Optimization of Bone Implant Selection with Price Analysis

Seyed Ebrahim Vahdat, Alireza Pournaghi
{"title":"Optimization of Bone Implant Selection with Price Analysis","authors":"Seyed Ebrahim Vahdat, Alireza Pournaghi","doi":"10.11127/IJAMMC.2013.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces a mathematical method based on fuzzy logic which is used in designing of bone implant. Five sets of criteria are defined as follow: total corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, adherence, technical specs and price. Each of these criterions is divided into its subsets. Then membership functions of sets are defined. In continuation the satisfactory degree is calculated. Finally, biomaterial favorability is determined and the effect of price on sensitivity analysis is analyzed. Twelve common metallic biomaterials are used in the database. These methods show the satisfactory value for bone implant as a continuous value ranging from zero to one. Therefore, biomaterial designer can compare a new material to the database systematically and he/she can determine restricted parameters to increase the performance of bone implant. The results show; the model is sensitive. In addition; price is an effective parameter in the selection of implants and it leads to customer satisfaction. Dieter defined the material selection as swiftness of the process of designing any component which its purpose is to reduce cost while gaining product performance goals [1]. Therefore, logical selection of the best material for a given application begins with properties and price of candidate materials. An Ashby plot is a scatter scheme which displays two or more properties of different materials [2]. Therefore, a material of excellent technical specs may have not sufficient biocompatibility, while a material with good compatibility may have low technical specs. Nowadays materials are developing faster than at any other time historically; the challenges and opportunities are therefore greater than ever before. Karande and Chakraborty found out that a systematic and numerical method for material selection will help the material designers to choose and compare the new material with the common materials database [3]. Ramalhete et al., Jahan et al., Chatterjee and Chakraborty concluded that on the basis of mathematical methods, it is possible to maximize the utilization of design [4, 5, 6]. Therefore, this paper deals with mathematical strategies of developing bone implant selection. A few researches, using various approaches, have been done about the selection and optimization of bone implant. Albiñanaand Vila analyzed a workflow that breaks the work down into stages and gates, and specifies how the preliminary selection is to be performed [7]. Rao and Patel used subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection [8]. Rao and Davim used a combined multiple attribute decision-making method for material selection [9]. Also, Bahraminasab and Jahan used comprehensive special method (VIKOR) for material selection of femoral component of total knee replacement [10]. José et al selected a biomaterial approach to the construction of valve leaflets for cardiac bio-prostheses[11]. Zander and Sandström expected the optimum material is strongly dependent on the chosen target functions and constraints. It is demonstrated that the two approaches for materials optimization give identical results for pressure vessel [12]. As it is clear, none of them focused on material selection of bone implants based on fuzzy logic. Fuzzy logic investigates the relative properties of the material. In order to accomplish this, fuzzy approach defines a set for each property. For example, various materials have different biologic properties and price, so these materials have different membership degree in the set of biomaterials. Using these sets and fuzzy rules, biomaterial designer can compare and evaluate different materials for specific applications. Therefore, in this","PeriodicalId":207087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Materials Manufacturing and Characterization","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Materials Manufacturing and Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11127/IJAMMC.2013.02.