The Effect of Mandatory Disclosure on Open-Market Repurchases

M. Simkovic
{"title":"The Effect of Mandatory Disclosure on Open-Market Repurchases","authors":"M. Simkovic","doi":"10.15779/Z384W08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Publicly traded companies distribute cash to shareholders either through dividends or through anonymous repurchases of the companies' own stock on the open market. Companies must announce a repurchase authorization but do not actually have to repurchase any stock, and until recently companies did not have to disclose whether or not they were in fact repurchasing any stock. Scholars and regulators noticed that companies frequently announced repurchases but then appeared not to complete them. They feared that such announcements might be used by insiders to exploit public investors. To reduce opportunities for exploitive behavior, the SEC required that companies disclose their repurchase activity in their quarterly filings beginning in January 2004. This Article tracks 365 repurchase programs announced in 2004 and finds that, since the SEC disclosure requirement went into effect, companies are more likely to complete their announced repurchases and do so within a shorter time period after the repurchase announcement. Michael Simkovic will be a professor at Seton Hall Law School starting in Fall 2010. He authored this article as a John M. Olin Fellow in Law and Economics at Harvard Law School. He thanks the School's John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business for its generous support. He also thanks his faculty advisor, Guhan Subramanian, for his guidance. Finally, he thanks his research assistants, Victoria Salisbury, Laura Dauban, Ian J. Pohl, Yifei Chen, Joshua Reilly, and Winnie Nip for their assistance gathering and coding data. The views expressed are those of Michael Simkovic and do not reflect the views of Harvard Law School, the Olin Center, or any other organization. Email: msimkovic@gmail.com. Mobile Phone: 516-423-9187. Effect of Mandatory Disclosure on Open-Market Stock Repurchases","PeriodicalId":326069,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z384W08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Publicly traded companies distribute cash to shareholders either through dividends or through anonymous repurchases of the companies' own stock on the open market. Companies must announce a repurchase authorization but do not actually have to repurchase any stock, and until recently companies did not have to disclose whether or not they were in fact repurchasing any stock. Scholars and regulators noticed that companies frequently announced repurchases but then appeared not to complete them. They feared that such announcements might be used by insiders to exploit public investors. To reduce opportunities for exploitive behavior, the SEC required that companies disclose their repurchase activity in their quarterly filings beginning in January 2004. This Article tracks 365 repurchase programs announced in 2004 and finds that, since the SEC disclosure requirement went into effect, companies are more likely to complete their announced repurchases and do so within a shorter time period after the repurchase announcement. Michael Simkovic will be a professor at Seton Hall Law School starting in Fall 2010. He authored this article as a John M. Olin Fellow in Law and Economics at Harvard Law School. He thanks the School's John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business for its generous support. He also thanks his faculty advisor, Guhan Subramanian, for his guidance. Finally, he thanks his research assistants, Victoria Salisbury, Laura Dauban, Ian J. Pohl, Yifei Chen, Joshua Reilly, and Winnie Nip for their assistance gathering and coding data. The views expressed are those of Michael Simkovic and do not reflect the views of Harvard Law School, the Olin Center, or any other organization. Email: msimkovic@gmail.com. Mobile Phone: 516-423-9187. Effect of Mandatory Disclosure on Open-Market Stock Repurchases
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制性信息披露对公开市场回购的影响
上市公司通过分红或在公开市场上匿名回购公司股票的方式向股东派发现金。公司必须宣布回购授权,但实际上不必回购任何股票,而且直到最近,公司还不必披露它们是否实际上在回购任何股票。学者和监管机构注意到,企业经常宣布回购,但随后似乎没有完成。他们担心这样的公告可能会被内部人士用来剥削公众投资者。为了减少剥削行为的机会,美国证券交易委员会要求公司从2004年1月开始在季度报告中披露其回购活动。本文追踪了2004年宣布的365个回购项目,发现自SEC披露要求生效以来,公司更有可能在回购公告后较短的时间内完成其宣布的回购。Michael Simkovic将从2010年秋季开始担任西顿霍尔法学院的教授。本文作者是哈佛大学法学院(Harvard Law School)法律与经济学约翰·奥林(John M. Olin)研究员。他感谢学院的约翰·m·奥林法律、经济和商业中心的慷慨支持。他还感谢他的指导老师古汉·萨勃拉曼尼亚(Guhan Subramanian)的指导。最后,他感谢他的研究助理Victoria Salisbury、Laura Dauban、Ian J. Pohl、Yifei Chen、Joshua Reilly和Winnie Nip协助收集和编码数据。本文仅代表Michael Simkovic的观点,不代表哈佛法学院、奥林中心或任何其他组织的观点。电子邮件:msimkovic@gmail.com。手机:516-423-9187。强制性披露对公开市场股票回购的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Responsibility of Business Is Not Social Responsibility: Assume That There Are No Angels and Allow the Free Market's Touch of Heaven Piercing the Corporate Veil: Historical, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives Effectively Discharging Fiduciary Duties in IP-Rich M&A Transactions The Enigma of Hostile Takeovers in Japan: Bidder Beware National Security Review in Foreign Investments: A Comparative and Critical Assessment on China and U.S. Laws and Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1