Effect of Multimodality Chest Physiotherapy Interventions on Prevention of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia among Mechanically Ventilated Patients

S. Younes, N. Ahmed, I. Ahmed, E. Hassan
{"title":"Effect of Multimodality Chest Physiotherapy Interventions on Prevention of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia among Mechanically Ventilated Patients","authors":"S. Younes, N. Ahmed, I. Ahmed, E. Hassan","doi":"10.21608/asalexu.2022.246005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) refers to nosocomial pneumonia occurring 48 hours or more after initiation of mechanical ventilation (MV). Critically ill patients who is receiving mechanical ventilation may have an increased risk of VAP due to multiple factors as sputum retentions and atelectasis. Thus, different combinations of chest physiotherapy assist in the re-expansion of the atelectatic lung, confer short-term improvement in total lung-thorax compliance and expiratory flow rates, and reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Objective: To identify the effect of multimodality chest physiotherapy interventions on prevention of ventilator associated pneumonia among mechanically ventilated patients. Settings: The study was carried out at the general ICUs at Damanhur Medical National institute which is classified to general ICU I (15bed) and the General ICU II (13bed). Subjects: A convenient sample of 60 adult mechanically ventilated patients from the starting day of invasive mechanical ventilation were included in the study. Tools: Two tools were used to collect the data of this study. The first tool was outcomes of multimodality chest physiotherapy assessment that was used to assess the effect of multimodality chest physiotherapy interventions. The second tool was VAP bundle observation checklist that was used to assess nurses' compliance with ventilator bundle practices. Results: The findings of the current study revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups regarding the occurrence of VAP (P= 0.001). Patients who were subjected to multimodality chest physiotherapy interventions had lower VAP rate. Conclusion: The present study revealed that patients who had a twice-daily multimodality chest physiotherapy interventions in the form of manual hyperinflation, endotracheal suctioning, patient positioning plus chest percussion and mechanical chest vibration device had a better effect on decreasing VAP occurrence as well as enhance patient`s clinical outcome than those who do not had. Recommendations: The nursing staff should use chest vibrating device with other chest physiotherapy techniques to reduce VAP in mechanically ventilated patients.","PeriodicalId":272061,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Scientific Nursing Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Scientific Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asalexu.2022.246005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) refers to nosocomial pneumonia occurring 48 hours or more after initiation of mechanical ventilation (MV). Critically ill patients who is receiving mechanical ventilation may have an increased risk of VAP due to multiple factors as sputum retentions and atelectasis. Thus, different combinations of chest physiotherapy assist in the re-expansion of the atelectatic lung, confer short-term improvement in total lung-thorax compliance and expiratory flow rates, and reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Objective: To identify the effect of multimodality chest physiotherapy interventions on prevention of ventilator associated pneumonia among mechanically ventilated patients. Settings: The study was carried out at the general ICUs at Damanhur Medical National institute which is classified to general ICU I (15bed) and the General ICU II (13bed). Subjects: A convenient sample of 60 adult mechanically ventilated patients from the starting day of invasive mechanical ventilation were included in the study. Tools: Two tools were used to collect the data of this study. The first tool was outcomes of multimodality chest physiotherapy assessment that was used to assess the effect of multimodality chest physiotherapy interventions. The second tool was VAP bundle observation checklist that was used to assess nurses' compliance with ventilator bundle practices. Results: The findings of the current study revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups regarding the occurrence of VAP (P= 0.001). Patients who were subjected to multimodality chest physiotherapy interventions had lower VAP rate. Conclusion: The present study revealed that patients who had a twice-daily multimodality chest physiotherapy interventions in the form of manual hyperinflation, endotracheal suctioning, patient positioning plus chest percussion and mechanical chest vibration device had a better effect on decreasing VAP occurrence as well as enhance patient`s clinical outcome than those who do not had. Recommendations: The nursing staff should use chest vibrating device with other chest physiotherapy techniques to reduce VAP in mechanically ventilated patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模式胸部物理治疗干预对机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的预防作用
背景:呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是指在机械通气(MV)启动后48小时或更长时间内发生的院内肺炎。接受机械通气的危重患者由于痰潴留和肺不张等多种因素可能增加VAP的风险。因此,不同的胸部物理治疗组合有助于肺不张的再扩张,短期内改善肺-胸总顺应性和呼气流量,并减少呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。目的:探讨多模式胸部物理治疗干预对机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的预防作用。环境:研究在达曼胡尔国家医学研究所的普通ICU进行,分为普通ICU I(15个床位)和普通ICU II(13个床位)。对象:从有创机械通气开始日起选取60例成人机械通气患者作为方便样本纳入研究。工具:使用两种工具收集本研究的数据。第一个工具是多模式胸部物理治疗评估的结果,用于评估多模式胸部物理治疗干预的效果。第二个工具是VAP捆绑观察检查表,用于评估护士对呼吸机捆绑实践的依从性。结果:本研究结果显示,干预组与对照组在VAP发生方面存在统计学差异(P= 0.001)。接受多模式胸部物理治疗干预的患者VAP率较低。结论:每日2次的多模式胸腔物理治疗干预措施,包括手动过度充气、气管内吸痰、患者体位加胸部叩击和机械胸部振动装置,对减少VAP的发生和提高患者的临床预后有较好的效果。建议:护理人员应结合其他胸部物理治疗技术使用胸振器来降低机械通气患者的VAP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Nursing Interventions on Patients’ Health Outcomes Post Thyroidectomy Effect of head of bed elevation on intra-abdominal pressure measurement among mechanically ventilated critically ill patients Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Nurses' Compliance with Infection Control Standard Precautions Effect of Resilience Training Program for Nurse Interns on their Work Engagement Barriers of Implementing Early Goal-Directed Therapy Among Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1