Comparaison du rôle des organes de contrôle de la réglementation dans les pays d’Europe centrale et orientale

Katarína Staroňová
{"title":"Comparaison du rôle des organes de contrôle de la réglementation dans les pays d’Europe centrale et orientale","authors":"Katarína Staroňová","doi":"10.3166/pmp.35.2018.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparing the Roles of Regulatory Oversight Bodies in Central and Eastern European Countries. Currently, there is ongoing discussion about the role of regulatory oversight bodies in relation to the implementation of regulatory impact assessments (RIAs). In fact, one can witness a diffusion of regulatory oversight systems, including in CEE countries, where introduction of an RIA oversight body became part of the modernization of the overall RIA process to become more effective. In fact, the regulatory oversight mechanism is seen as a tool for the instrumental role of regulation governance. However, this approach does not adequately explain the rationale behind setting up such a body ; strategic and symbolic roles may be significant as well. This article first compares the manner in which oversight mechanisms have been institutionalized in five Central and East European countries : the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia. Second, it explores how differences in institutionalization and operation shed light on understanding what stakeholders expect and understand in relation to control of RIA quality. The paper concludes that there are marked differences in regulatory oversight set-up and roles across Central and East Europe, notably as a consequence of the presence or absence of internal learning. © 2018 IDMP/ Lavoisier SAS. Tous droits réservés","PeriodicalId":426902,"journal":{"name":"Politiques et management public","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politiques et management public","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3166/pmp.35.2018.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparing the Roles of Regulatory Oversight Bodies in Central and Eastern European Countries. Currently, there is ongoing discussion about the role of regulatory oversight bodies in relation to the implementation of regulatory impact assessments (RIAs). In fact, one can witness a diffusion of regulatory oversight systems, including in CEE countries, where introduction of an RIA oversight body became part of the modernization of the overall RIA process to become more effective. In fact, the regulatory oversight mechanism is seen as a tool for the instrumental role of regulation governance. However, this approach does not adequately explain the rationale behind setting up such a body ; strategic and symbolic roles may be significant as well. This article first compares the manner in which oversight mechanisms have been institutionalized in five Central and East European countries : the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia. Second, it explores how differences in institutionalization and operation shed light on understanding what stakeholders expect and understand in relation to control of RIA quality. The paper concludes that there are marked differences in regulatory oversight set-up and roles across Central and East Europe, notably as a consequence of the presence or absence of internal learning. © 2018 IDMP/ Lavoisier SAS. Tous droits réservés
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较中欧和东欧国家监管机构的作用
比较中欧和东欧国家监管机构的作用。目前,关于监管机构在实施监管影响评估(ria)方面的作用正在进行讨论。事实上,人们可以看到监管监督系统的扩散,包括在中东欧国家,在这些国家,引入RIA监督机构成为整个RIA过程现代化的一部分,从而变得更加有效。事实上,监管监督机制被视为监管治理的工具。但是,这种做法没有充分解释设立这样一个机构的理由;战略性和象征性的角色也很重要。本文首先比较了五个中欧和东欧国家(捷克共和国、爱沙尼亚、匈牙利、斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚)监督机制制度化的方式。其次,它探讨了制度化和操作的差异如何揭示了利益相关者对RIA质量控制的期望和理解。该论文的结论是,中欧和东欧各国在监管机构的设置和角色方面存在显著差异,这主要是由于内部学习的存在或缺乏。©2018 IDMP/拉瓦锡SAS。我们的权利是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thèses Hommage au professeur Leduc L’engagement au travail des gestionnaires publics : le cas des directeurs régionaux tunisiens Réflexions sur les éléments pertubateurs du contrat psychologique en EHPAD Transformer l’action publique par les chiffres : le cas de l’accompagnement des chômeurs en Belgique francophone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1