structural Transformation 1 Competitiveness and Technological Capabilities in Baltic Industry Cultural Perspectives on Management Issues in Hungary Industrial Development and Institutional Diversity in Central and Eastern Europe Continuity Amidst Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1