Hemodynamic effects of right pelvic wedge in patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

Rohini Sigdel, M. Lama, Sanish Gurung, B. Gurung, A. Neupane, A. Pun, Saindra Shrestha
{"title":"Hemodynamic effects of right pelvic wedge in patients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia","authors":"Rohini Sigdel, M. Lama, Sanish Gurung, B. Gurung, A. Neupane, A. Pun, Saindra Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/MJPAHS.V1I2.23394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several methods have been used to prevent post spinal hypotension including preloading, co-loading, use of vasopressors, placement of pelvic wedge, lumbar wedge and tilting of operating table in parturients undergoing cesarean section. We conducted a randomized controlled study to determine the hemodynamic effects of a standard pelvic wedge placed below the right hip immediately after the spinal block till the delivery of baby. \nMethods: One hundred consenting women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to wedge group (N=50) and control group (N=50). A standard wedge was placed under the right pelvis soon after spinal anesthesia till the delivery of baby in wedge group whereas the control group remained supine. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, vasopressor consumption, other side effects like nausea, vomiting and neonatal outcome were also recorded. \nResults: The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was similar between groups (Wedge group 60% vs Control group 75.51%, p=0.125) before the birth of baby. The use of vasopressors (p=0.212), incidence of nausea (p=0.346) and Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes (p=0.629, p=0.442) were also not statistically significant. None of the patients had vomiting. \nConclusion: In our study, the use of right pelvic wedge immediately after spinal anesthesia was not effective in preventing post spinal hypotension in elective cesarean section.","PeriodicalId":256896,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/MJPAHS.V1I2.23394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several methods have been used to prevent post spinal hypotension including preloading, co-loading, use of vasopressors, placement of pelvic wedge, lumbar wedge and tilting of operating table in parturients undergoing cesarean section. We conducted a randomized controlled study to determine the hemodynamic effects of a standard pelvic wedge placed below the right hip immediately after the spinal block till the delivery of baby. Methods: One hundred consenting women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to wedge group (N=50) and control group (N=50). A standard wedge was placed under the right pelvis soon after spinal anesthesia till the delivery of baby in wedge group whereas the control group remained supine. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, vasopressor consumption, other side effects like nausea, vomiting and neonatal outcome were also recorded. Results: The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was similar between groups (Wedge group 60% vs Control group 75.51%, p=0.125) before the birth of baby. The use of vasopressors (p=0.212), incidence of nausea (p=0.346) and Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes (p=0.629, p=0.442) were also not statistically significant. None of the patients had vomiting. Conclusion: In our study, the use of right pelvic wedge immediately after spinal anesthesia was not effective in preventing post spinal hypotension in elective cesarean section.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产术患者右骨盆楔的血流动力学影响
背景:在剖宫产术中,预防术后低血压的方法有:预压、共压、使用血管加压剂、放置骨盆楔、腰椎楔和倾斜手术台。我们进行了一项随机对照研究,以确定在脊髓阻滞后立即将标准骨盆楔置于右髋关节下方直至分娩的血流动力学影响。方法:经同意在脊髓麻醉下行选择性剖宫产术的妇女100例,随机分为楔形组(N=50)和对照组(N=50)。在脊髓麻醉后不久,在右侧骨盆下放置一个标准的楔形物,直到分娩,楔形物组保持仰卧位,而对照组保持仰卧位。血流动力学参数包括血压、心率、血管加压剂用量、恶心、呕吐等其他副作用和新生儿结局。结果:两组婴儿出产前低血压和心动过缓的发生率相近(楔形组为60%,对照组为75.51%,p=0.125)。血管加压药物的使用(p=0.212)、恶心发生率(p=0.346)和1、5分钟Apgar评分(p=0.629, p=0.442)也无统计学意义。没有病人呕吐。结论:在我们的研究中,脊髓麻醉后立即使用右骨盆楔不能有效预防择期剖宫产术后脊髓低血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study Anelgesic Efficacy of Intra-Thecal Tramadol as a Spinal Adjunct to 0.5% Heavy Bupivacaine in Lower Abdominal Surgery Adherence to Buprenorphine Maintenance Treatment Program in Western Nepal Medico Legal Cases in One Stop Crisis Management Center (OCMC) Kaski Effectiveness of Prenatal Ultrasound Examination at Second Trimester in Detecting Fetal Congenital Abnormalities-A Preliminary Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1