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper introduces a mathematical method based on fuzzy logic which is used in designing of bone implant. Five sets of criteria are defined as follow: total corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, adherence, technical specs and price. Each of these criterions is divided into its subsets. Then membership functions of sets are defined. In continuation the satisfactory degree is calculated. Finally, biomaterial favorability is determined and the effect of price on sensitivity analysis is analyzed. Twelve common metallic biomaterials are used in the database. These methods show the satisfactory value for bone implant as a continuous value ranging from zero to one. Therefore, biomaterial designer can compare a new material to the database systematically and he/she can determine restricted parameters to increase the performance of bone implant. The results show; the model is sensitive. In addition; price is an effective parameter in the selection of implants and it leads to customer satisfaction. Dieter defined the material selection as swiftness of the process of designing any component which its purpose is to reduce cost while gaining product performance goals [1]. Therefore, logical selection of the best material for a given application begins with properties and price of candidate materials. An Ashby plot is a scatter scheme which displays two or more properties of different materials [2]. Therefore, a material of excellent technical specs may have not sufficient biocompatibility, while a material with good compatibility may have low technical specs. Nowadays materials are developing faster than at any other time historically; the challenges and opportunities are therefore greater than ever before. Karande and Chakraborty found out that a systematic and numerical method for material selection will help the material designers to choose and compare the new material with the common materials database [3]. Ramalhete et al., Jahan et al., Chatterjee and Chakraborty concluded that on the basis of mathematical methods, it is possible to maximize the utilization of design [4, 5, 6]. Therefore, this paper deals with mathematical strategies of developing bone implant selection. A few researches, using various approaches, have been done about the selection and optimization of bone implant. Albiñanaand Vila analyzed a workflow that breaks the work down into stages and gates, and specifies how the preliminary selection is to be performed [7]. Rao and Patel used subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection [8]. Rao and Davim used a combined multiple attribute decision-making method for material selection [9]. Also, Bahraminasab and Jahan used comprehensive special method (VIKOR) for material selection of femoral component of total knee replacement [10]. José et al selected a biomaterial approach to the construction of valve leaflets for cardiac bio-prostheses[11]. Zander and Sandström expected the optimum material is strongly dependent on the chosen target functions and constraints. It is demonstrated that the two approaches for materials optimization give identical results for pressure vessel [12]. As it is clear, none of them focused on material selection of bone implants based on fuzzy logic. Fuzzy logic investigates the relative properties of the material. In order to accomplish this, fuzzy approach defines a set for each property. For example, various materials have different biologic properties and price, so these materials have different membership degree in the set of biomaterials. Using these sets and fuzzy rules, biomaterial designer can compare and evaluate different materials for specific applications. Therefore, in this
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于价格分析的骨种植体选择优化
本文介绍了一种基于模糊逻辑的数学方法在骨种植体设计中的应用。五套标准定义如下:总耐蚀性、生物相容性、粘附性、技术规格和价格。这些标准中的每一个都被分成它的子集。然后定义集合的隶属函数。继续计算满意程度。最后,确定生物材料的有利度,并分析价格对敏感性分析的影响。数据库中使用了12种常见的金属生物材料。这些方法显示骨种植体的满意值为0到1的连续值。因此,生物材料设计者可以系统地将新材料与数据库进行比较,并确定限制性参数以提高骨植入物的性能。结果表明:这个模型很敏感。除了;价格是植入物选择的一个有效参数,它决定着顾客的满意度。Dieter将材料选择定义为设计任何部件过程的快速性,其目的是在获得产品性能目标的同时降低成本[1]。因此,对于给定应用程序的最佳材料的逻辑选择从候选材料的属性和价格开始。Ashby图是显示不同材料的两种或两种以上性质的散点图[2]。因此,技术规格优良的材料可能没有足够的生物相容性,而相容性好的材料可能具有较低的技术规格。如今,材料的发展速度比历史上任何时候都要快;因此,挑战和机遇比以往任何时候都要大。Karande和Chakraborty发现一种系统的、数值化的材料选择方法可以帮助材料设计者选择新材料并将其与常用材料数据库进行比较[3]。Ramalhete等人、Jahan等人、Chatterjee和Chakraborty等人认为,在数学方法的基础上,可以最大限度地利用设计[4,5,6]。因此,本文讨论了发展种植体选择的数学策略。关于骨种植体的选择与优化,已有一些研究,采用了多种方法。Albiñanaand Vila分析了一个将工作分解为阶段和门的工作流,并指定了如何执行初步选择[7]。Rao和Patel采用主客观综合多属性决策方法进行材料选择[8]。Rao和david采用组合多属性决策方法进行材料选择[9]。Bahraminasab和Jahan采用综合特殊方法(VIKOR)选择全膝关节置换术股骨假体的材料[10]。jossel等人选择了一种生物材料方法来构建心脏生物假体的瓣膜小叶[11]。Zander和Sandström预计,最佳材料强烈依赖于所选择的目标函数和约束。结果表明,这两种方法对压力容器的材料优化效果相同[12]。显然,他们都没有关注基于模糊逻辑的骨植入物材料选择。模糊逻辑研究材料的相关性质。为了实现这一点,模糊方法为每个属性定义了一个集合。例如,各种材料具有不同的生物特性和价格,因此这些材料在生物材料集合中具有不同的隶属度。利用这些集合和模糊规则,生物材料设计者可以比较和评估不同材料的具体应用。因此,在这里
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Pouring Temperature on the Hardness and Wear Resistance of Bronze CuPb10Sn8Zn2 Haz Formation And Analysis In Flux Assisted Gtaw Evaluation Of Microstructure And Mechanical Properties Of Explosively Welded Aluminium Alloy And Low Carbon Steel Plates The Scope of Machining of Advanced Ceramics by ElectroDischarge Machining and Its Hybrid Variants Analysis of a stress concentration factor for a plate with varying loading conditions- finite element approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1